Long-term stability of N1 sources using low-resolution electromagnetic tomography

Brain Topography

Volumn 19, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 11-20

  Atcherson, Samuel R ^a,b   Gould, Herbert Jay ^a   Pousson, Monique A ^a   Prout, Tina M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

^b W O Farber Center for Civic Leadership   (United States)

Author keywords

LORETA; N1; Source analysis; Stability; Variability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; BRAIN TOMOGRAPHY; ELECTRODE; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LOW RESOLUTION ELECTROMAGNETIC TOMOGRAPHY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCALP; SIGNAL DETECTION; TEMPORAL LOBE; WAVEFORM;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTRODES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; TEMPORAL LOBE;

EID: 33845536596     PISSN: 08960267     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10548-006-0008-8     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Alcaini, M., Giard, M.H., Thevenet, M. and Pernier, J. Two separate frontal components in the N1 wave of the human auditory evoked response. Psychophysiology, 1994, 31: 611-615.
2. Anderer, P., Pascual-Marqui, R.D., Semlitsch, H.V. and Saletu, B. Differential effects of normal aging on sources of standard N1, target N1 and target P300 auditory event-related brain potentials revealed by low resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA). Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1998, 108(2): 160-174.
3. Budd, T.W., Barry, R.J., Gordon, E., Rennie, C. and Michie, P.T. Decrement of the N1 auditory event-related potential with stimulus repetition: habituation vs. refractoriness. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 1998, 31(1): 51-68.
4. Davis, H. and Zerlin, S. Acoustic relations of the human vertex potential. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1966, 39: 109-116.
5. Davis, P.A. Effects of acoustic stimuli on the waking human brain. J. Neurophysiol. 1939, 2: 494-499.
6. D'Esposito, M., Ballard, D., Zarahn, E. and Aguirre, G.K. The role of prefrontal cortex in sensory memory and motor preparation: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage, 2000, 11(5 Pt 1): 400-408.
7. Eggermont, J.J. and Ponton, C.W. The neurophysiology of auditory perception: from single units to evoked potentials. Audiol. Neurootol. 2002, 7(2): 71-99.
8. Fruhstorfer, H., Soveri, P. and Jarvilehto, T. Short-term habituation of the auditory evoked response in man. Electroencephalogr Clin. Neurophysiol. 1970, 28(2): 153-161.
9. Giard, M., Perrin, F., Echallier, J., Thevenet, M., Froment, J. and Pernier, J. Dissociation of temporal and frontal components in the human auditory N1 wave: a scalp current density and dipole model analysis. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1994, 92: 238-252.
10. Golgeli, A., Suer, C., Ozesmi, C., Dolu, N., Ascioglu, M. and Sahin, O. The effect of sex differences on event-related potentials in young adults. Int. J. Neurosci. 1999, 99(1-4): 69-77.
11. Harasty, J., Seldon, H.L., Chan, P., Halliday, G. and Harding, A. The left human speech-processing cortex is thinner but longer than the right. Laterality 2003 8(3): 247-260.
12. Hari, R., Aittoniemi, K., Jarvinen, M.L., Katila, T. and Varpula, T. Auditory evoked transient and sustained magnetic fields of the human brain. Localization of neural generators. Exp. Brain. Res. 1980, 40(2): 237-240.
13. Hyde, M. The N1 response and its applications. Audiol. Neurootol. 1997 2(5): 281-307.
14. Jacobson, G.P., McCaslin, D.L., Smith, B., Elisevich, K. and Mishler, P. Test-retest stability and short-term habituation of the N1 and gamma band response. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 1999, 10(4): 211-218.
15. Jacobson, G.P., Tepley, N., Peterson, E.L., Newman, C.W., Ahmad, B.K., Kanna, I., Moran, J. and Wharton, J. Reexamination of gender differences in the source location of N1m. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 1993, 4(2): 69-75.
16. Kileny, P.R. and Kripal, J.P. Test-retest variability of auditory event-related potentials. Ear. Hear. 1987 8(2): 110-114.
17. Kinoshita, S., Inoue, M., Maeda, H., Nakamura, J. and Morita, K. Long-term patterns of change in ERPs across repeated measurements. Physiol. Behav. 1996 60(4): 1087-1092.
18. Lantz, G., Michel, C.M., Pascual-Marqui, R.D., Spinelli, L., Seeck, M., Seri, S., Landis, T. and Rosen, I. Extracranial localization of intracranial interictal epileptiform activity using LORETA (low resolution electromagnetic tomography). Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1997, 102(5): 414-422.
