Examining the role of Web site information in facilitating different citizen-government relationships: A case study of state Chronic Wasting Disease Web sites

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 64-88

  Eschenfelder, Kristin R ^a   Miller, Clark A ^b  

^a University of Wisconsin   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845260354     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2006.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Angers R., Browning S., Seward T., Sigurdson C., Miller M., Hoover E., and G.C. Prions in skeletal muscles of deer with chronic wasting disease. Science Express (2006, January 26) 10.1126/science.1122864
2. Barnes S., and Vidgen R. Interactive e-government: Evaluating the Web site of the UK inland revenue. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations 2 1 (2004) 42-63
3. Bastian F., Dash S., and Garry R. Linking chronic wasting disease to scrapie by comparison of spiroplasmamirium ribosomal DNA sequences. Experimental and Molecular Pathology 77 (2004) 49-56
4. Bimber B. Information and American democracy: Technology in the evolution of political power (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK See "4th Information Revolution" stage pp. 21-23
5. Bishop R. The economic impacts of chronic wasting disease (CWD) in Wisconsin. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 9 3 (2004) 181-192
6. Bosque P. Can humans contract chronic wasting disease?. Presented at The Second International Chronic Wasting Disease Symposium, Madison, WI (July 2005)
7. Burkell J. What are the chances? Evaluating risk and benefit information in consumer health materials. Journal of the Medical Library Association 92 2 (2004) 200-208
8. Chadwick A., and May C. Interaction between states and citizens in the age of the Internet: "E-government" in the United States, Britain, and the European Union. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions 16 2 (2003) 271-300
9. Chase L.C., Schusler T.M., and Decker D.J. Innovations in stakeholder involvement: What's the next step?. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28 1 (2000) 208-217
10. Clark W., Nusser S., Huang L.O., and D.L. Evaluating sampling approaches for monitoring chronic wasting disease in deer populations. Presented at CWD surveillance issues. The Second International Chronic Wasting Disease Symposium, Madison, WI (2005, July)
11. Clayton T., and Gregory S. The new face of government: citizen-initiated contacts in the era of e-government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13 1 (2003) 83-102
12. Covello V., McCallum D., and Pavlova M. Effective risk communication: The role and responsibility of government and nongovernment organizations (1987), Plenum, New York
13. Cullen R., and Houghton C. Democracy online: An assessment of New Zealand Government Web sites. Government Information Quarterly 17 3 (2000) 243-267
14. Decker D., and Chase L. Stakeholder involvement: Seeking solutions in changing times. In: Decker D., Brown T., and Siemer W. (Eds). Human Dimensions of Wildlife in North America (2001), The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, MD 133-152
15. Eschenfelder K. Behind the Website: A field study of the management of textual content on state agency Websites. Government Information Quarterly 21 (2004) 337-358
16. Eschenfelder K., Beachboard J., McClure C., and Wyman. Assessing US. federal government Websites. Government Information Quarterly 14 2 (1997) 173-190
17. Fountain J.E. Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change (2001), Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC
18. Heberlein T. "Fire in the Sistine Chapel": How Wisconsin responded to chronic wasting disease. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 9 3 (2004) 165-180
19. Jasanoff S. The fifth branch: Science advisers as policymakers (1994), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
20. Joly D.O. An overview of logistical, theoretical, and statistical issues surrounding chronic wasting disease surveillance. Paper presented at The Second International Chronic Wasting Disease Symposium, Madison, WI (2005)
21. Kim P., Halligan J., Cho N., Oh C., and Eikenberry A. Toward participatory and transparent governance: Report on the sixth global forum on reinventing government. Public Administration Review 65 6 (2005) 646-654
22. La Porte T., Demchak C., and de Jong M. Democracy and bureaucracy in the age of the Web: Empirical findings and theoretical speculations. Administration and Society 34 4 (2002) 411-446
23. K. Layne, J. Lee, (2001). Developing a fully functional e-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18, 122-136.
24. Lee M. E-reporting: Strengthening democratic accountability (2004), IBM Center for the Business of Government, Washington, DC
25. Leonard, P. (2003). Promoting welfare? Government information policy and social citizenship. University of Bristol, Bristol UK: The Policy Press.
26. Moon M. The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality?. Public Administration Review 62 4 (2002) 424-440
