Patchy stomatal conductance: Emergent collective behaviour of stomata

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 258-262

  Mott, Keith A ^a   Buckley, Thomas N ^a  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034212491     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01648-4     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Terashima I. Anatomy of non-uniform leaf photosynthesis. Photosynth. Res. 31:1992;195-212.
2. Weyers J.D.B., Lawson T. Heterogeneity in stomatal characteristics. Adv. Bot. Res. 26:1997;317-351.
3. Beyschlag W., Eckstein J. Stomatal patchiness. Behnke K.et al. Progress in Botany. 1998;283-298 Springer-Verlag.
4. Meidner H., Mansfield T.A. The Physiology of Stomata. 1968;McGraw-Hill.
5. Jones H.G., Sutherland R.A. Stomatal control of xylem embolism. Plant Cell Environ. 14:1991;607-612.
6. Sperry J.S. Limitations of water transport and their consequences. Gartner B. Plant Stems: Physiology and Functional Morphology. 1995;105-120 Academic Press.
7. Leckie C.P.et al. Second messengers in guard cells. J. Exp. Bot. 49:1998;339-349.
8. 2+ signalling systems. Trends Plant Sci. 3:1998;32-36.
9. Wong S-C.et al. Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity. Nature. 282:1979;424-426.
10. Terashima I.et al. Characterisation of non-uniform photosynthesis induced by abscisic acid in leaves having different mesophyll anatomies. Plant Cell Physiol. 29:1988;385-394.
11. Downton W.J.S.et al. Non-uniform stomatal closure induced by water stress causes putative non-stomatal inhibition of photosynthesis. New Phytol. 110:1988;503-509.
12. Laisk A.et al. Statistical distribution of stomatal apertures of Vicia faba and Hordium vulgare and the Spannungsphase of stomatal opening. J. Exp. Bot. 31:1980;49-58.
13. Gorton H.L.et al. Repeated measurements of aperture for individual stomates. Plant Physiol. 89:1988;387-390.
14. Eckstein J.et al. Abscisic acid is not necessarily required for the induction of patchy stomatal closure. J. Exp. Biol. 49:1998;611-616.
15. Eckstein J.et al. Changes in photon flux can induce stomatal patchiness. Plant Cell Environ. 19:1996;1066-1074.
16. 2 assimilation during photosynthetic induction. Plant Cell Environ. 19:1996;1349-1358.
17. Daley P.F.et al. Topography of photosynthetic activity of leaves obtained from video images of chlorophyll fluorescence. Plant Physiol. 90:1989;1233-1238.
18. Genty B., Meyer S. Quantitative mapping of leaf photosynthesis using chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 22:1994;277-284.
19. Cardon Z.G.et al. Dynamics of patchy stomatal movements, and their contribution to steady-state and oscillating stomatal conductance calculated with gas-exchange techniques. Plant Cell Environ. 17:1994;995-1008.
20. Siebke K., Weis E. 'Assimilation images' of leaves of Glechoma hederacea; analysis of non-synchronous stomata related oscillations. Planta. 196:1995;155-165.
21. Mott K.A.et al. Asymmetric patchy stomatal closure for the two surfaces of Xanthium strumarium L. leaves at low humidity. Plant Cell Environ. 16:1993;25-34.
22. Haefner J.W.et al. A spatially explicit model of patchy stomatal responses to humidity. Plant Cell Environ. 20:1997;1087-1097.
23. Buckley T.N.et al. Carbon-water balance and patchy stomatal conductance. Oecologia. 118:1999;132-143.
24. Beyschlag W., Pfanz H. A fast method to detect the occurrence of nonhomogenous distribution of stomatal aperture in heterobaric plant leaves. Experiments with Arbutus unedo L. during the diurnal course. Oecologia. 82:1992;52-55.
25. Lawson T.et al. The nature of heterogeneity in the stomatal behavior of Phaseolus vulgaris L. primary leaves. J. Exp. Bot. 49:1998;1387-1395.
26. 2 diffusion. Planta. 210:1999;126-131.
27. Jones H.G. Use of thermography for quantitative studies of spatial and temporal variation of stomatal conductance over leaf surfaces. Plant Cell Environ. 22:1999;1043-1055.
28. Sharpe P.J.H.et al. Stomatal mechanics. Zeiger E.et al. Stomatal Function. 1987;91-114 Stanford University Press.
29. Franks P.J.et al. A study of stomatal mechanics using the cell pressure probe. Plant Cell Environ. 21:1998;94-100.
30. Cowan I.R. Oscillations in stomatal conductance and plant functioning associated with stomatal conductance: observations and a model. Planta. 106:1972;185-219.
31. Delwiche M.J., Cooke J.R. An analytical model of the hydraulic aspects of stomatal dynamics. J.Theor. Biol. 69:1977;113-141.
32. Mott K.A.et al. Interactions among stomata in response to perturbations in humidity. Plant Cell Environ. 20:1997;1098-1107.
33. Mott K.A.et al. Effects of humidity on light-induced stomatal opening: evidence for hydraulic coupling among stomata. J. Exp. Bot. 50:1999;1207-1213.
34. Mott K.A., Buckley T.N. Stomatal heterogeneity. J. Exp. Bot. 49:1998;407-417.
35. Buckley T.N., Mott K.A. Stomatal responses to non-local changes in PFD: evidence for long-distance hydraulic interactions. Plant Cell Environ. 23:2000;301-309.
36. Kaufmann S. At Home in the Universe. 1995;Oxford University Press.
37. Farquhar G.D. Models of integrated photosynthesis of cells and leaves. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 323:1989;357-367.
38. McNaughton K.G., Jarvis P.G. Effects of spatial scale on stomatal control of transpiration. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 54:1991;279-301.