The influence of breast self-examination on subsequent mammography participation

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 95, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 506-511

  Jelinski, Susan E ^a   Maxwell, Colleen J ^a,b   Onysko, Jay ^c   Bancej, Christina M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b INSTITUTE OF HEALTH ECONOMICS   (Canada)

^c HEALTH CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST EXAMINATION; CANADA; CANCER SCREENING; DEMOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; LIFESTYLE; MAMMOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; BREAST SELF-EXAMINATION; CANADA; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; LIFE STYLE; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MARITAL STATUS; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; VAGINAL SMEARS; WOMEN;

EID: 14644411077     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2003.032656     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. National Cancer Institute of Canada. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2003. Toronto: National Cancer Institute of Canada; 2003.
2. American Cancer Society. Cancer Statistics Slide Set 2003. Atlanta, Ga: American Cancer Society. Available at: http://www.cancer.org/docroot/STT/stt_0. asp. Accessed December 7, 2004.
3. Verbeek AL, Hendriks JH, Holland R, Mravunac M, Sturmans F, Day NE. Reduction of breast cancer mortality through mass screening with modern mammography. First results of the Nijmegen project, 1975-1981. Lancet. 1984;1:1222-1224.
4. Tabar L, Fagerberg CJ, Gad A, et al. Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet. 1985;1: 829-832.
5. Andersson I, Aspegren K, Janzon L, et al. Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmo mammographic screening trial. BMJ. 1988; 297:943-948.
6. Roberts MM, Alexander FE, Anderson TJ, et al. Edinburgh trial of screening for breast cancer: mortality at seven years. Lancet. 1990;335:241-246.
7. Miller AB, Baines CJ, To T, Wall C. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years. CMAJ. 1992;147:1459-1476.
8. Miller AB, Baines CJ, To T, Wall C. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years. CMAJ. 1992;147:1477-1488.
9. de Koning HJ, Boer R, Warmerdam PG, Beemsterboer PM, van der Maas PJ. Quantitative interpretation of age-specific mortality reductions from the Swedish breast cancer-screening trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87:1217-1223.
10. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Rubin SM, Sandrock C, Ernster VL. Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis. JAMA 1995;273:149-154.
11. Alexander FE, Anderson TJ, Brown HK, et al. 14 years of follow-up from the Edinburgh randomised trial of breast-cancer screening. Lancet. 1999;353: 1903-1908.
12. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Breast Cancer Screening. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2002. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention; vol 7.
13. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Breast Cancer Screening. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2002. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention; vol 7.
14. Barton MB, Harris R, Fletcher SW. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: should it be done? How? JAMA. 1999;282: 1270-1280.
15. Thomas DB, Gao DL, Ray RM, et al. Randomized trial of breast self-examination in Shanghai: final results. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:1445-1457.
16. Baxter N. Preventive health care, 2001 update: should women be routinely taught breast self-examination to screen for breast cancer? CMAJ. 2001;164: 1837-1846.
17. Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(5 pt 1):347-360.
18. Semiglazov VF, Moiseyenko VM, Bavli JL, et al. The role of breast self-examination in early breast cancer detection (results of the 5-years USSR/WHO randomized study in Leningrad). Eur J Epidemiol. 1992;8: 498-502.
19. Ellman R, Moss SM, Coleman D, Chamberlain J. Breast self-examination programmes in the trial of early detection of breast cancer: ten year findings. Br J Cancer. 1993;68:208-212.
20. Miller AB, Baines C, Harvey B. Breast self-examination [letter]. CMAJ. 2002;166:163; discussion 166, 168.
21. Warner E. Breast self-examination [letter]. CMAJ. 2002;166:163; discussion 166, 168.
22. Clifford TJ, Sampson M, Schachter HM. Breast self-examination [letter]. CMAJ. 2002;166:164; discussion 166, 168.
23. Mahoney L. Breast self-examination [letter]. CMAJ. 2002;166:164; discussion 166, 168.
24. Winters L. Breast self-examination [letter]. CMAJ. 2002;166:164-165; discussion 166, 168.
