The relationship of promotion focus, need for cognitive closure, ond categorical accessibility in American and Hong Kong Chinese university students

Journal of Creative Behavior

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 201-215

  Ip, Grace Wai Man ^b   Chen, Jing ^b   Chiu, Chi Yue ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845506448     PISSN: 00220175     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2006.tb01273.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. BARSALOU, L. W. (1985). Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, 629-654.
2. CHIU, C., MORRIS, M., HONG, Y., & MENON, T. (2000). Motivated cultural cognition: The impact of implicit cultural theories on dispositional attribution varies as a function of need for closure. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 78, 247-259.
3. FRIEDMAN, R. S., & FORSTER, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 81, 1001-1013.
4. FRIEDMAN, R. S., & FORSTER, J. (2002). The influence of approach and avoidance motor actions on creative cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 41-55.
5. HAMPTON, J. A. (1997). Emergent attributes in combined concepts. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 83-110). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6. HIGGINS, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability and salience. In E. T. Higgins and A. E. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York: Guilford.
7. HIGGINS, E. T., FRIEDMAN, R. S., HARLOW, R. E., IDSON, L. C., AYDUK, O. N., & TAYLOR, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 3-23.
8. HIGGINS, E. T., SHAH, J., & FRIEDMAN, R. (1997). Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 72, 515-525.
9. IP, G. W-M., & CHIU, C. (2001). Assessing prevention pride and promotion pride in Chinese and American cultures: Validity of the Regulatory Focus Questionnaire, unpublished manuscript.
10. JOST, J., GLASER, J., KRUGLANSKI, A. W., & SULLOWAY, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psycholological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
11. KRUGLANSKI, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases. New York: Plenum.
12. KRUGLANSKI, A. W. (1990). Lay epistemic theory in social cognitive psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 181-197.
13. KRUGLANSKI, A. W., & WEBSTER, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: "Seizing" and "freezing." Psychological Review, 103, 263-283.
14. LAM, T. W., & CHIU, C. (2002). The motivational function of regulatory focus in creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 36, 138-150.
15. LEE, A. Y., AAKER, J. L., & GARDNER W. L. (2000). The pleasures and pains of distinct self-construals: The role of interdependence in regulatory focus. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 78, 1122-1134.
16. LEUNG, A. K-Y., MADDUX, W. W., GALINSKY, A. D., CHIU, C-Y., & LAW, W. (2006). Does multicultural experience enhance creativity? If so, how and when? Manuscript under review.
17. TORRANCE, E. P., GOWAN, J. C., Wu, J. J., & AUOTTI, N. C. (1970). Creative functioning of monolingual children in Singapore. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 72-75.
18. WAN, W., & CHIU, C. (2002). Effects of novel conceptual combination on creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 36, 227-241.
19. WARD, T. B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of conceptual structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 1-40.
20. WARD, T. B., PATTERSON, M. J., SIFONIS, C. M., DODDS, R. A., & SAUNDERS, K. M. (2002). The role of graded category structure in imaginative thought. Memory and Cognition, 30, 199-216.
21. WARD, T. B., & SIFONIS, C. M. (1997). Task demands and generative thinking: What changes and what remains the same? Journal of Creative Behavior, 31, 245-259.
22. WARD, T. B., SMITH, S. M., & VAID, J. (1997). Conceptual structures and processes in creative thought. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 1-27). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
23. WEBSTER, D. M., & KRUGLANSKI, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 72, 1049-1062.