19. Lauter, J.L. and Karzon, R.G. Individual differences in auditory electric responses: comparisons of between-subject and within-subject variability. IV. Latency-variability comparisons in early, middle, and late responses. Scand. Audiol. 1990, 19(3): 175-182.
20. Lauter, J.L. and Karzon, R.G. Individual differences in auditory electric responses: comparisons of between-subject and within-subject variability. V. Amplitude-variability comparisons in early, middle, and late responses. Scand. Audiol. 1990, 19(4): 201-206.
21. Louza, M.R., Adler, G. and Gattaz, W.F. Temporal stability of auditory evoked potentials at different stimulation rates. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 1994, 27(10): 2413-2421.
22. Lutkenhoner, B. and Steinstrater, O. High-precision neuromagnetic study of the functional organization of the human auditory cortex. Audiol. Neurootol. 1998, 3(2-3): 191-213.
23. Michalewski, H.J., Prasher, D.K. and Starr, A. Latency variability and temporal interrelationships of the auditory event-related potentials (N1, P2, N2, and P3) in normal subjects. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1986, 65(1): 59-71.
24. Musiek, F.E. and Reeves, A.G. Asymmetries of the auditory areas of the cerebrum. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 1990, 1(4): 240-245.
25. Näätänen, R. and Picton, T. The N1 wave of the human electric andmagnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987, 24(4): 375-425.
26. Neurosoft. SCAN [computer program]. 4.0.33. Sterling, VA: Neurosoft, Inc. 1999.
27. Neurosoft. STIM [computer program]. 2.4.13. Sterling, VA: Neurosoft, Inc. 1998.
28. Oldfield, R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9: 97-113.
29. O'Reilly, M.A., Cunningham, C.J., Lawlor, B.A., Walsh, C.D. and Rowan, M.J. The effect of the menstrual cycle on. electrophysiological and behavioralmeasures ofmemory and mood. Psychophysiology 2004, 41(4): 592-603
30. Pascual-Marqui, R.D., Esslen, M., Kochi, K. and Lehmann, D. Functional imaging with low-resolution brain. electromagnetic tomography (LORETA): a review. Meth. Find. Exp. Clin. Pharmacol. (Suppl. C), 2002, 24 91-95.
31. Pascual-Marqui, R.D., Michel, C.M. and Lehmann, D. Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 1994, 18(1): 49-65.
32. Pekkonen, E., Rinne, T. and Näätänen, R. Variability and replicability of the mismatch negativity. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1995, 96(6): 546-554.
33. Picton, T.W., Alain, C., Woods, D.L., John, M.S., Scherg, M., Valdes-Sosa, P., Bosch-Bayard, J. and Trujillo, N.J. Intracerebral sources of human auditory-evoked potentials. Audiol. Neurootol. 1999, 4(2): 64-79.
34. Romanski, L.M., Tian, B., Fritz, J., Mishkin, M., Goldman-Rakic, P.S. and Rauschecker, J.P. Dual streams of auditory afferents target multiple domains in the primate prefrontal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 1999, 2(12): 1131-1136.
35. Rosenzweig, M.R. Representations of the two ears at the auditory cortex. Amer. J. Physiol. 1951, 167 147-158.
36. Roth, W.T., Kopell, B.S., Tinklenberg, J.R., Huntsberger, G.E. and Kraemer, H.C. Reliability of the contingent negative variation and the auditory evoked potential. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1975, 38(1): 45-50.
37. Rubens, A.B., Mahowald, M.W. and Hutton, J.T. Asymmetry of the lateral (sylvian) fissures in man. Neurology 1976, 26(7): 620-624.
38. Scherg, M. and Von Cramon, D. Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1986, 65(5): 344-360.
39. Scherg, M. and Von Cramon, D. Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1985, 62(1): 32-44.
40. Source Signal Imaging. EMSE [computer program]. 4.2. San Diego, CA: Source Signal Imaging, Inc. 1999.
41. Source Signal Imaging. LOCATOR [computer program]. 4.1. San Diego, CA: Source Signal Imaging, Inc. 1998.
42. Tarkka, I.M., Stokic, D.S., Basile, L.F. and Papanicolaou, A.C. Electric source localization of the auditory P300 agrees with magnetic source localization. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1995, 96(6): 538-545.
43. Ungan, P., Yagcioglu, S. and Goksoy, C. Differences between the N1 waves of the responses to interaural time and intensity disparities: scalp topography and dipole sources. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2001, 112(3): 485-498.
44. Walpurger, V., Pietrowsky, R., Kirschbaum, C. and Wolf, O.T. Effects of the menstrual cycle on auditory event-related potentials. Horm. Behav. 2004, 46(5): 600-606.
45. Wolpaw, J.R. and Penry, J.K. A temporal component of the auditory evoked response. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1975, 39(6): 609-620.
46. Woods, D.L. The component structure of the N1 wave of the human auditory evoked potential. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. (Suppl.), 1995, 44: 102-109.