Does ownership structure affect value? A panel data analysis for the Spanish market

International Review of Financial Analysis

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 81-98

  Mínguez Vera, Antonio ^a   Martín Ugedo, Juan Francisco ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF CARTAGENA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Endogeneity; Firm value; Ownership structure

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845438143     PISSN: 10575219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2005.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Acker L.F., and Athanassakos G. A simultaneous equation analysis of analysts' forecast bias and institutional ownership. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 30 (2003) 1017-1041
2. Agrawal A., and Knoeber C.R. Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers an shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 31 (1996) 377-397
3. Arellano M., and Bover Y. Un estudio econométrico con datos de panel. Investigaciones Económicas 14 (1990) 3-45
4. Berle A.A., and Means G.C. The modern corporation and private property (1932), Macmillan, New York
5. Bhagat S., and Black B. Board independence and long term firm performance. Journal of Corporation Law 27 (2002) 231-273
6. Chaganti R., and Damanpour F. Institutional ownership, capital structure, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 12 (1991) 479-491
7. Cho M.H. Ownership structure, investment, and the corporate value: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 47 (1998) 103-121
8. Coase R.H. The nature of the firm. Economica NS 4 (1937) 386-405
9. Cronqvist H., and Nilsson M. Agency cost of controlling minority shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 38 (2003) 695-719
10. Cubbin J., and Leech D. The effect of shareholding dispersion on the degree of control in British companies: Theory and measurement. Economic Journal 93 (1983) 351-369
11. Demsetz H. The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. Journal of Law and Economics 26 (1983) 375-390
12. Demsetz H., and Lehn K. The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy 93 (1985) 1155-1177
13. Demsetz H., and Villalonga B. Ownership structure and corporate performance. Journal of Corporate Finance 7 (2001) 209-233
14. Diamond D.W. Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring. Review of Economic Studies 51 (1984) 393-414
15. Ersoy-Bozcuk, A. & Lasfer, M. A. (2000). Changes in UK share ownership and corporate monitoring. Working paper, City University Business School.
16. Fernández A.I., Gómez S., and Fernández C. El papel supervisor del consejo de administración sobre la actuación gerencial. Evidencia para el caso español. Investigaciones Económicas 22 (1998) 501-516
17. Gedajlovic E.R., and Shapiro D.M. Management and ownership effects: Evidence from five countries. Strategic Management Journal 19 (1998) 533-553
18. Gerke W., Bank M., and Steiger M. The changing role of institutional investors-A German perspective. In: Hopt K.J., and Wymeersch E. (Eds). Capital markets and company law (2003), Oxford University Press, New York 357-385
19. Hermalin B., and Weisbach M.S. The effect of board composition and direct incentives on corporate performance. Financial Management 20 (1991) 101-112
20. Hillier, D., & McColgan, P. (2001). Insider ownership and corporate value: An empirical test from the United Kingdom corporate sector. Paper presented at the Financial Management Association (FMA) Meeting, Paris.
21. Himmelberg C.P., Hubbard R.G., and Palia D. Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership and performance. Journal of Financial Economics 53 (1999) 353-384
22. Holl P. Effect of control type on the performance of the firm in the UK. Journal of Industrial Economics 25 (1975) 257-271
23. Köke, J. (2000). Control transfer in corporate Germany: Their frequency, causes and consequences. ZEW Discussion Paper (00-67).
24. La Porta, R., Lopez De Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1999). Investor protection and corporate valuation. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Papers Series (w7403).
25. Leech D., and Leahy J. Ownership structure, control type classifications and the performance of large British companies. The Economic Journal 101 (1991) 1418-1437
26. Leech D., and Manjón M. Corporate governance and game theoretic analyses of shareholder power: The case of Spain. Applied Economics 35 (2003) 847-858
27. Loderer C., and Martin K. Executive stock ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 45 (1997) 223-255
28. López F.J., and Rodríguez J.A. Ownership structure, corporate value and firm investment: A simultaneous equations analysis of Spanish companies. Journal of Management and Governance 5 (2001) 179-204
29. McConnell J.J., and Servaes H. Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics 27 (1990) 595-612
30. Mínguez, A., & Martín, J. F. (2003). El consejo de administración como mecanismo de control: Evidencia para el mercado español. Working paper, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, IVIE (WP-EC 2003-02).
31. Morck R., Shleifer A., and Vishny R.W. Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 36 (1988) 897-888
32. Mudambi R., and Nicosia C. Ownership structure and firm performance: Evidence from the UK financial services industry. Applied Financial Economics 8 (1998) 175-180
33. Murali R., and Welch J.B. Agents, owners, control and performance. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 16 (1989) 385-398
34. Özer, B., & Yamak, S. (2001). The role of market control on the relation between ownership and performance: Evidence from Turkish market. Paper presented at European Financial Management Association (EFMA) Meeting, Lugano.
35. Pound J. Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight. Journal of Financial Economics 20 (1988) 237-265
36. Prowse S. The structure of corporate ownership in Japan. Journal of Finance 47 (1992) 1121-1140
37. Renneboog L. Ownership, managerial control and the governance of companies listed on the Brussels Stock Exchange. Journal of Banking and Finance 24 (2000) 1959-1995
38. Round D.K. The effect of the separation of ownership and control on large firm profit rates in Australia: An exploratory investigation. Revista Internazionale di Science Economiche e Comercial 23 (1976) 426-436
39. Trojanowski, G., & Renneboog, L. (2002). The managerial labor market and the governance role of shareholder control structures. Social Science Research Network (SSRN) Working Paper.
40. Wiblin, M., & Woo, L. A. (1999). Are all agency resolution mechanisms performance enhancing? Paper presented at the 6th Multinational Finance Society Congress, Toronto.
41. Wu, S., & Cui, H. (2002). Ownership structure and corporate performance: Evidence from theMainland China. Paper presented at the European Financial Management Association (EFMA) Meeting, London.
42. Zeckhauser R.J., and Pound J. Are shareholders effective monitors? An investigation of share ownership and corporate performance. In: Hubbard G. (Ed). Asymmetric information, corporate finance, and investment (1990), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 149-180