Firm- and individual-level determinants of balanced scorecard usage;Déterminants de l'usage du tableau de bord équilibré au double échelon organisational et individuel

Canadian Accounting Perspectives

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 181-207

  Islam, Majidul ^a   Kellermanns, Franz W ^b  

^a Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science   (Canada)

^b MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Balanced scorecard (BSC); BSC adoption; BSC implementation; Technology acceptance model (TAM)

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751502485     PISSN: 14998653     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1506/74LJ-CMWM-FUAD-NMUT     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Abrahamson, E. 1996. Management fashion. Academy of Management Review 21 (1): 254-85.
2. Adams, D. A., R. R. Nelson, and P. A. Todd. 1992. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly 16 (2): 227-47.
3. Agarwal, R., and J. Prasad. 1997. The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sciences 28 (3): 557-82.
4. Anderson, S. W. 1995. A framework for assessing cost management system changes: The case of activity-based costing. Journal of Management Accounting Research 7: 1-51.
5. Anderson, S. W., and S. Young. 1999. The impact of contextual and process factors on the evaluation of activity-based cost systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society 24 (7): 525-59.
6. Atkinson, A. A., R. D. Banker, R. S. Kaplan, and S. M. Young. 1997. Management accounting. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7. Banker, R. D., and S. M. Datar. 1989. Sensitivity, precision, and linear aggregation of signals. Journal of Accounting Research 27 (1): 21-40.
8. Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17(1): 99-120.
9. Burgelman, R. A. 2002. Strategy is destiny: How strategy-making shapes a company's future. New York: Free Press.
10. Carleton, J. M. 2004. A cognitive approach to explaining entrepreneur's assessment of new venture internationalization. Working paper, Georgia State University.
11. Chenhall, R. H. 2004. The role of cognitive and affective conflict in early implementation of activity-based cost management. Behavioral Research in Accounting 16: 19-44.
12. Chuan-Chaun Lin, J., and H. Lu. 2000. Towards an understanding of the behavioral intention to use a web site. International Journal of Information Management 20 (3): 197-208.
13. Clinton, B.D., and J. E. Hunton. 2001. Linking participative budgeting congruence to organizational performance. Behavioral Research in Accounting 13: 127-41.
14. Cohen, J., and P. Cohen. 1993. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis of behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
15. Cohen, W., and D. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1): 128-52.
16. Cyert, R. M., and J. G. March. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm, 2nd ed. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
17. Davis, F. 1986. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new-end-user information systems: Theory and results. Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, MIT.
18. Davis, F. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13 (3): 319-40.
19. Davis, F. D., R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35 (8): 982-1003.
20. Dess, G. G., and R. B. Robinson. 1984. Industry effects and strategic management research. Journal of Management 16 (7): 7-27.
21. Dierickx, I., and K. Cool. 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science 35 (12): 1504-14.
22. Dilla, W. N., and P. J. Steinbart. 2005. Relative weighting of common and unique balanced scorecard measures by knowledgeable decision makers. Behavioral Research in Accounting 17:43-54.
23. Dutton, J. E., and R. B. Duncan. 1987. The creation of momentum for change through the process of strategic issue diagnosis. Strategic Management Journal 8 (3): 279-95.
24. Dutton, J. E., S. A., Stumph, and D. Wagner. 1990. Diagnosing strategic issues and managerial investment of resources. Advances in Strategic Management 6: 143-67.
25. Elnathan, D., L. W. Thomas, and S. M. Young. 1996. Benchmarking and management accounting: A framework for research. Journal of Management Accounting Research 8: 37-50
26. Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 1975. Attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addision-Wesley.
27. Frigo, M. L. 2003. Strategy, value creation and the CFO. Strategic Finance 84 (7): 7-10.
28. Ghosh, D., and R. F. Lusch. 2000. Outcome effect, controllability and performance evaluation of managers: Some field evidence from multi-outlet businesses. Accounting, Organizations and Society 25 (4-5): 411-25.
29. Ginsberg, A., and N. Venkatraman. 1995. Institutional initiatives for technological change: From issue interpretation to strategic choice. Organization Studies 16 (3): 425-48.
30. Goodman, M. B. 1998. Corporate communications for executives. Albany, NY: Sunny Press.
31. Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 481-510.
32. Hamel, G., and C. K. Prahalad. 1993. Strategy as stretch and leverage. Harvard Business Review 71 (2): 63-76.
33. Hawkins, S. A., and R. Hastie. 1990. Hindsight: Biased judgment of past events after outcomes are known. Psychological Bulletin 107 (3): 311-27.
34. Higgins, M. C. 2001. Changing carriers: The effect of social context. Journal of Organizational Behavior 22 (6): 595-618.
35. Hong, W., J. Y. L. Thong, W. M. Wong, and K. Y. Tarn. 2001. Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: An empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems 18 (3): 97-124.
36. Hoque, Z., and W. James. 2000. Linking balanced scorecard measures to size and market factors: Impact on organizational performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research 12:1-17.
37. Hu, L. T., and P. M. Bentler. 1995. Evaluating model fit. In Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, ed. R. H. Hoyle, 76-99. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Igbaria, M. 1993. User acceptance of microcomputer technology: An empirical test. OMEGA International Journal of Management Science 21 (1): 73-90.
39. Ittner, C. D., and D. F. Larcker. 1998. Innovations in performance measurement: Trends and research implications. Journal of Management Accounting Research 10: 205-38.
40. Ittner, C. D., D. F. Larcker, and M. W. Meyer. 2003. