American Indians and Alaska Natives in California: Women's cancer screening and results

Journal of Cancer Education

Volumn 20, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2005, Pages 58-64

  Satter, Delight E ^a,d   Seals, Brenda F ^b   Chia, Jenny ^a   Gatchell, Melissa ^a   Burhansstipanov, Linda ^c   Tsai, Linda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Native American Cancer Research   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMERICAN INDIAN; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALIFORNIA; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; INDIANS, NORTH AMERICAN; INUITS; MALE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 18844435417     PISSN: 08858195     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15430154jce2001s_13     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Ogunwole SU. The American Indian and Alaska Native Population: 2000. Census 2000 Brief. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; 2000.
2. California Health Information Survey. CH15 2001 Methodology series: Report 1-Sample design; Report 2-Data collection methods; Report 3-Data processing procedures; Report 2-Response rates. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research; 2002.
3. National Cancer Institute. Voices of a Broken System: Real People, Real Problems: President's Cancer Panel Report of the Chairman 2000-2001. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, PHS, NIH; 2002.
4. Edwards BK, Howe HL, Ries LA. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1973-1999, featuring implications of age and aging on the US cancer burden. Cancer. 2002;94:2766-2792.
5. Cobb N, Paisano RE. Patterns of cancer mortality among Native Americans. Cancer. 1998;83:(11):2377-2383.
6. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Legislation, Indian Health Services. Regional differences in Indian health: 1997. Rockville, MD: Indian Health Service; 1997.
7. Zuckerman S, Haley J, Roubideaux Y, Lillie-Blanton M. Health service access, use, and insurance coverage among American Indians/Alaska Natives and whites: what role does the Indian health service play? Am J Public Health. 2004;94:53-59.
8. Satter D, Rios Burrows N, Oatchell M, Taualii M, Welch D. Diabetes among American Indians and Alaska Natives in California: Prevention is the Key. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Los Angeles Center for Health Policy Research; 2003.
9. Brown ER, Ojeda VD, Wyn R, Levan R. Racial and ethnic disparities in access to health insurance and health care. Los Angeles, CA: Univesity of California, Los Angeles Center for Helath Policy Research, 2000.
10. Healthy People 2010. Available at: http://wonder.cdc.gov/DATA 2010. Accessed MONTH DAY, YEAR.
11. Ponce NA, Babey SH, Etzioni DA, Spencer BA, Brown ER, Chawla N. Cancer screening in California: findings from the 2001 California Health Interview Survey. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Los Angeles Center for Health Policy Research; 2003.
12. California Health Information Survey. CHIS 2001 Methodology series. Report 1-Sample Design. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Health Policy Reseach; 2002.
13. Dillman DA. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Design Method. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1978.
14. 2001 California Health Interview Survey Web site. Available at: http://www.chis.ucla.edu/methods.html. Accessed April 7, 2004.