Una visión crítica del enfoque de los heurísticos rápidos y frugales

Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologia

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 509-522

  García Retamero, Rocio ^a   Dieckmann, Anja ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

Author keywords

Building blocks; Decision making; Fast and frugal heuristics; Selection of information

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751509721     PISSN: 01200534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Ahn, W. & Kalish, C. W. (2000). The role of mechanism beliefs in causal reasoning. In F. C. Keil & R. A. Wilson (Eds.), Explanation and cognition (pp. 199-225). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Ardila, R., Pérez-Acosta, A. M. & Gutiérrez, G. (2005). Psicología del aprendizaje: Investigación básica publicada en revistas iberoamericanas indexadas. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 37, 595-615.
3. Bentley, J. L. & McGeoch, C. C. (1985). Amortized analyses of self-organizing sequential search heuristics. Communications of the ACM, 28, 404-411.
4. Boyle, P. (1997). Cancer, cigarette smoking and premature death in Europe : A review including the recommendations of European cancer experts consensus meeting, Helsinki, October 1996. Lung Cancer, 17, 1-60.
5. Brehmer, B. (1973). Note on the relation between single-cue probability learning and multiple-cue probability learning. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 9, 246-252.
6. Brehmer, B. (1994). The psychology of linear judgment models. Acta Psychologica, 87, 137-154.
7. Bröder, A. (2000). Assessing the empirical validity of the "Take-The-Best" heuristic as a model of human probabilistic inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 26, 1332-1346.
8. Bröder, A. & Schiffer, S. (2003). Take The Best versus simultaneous feature matching: Probabilistic inferences from memory and effects of representation format. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 132, 277-293.
9. Castellan, N. J. (1973). Multiple-cue probability learning with irrelevant cues. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 9, 16-29.
10. Czerlinski, J., Gigerenzer, G. & Goldstein, D. G. (1999). How good are simple heuristics? In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, & the ABC Research Group, Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 97-118). New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Dieckmann, A. & Rieskamp, J. (2006). The influence of information redundancy on probabilistic inferences. Manuscript under review.
12. Dieckmann, A. & Todd, P. M. (2004). Simple ways to construct search orders. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 309-314). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Edgell, S. E. & Hennessey, J. E. (1980). Irrelevant information and utilization of event base rates in nonmetric multiple-cue probability learning. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 26, 1-6.
14. Einhorn, H. J. (1980). Learning from experience and suboptimal rules in decision making. In T. W. Wallsten (Ed.), Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior (pp. 1-20). New Jersey: Erlbaum.
15. Fariña, F., Arce, R. & Novo, M. (2002). Heurfstico de anclaje en las decisiones judiciales. Psicothema, 14, 39-46.
16. Feeney, A. (2000). Simple heuristics: From one infinite regress to another? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 749-750.
17. García-Retamero, R. (en prensa a). Identidad de género y nivel de aspiraciones profesionales en alumnos universitarios. Revista Mexicana de Psicología.
18. García-Retamero, R. (in press b). The influence of knowledge about causal mechanisms on compound processing. The Psychological Record.
19. García-Retamero, R. & Hoffrage, U. (in press). How causal knowledge simplifies decision making. Minds & Machines.
20. García-Retamero, R., Hoffrage, U. & Dieckmann, A. (in press a). When one cue is not enough: Combining fast and frugal heuristics with compound cue processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
21. García-Retamero, R., Hoffrage, U., Dieckmann, A. & Ramos, M. (in press b). Compound cue processing within the fast and frugal heuristic approach in non-linearly separable environments. Learning & Motivation.
22. García-Retamero, R. & López-Zafra, R. (en prensa). Congruencia de roi de género y liderazgo: El papel de las atribuciones causales sobre el éxito y el fracaso. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología.
23. th annual conference of the cognitive science society, (pp. 1352-1358). Mahwah, New Jersey, USA.
24. García-Retamero, R., Wallin, A. & Dieckmann, A. (2006b). Does causality help us be faster and more frugal in our decisions? Manuscript submitted for publication.
25. Gigerenzer, G. (2001). The adaptive toolbox. In G. Gigerenzer, & R. Selten (Eds.), Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox (pp. 37-50). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Gigerenzer, G. & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103, 650-669.
27. Gigerenzer, G. & Goldstein, D. G. (1999). Betting on one good reason: The Take The Best heuristic. In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, & the ABC Research Group, Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 75-95). New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Gigerenzer, G. & Selten, R. (2001). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M. & the ABC Research Group (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Goldstein, D. G. & Gigerenzer, G. (1999). The recognition heuristic: How ignorance makes us smart. In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, & the ABC Research Group, Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 37-58). New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Goldstein, D. G, & Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psychological Review, 109, 75-90.
32. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1984). Automatic processing of fundamental information: The case of frequency of occurrence. American Psychologist, 39, 1372-1388.
33. Hastie, R. & Kameda, T. (2005). The robust beauty of majority rules in group decisions. Psychological Review, 112, 494-508.
34. Jara, E., Vila, J. & Maldonado, A. (2005). Condicionamiento de Segundo orden: Generalidad y valor teórico. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 22, 193-209.
35. Juslin, P. & Persson, M. (2002). PROBabilities from EXemplars (PROBEX): A "lazy" algorithm for probabilistic inference from generic knowledge. Cognitive Science, 26, 563-607.
36. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgments under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37. Kruschke, J. K. & Johansen, M. K. (1999). A model of probabilistic category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 1083-1119.
38. Luce, R. D. (2000). Fast, frugal, and surprisingly accurate heuristics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 757-758.
39. Martignon, L. & Hoffrage, U. (1999). Why does one-reason decision making work?: A case study in ecological rationality. In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, & the ABC Research Group, Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 119-140). New York: Oxford University Press.
40. Martignon, L. & Hoffrage, U. (2002). Fast, frugal, and fit: Simple heuristics for paired comparison. Theory & Decision, 52, 29-71.
41. Morton. A. (2000). Heuristics all the way up? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 758-759.
42. Newell, B. R., Rakow, T., Weston, N. J. & Shanks, D. R. (2004). Search strategies in decision making: The success of "success." Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17, 117-137.
43. Newell, B. R. & Shanks, D. R. (2003). Take The Best or look at the rest? Factors influencing "one-reason" decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 53-65.
44. Newell, B. R., Weston, N. J. & Shanks, D. R. (2003). Empirical tests of afast-and-frugal heuristic: Not everyone "Takes-The-Best." Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 82-96.
45. Newstead, S. E. (2000). What is an ecologically rational heuristic? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 759-760.
46. Rieskamp, J. & Otto, P. E. (2006). SSL: A theory of how people learn to select strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 207-236.
47. Rivest, R. (1976). On self-organizing sequential search heuristics. Communications of the ACM, 19, 63-67.
48. Shanks, D. R. (1991). Categorization by a connectionist network. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 433-443.
49. Shanks, D. R. & Lagnado, D. (2000). Sub-optimal reasons for rejecting optimality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 761-762.
50. Simon, H. A. (1990). Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 1-19.
51. Todd, P. M. & Dieckmann, A. (2005). Heuristics for ordering cue search in decision making. In L. K. Saul, Y. Weiss, & L. Bottou (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 1393-1400). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Todd, P. M. & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Précis of simple heuristics that make us smart. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, 727-780.
53. Tubau, E. & Alsonso, D. (2002). Inferencias bayesianas: Una revisión teórica. Anuario de Psicología, 33, 25-48.
54. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgments under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
55. Wallin, A. & Gärdenfors, P. (2000). Smart people who make simple heuristics work. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 765.