Strategy, IT applications for planning and control, and firm performance: The impact of impediments to IT implementation

Information and Management

Volumn 43, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 939-949

  Duh, Rong Ruey ^a   Chow, Chee W ^b   Chen, Hueiling ^c  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Impediments to IT implementation; Information technology (IT) applications; Performance; Strategy

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SYSTEMS; DATA PROCESSING; FINANCE; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

IMPEDIMENTS TO IT IMPLEMENTATION; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) APPLICATIONS;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 33845405315     PISSN: 03787206     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2006.08.007     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Abell D.F., and Hammond J.S. Strategic Market Planning (1979), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
2. Anonymous. Research shows high failure rate of IT projects. Journal of Accountancy 191 2 (2001) 21
3. Anthony R.N., Dearden J., and Govindarajan V. Management Control Systems (1992), Irwin, Boston, MA
4. Babbie E.R. Survey Research Methods (1973), Wadsworth, Belmont, CA
5. Balkin B., Markman G.D., and Gomez-Mejia L.R. Is CEO pay in high-technology firms related to innovation?. Academy of Management Journal 43 6 (2000) 1118-1129
6. Bouwens J., and Abernethy M.A. The consequences of customization on management accounting system design. Accounting, Organizations and Society 25 3 (2000) 221-241
7. Boynton A.C., and Zmud R.W. Information technology planning in the 1990s: directions for practice and research. MIS Quarterly 11 1 (1987) 59-71
8. Brandyberry A., Rai A., and White G.P. Intermediate performance impacts of advanced manufacturing technology systems: an empirical investigation. Decision Sciences 30 4 (1999) 993-1020
9. Brynjolfsson E. The productivity paradox of information technology. Communication of the ACM 36 12 (1993) 45-46
10. Brynjolfsson E., and Hitt L.M. Beyond the productivity paradox. Communication of the ACM 41 8 (1998) 49-55
11. Brynjolfsson E., and Hitt L.M. Beyond computation: information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 4 (2000) 23-48
12. Burn J.M., and Szeto C. A comparison of the views of business and IT management on success factors for strategic alignment. Information & Management 37 4 (2000) 197-216
13. Byrd T.A., and Davidson N.W. Examining possible antecedents of IT impact on the supply chain and its effect on firm performance. Information & Management 41 2 (2003) 243-255
14. Chang K.-C., Jackson J., and Grover V. E-commerce and corporate strategy: an executive perspective. Information & Management 40 7 (2003) 663-675
15. Choe J.M. The effect of environmental uncertainty and strategic applications of IS on a firm's performance. Information & Management 40 4 (2003) 257-268
16. Comshare. The Comshare 2000 Survey of Top Financial Executives: Planning and Budgeting Today (2000), Markham, Ontario
17. Cooper R.B., and Zmud R.W. Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach. Management Science 36 2 (1990) 123-133
18. Davis L., Dehning B., and Stratopoulos T. Does the market recognize IT-enabled competitive advantage?. Information & Management 40 7 (2003) 705-716
19. Dos Santos B.L., and Sussman L. Improving the return on IT investment: the productivity paradox. International Journal of Information Management 20 (2000) 429-440
20. Floyd S.W., and Wooldridge B. Path analysis of the relationship between competitive strategy, information technology, and financial performance. Journal of Management Information Systems 7 1 (1990) 47-64
21. Galbraith J. Designing Complex Organizations (1973), Addison-Wesley, MA
22. Gordon L.A., and Miller D. A contingency framework for the design of accounting information systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1 (1976) 59-69
23. Govindarajan V. A contingency approach to strategy implementation at the business-unit level: integrating administrative mechanisms with strategy. Academy of Management Journal 31 4 (1988) 828-853
24. Govindarajan V., and Gupta A.K. Linking control systems to business unit strategy: impact on performance, Accounting. Organizations and Society 10 1 (1985) 51-66
25. Govindarajan V., and Shank J.K. Strategic cost management: tailoring controls to strategies. Journal of Cost Management (1992) 14-24
26. Gupta A.K., and Govindarajan V. Build, hold, harvest: converting strategic intentions into reality. Journal of Business Strategy 4 3 (1984) 34-47
27. Gupta U.G., and Capen M. An empirical investigation of the contribution of IS to manufacturing productivity. Information & Management 31 4 (1996) 227-233
28. Henderson B.D. Perspectives on the Product Portfolio (1970), Boston Consulting Group, Boston, MA
29. Hitt M.A., Hoskisson R.E., and Kim H. International diversification: effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal 40 4 (1997) 767-798
30. Hong K.K., and Kim Y.G. The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective. Information & Management 40 1 (2002) 25-40
31. Ittner C., and Larcker D. Innovations in performance measurement: trends and research implications. Journal of Management Accounting Research 10 (1998) 205-238
32. Jenster P.V. Firm performance and monitoring of critical success factors in different strategic contexts. Journal of Management Information Systems 3 3 (1986/87) 17-33
33. Jiang J.J., Muhanna W.A., and Klein G. User resistance and strategies for promoting acceptance across systems types. Information & Management 37 1 (2000) 25-36
34. Kaplan R.S., and Norton D.P. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action (1996), Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
35. Kaplan R.S., and Norton D.P. The Strategy-focused Organization (2001), Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
36. King W.R., and Sabherwal R. The factors affecting strategic information systems applications. Information & Management (1992) 217-235
37. Kivijarvi H., and Saarinen T. Investment in information on systems and the financial performance of the firm. Information & Management 28 2 (1995) 143-163
38. Lederer A.L., and Mendelow A.L. Issues in information systems planning. Information & Management 10 5 (1986) 245-254
39. Li E.Y. Perceived importance of information system success factors: a meta analysis of group differences. Information & Management 32 1 (1997) 15-28
40. Li M., and Ye L.R. Information technology and firm performance: linking with environmental, strategic and managerial contexts. Information & Management 35 1 (1999) 43-51
41. Mahood M.G., and Mann G.J. Special issue: impacts of information technology in investments on organizational performance. Journal of Management Information Systems 10 1 (2000) 97-122
42. Miles R.E., and Snow C.C. Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process (1978), McGraw-Hill, New York, NY
43. Prien E.P., and Liske R.E. Assessments of higher-level personnel: a comparative analysis of supervisor ratings and incumbent self-ratings of job performance. Personnel Psychology (1962) 187-194
44. Pyburn P.J. Linking the MIS plan with corporate strategy. MIS Quarterly (1983) 1-14
45. Ragowsky A., Ahituv N., and Neumann S. Identifying the value and importance of an information system application. Information & Management 31 2 (1996) 89-102
46. Stratopulos T., and Dehning B. Does successful investment in information technology solve the productivity paradox?. Information & Management 38 2 (2000) 103-117
47. Umble E.J., and Umble M.M. Avoiding ERP implementation failure. Industrial Management 44 (2002) 25-33
48. Wang E.T.G., and Tai J.C.F. Factors affecting information systems planning effectiveness: organizational contexts and planning systems dimensions. Information & Management 40 4 (2003) 287-303
49. Weill P. The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: a study of the value manufacturing sector. Information Systems Research 3 4 (1992) 307-333
50. Yang H.-L. Key information management issues in Taiwan and the US. Information & Management 30 5 (1996) 251-267