Influence of the condition of the adjacent tooth surface on fluorescence measurements for the detection of approximal caries

European Journal of Oral Sciences

Volumn 114, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 478-482

  Lussi, A ^a,c   Zimmerli, B ^a   Hellwig, E ^b   Jaeggi, T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^c School Dental Service   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Approximal caries; Caries detection; Dental material; DIAGNOdentpen; Laser fluorescence

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL;

ARTICLE; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; ENAMEL; FLUORESCENCE; HUMAN; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; LASER; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATHOLOGY; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CARIES ACTIVITY TESTS; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FLUORESCENCE; HUMANS; LASERS; MOLAR; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; ZINC OXIDE-EUGENOL CEMENT;

EID: 33845440287     PISSN: 09098836     EISSN: 16000722     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00410.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. EKSTRAND KR. Improving clinical visual detection - potential for caries clinical trials. J Dent Res 2004; 83: C67-C71.
2. WENZEL A. Bitewing and digital bitewing radiography for detection of caries lesion. J Dent Res 2004; 83: C72-C75.
3. LUSSI A, HACK A, HUG I, HECKENBERGER H, MEGERT B, STICH H. Detection of approximal caries with a new laser fluorescence device. Caries Res 2006; 40: 97-103.
4. SHEEHY EC, BRAILSFORD SR, KIDD EA, BEIGHTON D, ZOITOPOULOS L. Comparison between visual examination and a laser fluorescence system for in vivo diagnosis of occlusal caries. Caries Res 2001; 35: 421-426.
5. CÔRTES DF, ELLWOOD RP, EKSTRAND KR. An in vitro comparison of a combined FOTI/visual examination of occlusal caries with other caries diagnostic methods and the effect of stain on their diagnostic performance. Caries Res 2003; 37: 8-16.
6. FRANCESCUT P, LUSSI A. Correlation between fissure discoloration, DIAGNOdent measurements, and caries depth: an in vitro study. Pediatr Dent 2003; 25: 559-564.
7. KRAUSE F, BRAUN A, FRENTZEN M. The possibility of detecting subgingival calculus by laser-fluorescence in vitro. Lasers Med Sci 2003; 18: 32-35.
8. BADER JD, SHUGARS DA. A systematic review of the performance of a laser fluorescence device for detecting caries. J Am Dent Assoc 2004; 135: 1413-1426.
9. MENDES FM, HISSADOMI M, IMPARATO JCP. Effects of drying time and the presence of plaque on the in vitro performance of laser fluorescence in occlusal caries of primary teeth. Caries Res 2004; 38: 104-108.
10. LUSSI A, REICH E. The influence of toothpastes and prophylaxis pastes on fluorescence measurements for caries detection In vitro. Eur J Oral Sci 2005; 113: 141-144.
11. LUSSI A, IMWINKELRIEDS, PITTS NB, LONGBOTTOM C, REICH E. Performance and reproducibility of a laser fluorescence system for detection of occlusal caries in vitro. Caries Res 1999; 33: 261-266.
12. LUSSI A, HELLWIG E. Performance of a new laser fluorescence device for the detection of occlusal caries in vitro. J Dent 2006; 34:467-471.
13. FRANCESCUT P, ZIMMERLI B, LUSSI A. Influence of different storage methods on laser fluorescence values: a two-year study. Caries Res 2006; 40: 181-185.
14. LUSSI A, MEGERT B, LONGBOTTOM C, REICH E, FRANCESCUT P. Clinical performance of a laser fluorescence device for detection of occlusal caries lesions. Eur J Oral Sci 2001; 109: 14-19.
15. IWAMI Y, SHIMIZU A, YAMAMOTO H, HAYASHI M, TAKESHIGE F, EBISU S. In vitro study of caries detection through sound dentin using a laser fluorescence device, DIAGNOdent. Eur J Oral Sci 2003; 111: 7-11.
16. VIRAJSILP V, THEARMONTREE A, PAIBOONWARACHAT D, ARYATAWONG S. Comparison of proximal caries detection in primary teeth between laser fluorescence and bitewing radiography. Pediatr Dent 2005; 27: 493-499.