27. Musso J., Weare C., and Hale M. Designing good Web technologies for local governance reform: Good management or good democracy?. Political Communication 17 (2000) 1-19
28. National Research Council. Understanding risk: Informing decisions in a democratic society (1996), National Academy Press, Washington, DC see appendix B
29. National Research Council. Improving risk communication (1989), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
30. Needham M., Vaske J., and Manfredo M. Hunters' behavior and acceptance of management actions related to chronic wasting disease in eight states. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 9 3 (2004) 211-232
31. Needham M., Vaske J., and Manfredo M. Hunters' response to chronic wasting disease: Regional and state specific results. Project Report for the Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies No. Report Number 56 (2005), Colorado State University, Human Dimensions in Natural Resources Unit, Fort Collins
32. Norris D., and Moon M. Advancing e-government and the grassroots: Tortoise or hare?. Public Administration Review 65 1 (2005) 64-75
33. Nye J., Zelikow P., and King D. Why people don't trust government (1997), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
34. Office of Management and Budget. Guidelines for ensuring and maximizing the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of information disseminated by federal agencies; republication. Federal Register 67 (2002) 8452 (Feb. 22)
35. Roberts N. Public deliberation: An alternative approach to crafting policy and setting direction. Public Administration Review 57 (1997) 124-132
36. Seidl A., and Koontz S. Potential economic impacts of chronic wasting disease in Colorado. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 9 3 (2004) 241-245
37. Shulman S. E-rulemaking: Issues in current research and practice. International Journal of Public Administration 28 7/8 (2005) 621-641
38. Sprehe T. OMB Circular No. A-130, the management of federal information resources: Its origins and impact. Government Information Quarterly 4 2 (1987) 189-196
39. State of Wisconsin Conservation Department. Wisconsin's deer problem: Wisconsin deer today and tomorrow (1943), State of Wisconsin Conservation Department, Madison, WI Publication# 321
40. Stvilia B., Twidale M., Smith L., and Gasser L. Assessing information quality of a community-based encyclopedia. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Quality (2005) 442-454 Cambridge, MA
41. U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2002a). Questions and answers about chronic wasting disease. Retrieved April 29, 2006, from http://www.aphis.usda.gov/lpa/pubs/fsheet_faq_notice/faq_ahcwd.html.
42. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Plan for assisting states, federal agencies, and tribes in managing chronic wasting disease in wild and captive cervids (agency task force report) (2002), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC
43. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Implementation document for plan for assisting states, federal agencies and tribes in managing chronic wasting disease in wild and captive herds (2002), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC
44. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Progress report on the plan for assisting states, federal agencies and tribes in managing chronic wasting disease in wild and captive cervids (2004), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington DC
45. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Multi-state guidelines for chronic wasting disease management in free-ranging white-tailed deer, mule deer, and elk (2004), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC
46. Vaske J., Timmons N., Beaman J., and Petchenik J. Chronic wasting disease in Wisconsin: Hunter behavior, perceived risk, and agency trust. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 9 3 (2004) 193-210
47. Vigoda E. From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens and the next generation of public administration. Public Administration Review 62 5 (2002) 527-540
48. Walters J. U.S. government publication: Ideological development and institutional politics from the founding to 1970 (2005), Scarecrow Press, Lanham, MD
49. Weiss J., and Tschirhart M. Public information campaigns as policy instruments. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 13 1 (1994) 82-119
50. Welch E., and Fulla S. Virtual interactivity between government and citizens: The Chicago Police Department's citizen ICAM application demonstration case. Political Communication 22 2 (2005) 215-236
51. West D. Digital government (2005), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
52. Wynne B. Misunderstood misunderstandings: Social identities and public uptake of science. In: Irwin A., and Wynne B. (Eds). Misunderstanding science?: The public reconstruction of science and technology (1996), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge