Dynamic MRI contrast enhancement of renal cortex: A functional assessment of renovascular disease in patients with renal artery stenosis

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 461-466

  Gandy, Stephen J ^a   Sudarshan, Thiru A P ^a   Sheppard, Declan G ^a   Allan, Lynsay C ^a   McLeay, Trudy B ^a   Houston, J Graeme ^a  

^a NINEWELLS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cortex; Kidney; MR renography; Perfusion; Renovascular disease

Indexed keywords

GADOTERIDOL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREATH HOLDING; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; KIDNEY ARTERY STENOSIS; KIDNEY CORTEX; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RENAL ARTERY; RENOVASCULAR DISEASE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

AGED; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM; HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION, RENOVASCULAR; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KIDNEY CORTEX; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; RENAL ARTERY OBSTRUCTION;

EID: 0141841824     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10381     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ros PR, Gauger J, Stoupis C, et al. Diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: feasibility of combining MR angiography, MR renography, and gadopentetate-based measurements of glomerular filtration rate. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:1447-1451.
2. Lee VS, Rusinek H, Johnson G, Rofsky NM, Krinsky GA, Weinreb JC. MR renography with low-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine: feasibility. Radiology 2001;221:371-379.
3. Prasad PV, Goldfarb J, Sundaram C, Priatna A, Li W, Edelman RR. Captopril MR renography in a swine model: toward a comprehensive evaluation of renal arterial stenosis. Radiology 2000;217:813-818.
4. De Priester JA, Den Boer JA, Giele ELW, et al. MR renography: an algorithm for calculation and correction of cortical volume averaging in medullary renographs. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:453-459.
5. De Priester JA, Kessels AGH, Giele ELW, et al. MR renography by semiautomated image analysis: performance in renal transplant recipients. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:134-140.
6. Schoenberg SO, Bock M, Aumann S, et al. Quantitative assessment of renal function with magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology 2000;40:925-937.
7. Marcos HB, Choyke PL. Magnetic resonance angiography of the kidney. Semin Nephrol 2000;20:450-455.
8. Rofsky NM, Lee VS, Laub G, et al. Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination. Radiology 1999;212:876-884.
9. Gandy SJ, Houston JG, Sheppard DG, et al. Evaluation of renal cortical perfusion in patients with renal artery stenosis using contrast enhanced magnetic resonance renography (CE-MRR). In: In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Honolulu, 2002.
10. Buckley DL, Shurrab AE, Jones AP, Kilgallon JE, Mamtora H, Kalra PA. Quantitative assessment of renal function using dynamic Gd-DTPA enhanced MRI. In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Honolulu, 2002.
11. Coulam CH, Bouley DM, Sommer FG. Measurement of renal volumes with contrast-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;15:174-179.
12. Binkert CA, Debatin JF, Schneider E, et al. Can MR measurement of renal artery flow and renal volume predict the outcome of percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2001;24:233-239.
13. Maki J, Prince M, Londy F, Chenevert T. The effects of time varying intravenous signal intensity and k-space acquisition order on three-dimensional MR angiography image quality. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:642-651.
14. Hany TF, McKinnon GC, Leung DA, et al. Optimization of contrast timing for breath-hold three-dimensional MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:551-556.
15. Taylor J, Summers PE, Keevil SF, et al. Magnetic resonance renography: optimisation of pulse sequence parameters and Gd-DTPA dose, and comparison with radionuclide renography. Magn Reson Imaging 1997;15:637-649.
16. Bass JC, Prince MR, Londy FJ, Chenevert TL. Effect of gadolinium on phase-contrast MR angiography of the renal arteries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:261-266.
17. Qanadli SD, Soulez G, Therasse E, et al. Detection of renal artery stenosis: prospective comparison of captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography, captopril-enhanced scintigraphy and MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:1123-1129.
18. Martin LG, Rundback JH, Sacks D, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for angiography, angioplasty, and stent placement in the diagnosis and treatment of renal artery stenosis in adults. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2002;13:1069-1083.
19. Hood MN, Ho VB, Corse WR. Three-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiography: a useful clinical adjunct to gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional renal magnetic resonance angiography? Mil Med 2002;167:343-349.
20. Schoenberg SO, Knopp MV, Londy F, et al. Morphologic and functional magnetic resonance imaging of renal artery stenosis: a multireader tricenter study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002;13:158-169.