25. Snell S. Breast self-examination [letter]. CMAJ. 2002;166:165; discussion 166, 168.
26. Tambay JL, Catlin G. Sample design of the National Population Health Survey. Health Rep. 1995;7: 29-38 [in English]; 31-42 [in French].
27. Swain L, Catlin G, Beaudet MP. The National Population Health Survey-its longitudinal nature. Health Rep. 1999;10:69-82 [in English]; 73-89 [in French].
28. King ES, Rimer BK, Trock B, Balshem A, Engstrom P. How valid are mammography self-reports? Am J Public Health. 1990;80:1386-1388.
29. Degnan D, Harris R, Ranney J, Quade D, Earp JA, Gonzalez J. Measuring the use of mammography: two methods compared. Am J Public Health. 1992;82: 1386-1388.
30. Fulton-Kehoe D, Burg MA, Lane DS. Are self-reported dates of mammograms accurate? Public Health Rev. 1992;20:233-240.
31. Gordon NP, Hiatt RA, Lampert DI. Concordance of self-reported data and medical record audit for six cancer screening procedures. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993; 85:566-570.
32. Zapka JG, Bigelow C, Hurley T, et al. Mammography use among sociodemographically diverse women: the accuracy of self-report. Am J Public Health. 1996; 86:1016-1021.
33. Zapka JG, Stoddard A, Maul L, Costanza ME. Interval adherence to mammography screening guidelines. Med Care. 1991;29:697-707.
34. Miller AM, Champion VL. Mammography in women > or = 50 years of age. Predisposing and enabling characteristics. Cancer Nurs. 1993;16:260-269.
35. Hitchcock JL, Steckevicz MJ, Thompson WD. Screening mammography: factors associated with adherence to recommended age/frequency guidelines. Womens Health. 1995; 1(3):221-235.
36. Lee JR, Vogel VG. Who uses screening mammography regularly? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1995;4:901-906.
37. McCarthy BD, Yood MU, MacWilliam CH, Lee MJ. Screening mammography use: the importance of a population perspective. Am J Prev Med 1996;12:91-95.
38. Phillips KA, Kerlikowske K, Baker LC, Chang SW, Brown ML. Factors associated with women's adherence to mammography screening guidelines. Health Serv Res. 1998;33:29-53.
39. May DS, Kiefe CI, Funkhouser E, Fouad MN. Compliance with mammography guidelines: physician recommendation and patient adherence. Prev Med. 1999;28:386-394.
40. Parker JD, Sabogal F, Gebretsadik T. Relationship between earlier and later mammography screening-California Medicare, 1992 through 1994. West J Med. 1999;170:25-27.
41. Segura JM, Castells X, Casamitjana M, Macia F, Ferrer F. Utilization of screening mammography as a preventive practice prior to initiating a population-based breast cancer screening program. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:595-603.
42. Maxwell CJ, Bancej CM, Snider J. Predictors of mammography use among Canadian women aged 50-69: findings from the 1996/97 National Population Health Survey. CMAJ. 2001;164:329-334.
43. Kelsey JL, Whittemore AS, Evans AS, Thompson WD. Methods in Observational Epidemiology. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996.
44. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE, Nizam A. Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods. 3rd ed. Pacific Grove, Calif: Duxbury Press; 1998.
45. Liu X, Sennett C, Legorreta AP. Mammography utilization among California women age 40-49 in a managed care environment. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001;67:181-186.
46. Solomon LJ, Mickey RM, Rairikar CJ, Worden JK, Flynn BS. Three-year prospective adherence to three breast cancer screening modalities. Prev Med. 1998;27: 781-786.
47. Cummings DM, Whetstone L, Shende A, Weismiller D. Predictors of screening mammography: implications for office practice. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9: 870-875.
48. Fox SA, Murata PJ, Stein JA. The impact of physician compliance on screening mammography for older women. Arch Intern Med 1991;151:50-56.
49. Grady KE, Lemkau JP, McVay JM, Reisine ST. The importance of physician encouragement in breast cancer screening of older women. Prev Med. 1992;21: 766-780.
50. Bobo JK, Lee NC, Thames SF. Findings from 752,081 clinical breast examinations reported to a national screening program from 1995 through 1998. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:971-976.
51. Health Canada. Organized Breast Screening Programs in Canada: 1999 and 2000 Report. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada; 2001.
52. Bancej C, Decker K, Chiarelli A, Harrison M, Turner D, Brisson J. Contribution of clinical breast examination to mammography screening in the early detection of breast cancer. J Med Screening. 2003;10: 16-21.
53. Etzi S, Lane DS, Grimson R. The use of mammography vans by low-income women: the accuracy of self-reports. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:107-109.