Information-seeking behavior of faculty in one school of public health

Journal of the Medical Library Association

Volumn 94, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 442-446

  Wallis, Lisa C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; E-MAIL; HUMAN; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; LIBRARIAN; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; UNIVERSITY;

CHICAGO; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; FACULTY; FORECASTING; HUMANS; INTERNET; LIBRARY SERVICES; LIBRARY SURVEYS; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; ONLINE SYSTEMS; SCHOOLS, PUBLIC HEALTH;

EID: 33751546357     PISSN: 15365050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. LEE P, GIUSE NB, SATHE NA. Benchmarking information needs and use in the Tennessee public health community. J Med Libr Assoc 2003 Jul;91(3):322-36.
2. Information needs and uses of the public health workforce - Washington, 1997-1998. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep [serial online]. 2000 Feb 18;49(6):118-20. 〈http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4906a3.htm〉.
3. WALTON LJ, HASSON S, ROSS FV, MARTIN ER. Outreach to public health professionals: lessons learned from a collaborative Iowa public health project. Bull Med Libr Assoc 2000;88(2):165-71.
4. TELLEEN S, MARTIN E. Improving information access for public health professionals. J Med Syst 2002 Dec;26(6):529-43.
5. HINK R. Member schools. [Web document]. Washington, DC: Association of Schools of Public Health, 2003 Feb 2. [updated 24 Mar 2004; cited 30 Jun 2005]. 〈http://asph.org/document.cfm?page=301〉.
6. UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO, SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH. Divisions. [Web document]. Chicago, IL: The University, c2004. [cited 2005 Jun 30]. 〈http://www.uic.edu/sph/divisions.htm〉.
7. SOW MK. 2004 annual data report. [Web document]. Washington, DC: Association of Schools of Public Health, 2005 Jun:74 p. [cited 29 Jun 2005]. 〈http://www.asph.org/userfiles/ADR2004.pdf〉.
8. DAVES R. AAPOR outcome rate calculator, version 2.1. [Web document]. Lenexa, KS: American Association for Public Opinion Research, c 2002. [cited 5 Jan 2005]. 〈http://www.aapor.org/Calculator.xls〉.
9. SCHONLAU M, FRICKER RD, ELLIOTT MN. Conducting research surveys via e-mail and the Web. [Web document]. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2001. [cited 1 Mar 2005]. 〈http://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR1480/〉.
10. JANKOWSKA MA. Identifying university professors' information needs in the challenging environment of information and communication technologies. J Acad Librariansh 2004 Jan;30(1):51-66.
11. ZHANG W. Analyzing faculty & staff's information needs and use of electronic technologies: a liberal arts college's perspective. J Educ Media Libr Sci 1998 Mar;35(3):218-1.
12. ADAMS JA, BONK SC. Electronic information technologies and resources: use by university faculty and faculty preferences for related library services. Coll Res Libr 1995 Mar;56:119-31.
13. SCOLLIN P. A study of factors related to the use of online resources by nurse educators. Comp Nurs 2001 Nov/Dec; 19(6):249-56.
14. STARKWEATHER WM, WALLIN CC. Faculty response to library technology: insights on attitudes. Libr Trends 1999 Spring;47(4):640-68.
15. GRAHAM K, GRODZINSKI A. Defining the remote library user: an online survey portal. Libr Acad 2001; 1(3):289-308.
16. FRANKLIN B, PLUM T. Library usage patterns in the electronic information environment. Inf Res [serial online]. 2004; 9(4):paper 187. [cited 19 Aug 2004]. 〈http://informationr.net/ir/9-4/paper187.html〉.