Does the market recognize IT-enabled competitive advantage?

Information and Management

Volumn 40, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 705-716

  Davis, Lewis ^a   Dehning, Bruce ^b   Stratopouos, Theophanis ^c  

^a SMITH COLLEGE   (United States)

^b CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

Competitive advantage; Firm performance; Information technology; IT resources; IT strategy; Market measures; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; INVESTMENTS; MARKETING; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

MARKET RESOURCES;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 0041630543     PISSN: 03787206     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00092-7     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Alpar P., Kim M. Microeconomic approach to the measurement of information technology value. Journal of Management Information Systems. 7(2):1990;29-54.
2. Barber B.M., Lyon J.D. Detecting abnormal operating performance: the empirical power and specification of test statistics. Journal of Financial Economics. 41(3):1996;359-399.
3. Barnes P. Methodological implications of non-normally distributed financial ratios. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting. 9/1:1982;51-62.
4. Barnes P. Methodological implications of non-normally distributed financial ratios: a reply. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting. 10/4:1983;691-693.
5. J. Barney, Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1997.
6. Barua A., Kriebel C., Mukhopadhyay T. Information technology and business value: an analytical and empirical investigation. Information Systems Research. 6/1:1995;3-23.
7. Bharadwaj A. A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly. 24(1):2000;169-196.
8. Bharadwaj A.S., Bharadwaj S.G., Konsynski B.R. Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin's q. Management Science. 45(7):1999;1008-1024.
9. E. Brynjolfsson, S. Yang, Information technology and productivity: a review of the literature, in: Advances in Computers, vol. 43, Academic Press, New York, 1996, pp. 179-214.
10. Clemons E., Weber B. Strategic information technology investments: guidelines for decision making. Journal of Management Information Systems. 7(2):1990;9-28.
11. Computerworld, in: B. Laberis, J. Kelleher, Computerworld Premier 100: How the Best are Playing the New Business Game, Section 2 of 2, 13 September 1993, pp. 1-59.
12. B. Davis, B. Riggs, What's the Investment Worth?: InformationWeek.com ; 5 April 1999: http://www.informationweek.com/728/k2.htm.
13. Deakin E.B. Distributions of financial accounting ratios: some empirical evidence. Accounting Review. 51:1976;90-96.
14. Dos Santos B.L., Peffers K., Mauer D. The impact of information technology investment announcements on the market value of the firm. Information Systems Research. 4:1993;1-23.
15. Fama E.F. Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance. 25/2:1970;383-417.
16. Frecka T.J., Hopwood W.S. The effects of outliers on the cross-sectional distributional properties of financial ratios. Accounting Review. 58/1:1983;115-128.
17. Hayes D.C., Hunton J.E., Reck J.L. Market reaction to ERP implementation announcements. Journal of Information Systems. 15(1):2001;3-18.
18. Hitt L., Brynjolfsson E. Productivity, profit and consumer welfare: three different measures of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 20(2):1996;121-142.
19. Horrigan J.O. Methodological implications of non-normally distributed financial ratios: a comment. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting. 10/4:1983;683-689.
20. Im K.S., Dow K.E., Grover V. A reexamination of IT investment and the market value of the firm: an event study methodology. Information Systems Research. 12(1):2001;103-117.
21. Keats B., Hitt M. A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions: macro organizational characteristics, and performance. Academy of Management Journal. 31:1988;570-598.
22. R.J. Larsen, M.L. Marx, An Introduction to Mathematical Statistics and Its Applications, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986.
23. Lenz R. Determinants of organizational performance: an interdisciplinary review. Strategic Management Journal. 2:1981;131-154.
24. T. Mayor, Value Made Visible, CIO.COM, 1 May 2000: www.cio.com/archive/050100_method_content.html.
25. R. Poston, S. Grabski, in: Proceedings of the International Conference of Information Systems on The Impact of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems on Firm Performance, 2000, Brisbane, Australia.
26. A. Ragowsky, N. Ahituv, S. Neumann, The benefits of using information systems, Communications of the ACM, vol. 43, 11es, Article no. 13, November 2000: http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/360000/352532/a13-ragowsky.pdf.
27. Rumelt R., Schendel D., Teece D. Strategic management and economics. Strategic Management Journal. 12(Winter Special):1991;5-29.
28. Sircar S., Turnbow J.L., Bordoloi B. The impact of information technology investments on firm performance: a review of the literature. Engineering Valuation and Cost Analysis. 1:1998;171-181.
29. Stratopoulos T., Dehning B. Does successful investment in information technology solve the productivity paradox? Information and Management. 38(2):2000;103-117.
30. Tam K.Y. The impact of information technology investments on firm performance and evaluation: evidence from newly industrialized economies. Information Systems Research. 9(1):1998;85-98.
31. Weill P. The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: a study of the valve manufacturing sector. Information Systems Research. 3/4:1992;307-333.
32. Zamuto R.A. Comparison of multiple constituency models of organizational effectiveness. Academy of Management Review. 9:1984;1-16.