A field study of the role of Big Five personality in applicant perceptions of selection fairness, self, and the hiring organization

International Journal of Selection and Assessment

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 269-277

  Truxillo, Donald M ^a   Bauer, Talya N ^a   Campion, Michael A ^b   Paronto, Matthew E ^a  

^a PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845408169     PISSN: 0965075X     EISSN: 14682389     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00351.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Anderson, N., Born, M. and Cunningham-Snell, N. (2001) Recruitment and selection: Applicant perspectives and out-comes. In N.R. Anderson, D. Ones, H.K. Sinangil and C. Viswesveran (Eds), Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology, Vol. 1 (pp. 200-218). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
2. Barrick, M.R. and Mount, M.K. (1991) The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
3. Bauer, T.N., Maertz, C.P., Dolen, M.R. and Campion, M.A. (1998) A longitudinal assessment of applicant reactions to an employment test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 892-903.
4. Bauer, T.N., Truxillo, D.M., Sanchez, R.J., Craig, J., Ferrara, P. and Campion, M.A. (2001) Applicant reactions to selection: Development of the Selection Procedural Justice Scale (SPJS). Personnel Psychology, 54, 387-419.
5. Bretz, R.D. Jr. and Judge, T.A. (1994) The role of human resource systems in job applicant decision processes. Journal of Management, 20, 531-551.
6. Chan, D. and Schmitt, N. (2004) An agenda for future research on applicant reactions to selection procedures: A construct-oriented approach. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 9-23.
7. Chan, D., Schmitt, N., DeShon, R.P., Clause, C. and Delbridge, K. (1997) Reactions to cognitive ability tests: The relationships between race, test performance, face validity perceptions, and test-taking motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 300-310.
8. Chan, D., Schmitt, N., Jennings, D., Clause, C. and Delbridge, K. (1998) Applicant perceptions of test fairness: Integrating justice and self-serving bias perspectives. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 6, 232-239.
9. Costa, P.T. Jr. and McCrae, R.R. (1992) NEO PI-R: Professional manual. Revised NEO personality inventory NEO PR-R and NEO five-factor inventory NEO-RRI. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.
10. Gilliland, S.W. (1993) The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational justice perspective. Academy of Management Review, 18, 694-734.
11. Goldberg, L.R. (1992) The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
12. Greenberg, J. (1993) The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 79-103). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Hausknecht, J.P., Day, D.V. and Thomas, S.C. (2004) Applicant reactions to selection procedures: An updated model and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 57, 639-683.
14. Judge, T.A., Heller, D. and Mount, M.K. (2002) Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 530-541.
15. Magnus, K., Diener, E., Fujita, F. and Pavot, W. (1993) Extraversion and neuroticism as predictors of objective life events: A longitudinal analysis, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1046-1053.
16. Moscoso, S. and Salgado, J. (2004) Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in Spain and Portugal. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 187-196.
17. Ryan, A.M. and Ployhart, R.E. (2000) Applicants' perceptions of selection procedures and decisions: A critical review and agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 26, 565-606.
18. Saucier, G. (1994) Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg's unipolar big-five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506-516.
19. Saucier, G. (2002) Orthogonal markers for orthogonal factors: The case of the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 1-31.
20. Steiner, D.D. and Gilliland, S.W. (1996) Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in France and United States. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 134-141.
21. Truxillo, D.M., Bauer, T.N., Campion, M.A. and Paronto, M.E. (2002) Selection fairness information and applicant reactions: A longitudinal field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 1020-1031.
22. Truxillo, D.M., Steiner, D.D. and Gilliland, S.W. (2004) The importance of organizational justice in personnel selection: Defining when selection fairness really matters. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 39-53.
23. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2003) Labor force statistics from the current population survey. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.pdf.
24. Van Vienen, A.E.M., Taris, R., Scholten, E. and Schinkel, S. (2004) Perceived fairness in personnel selection: Determinants and outcomes in different stages of the assessment procedure. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 149-159.
25. Viswesveran, C. and Ones, D.S. (2004) Importance of perceived personnel selection system fairness determinants: Relations with demographic, personality, and job characteristics. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 172-186.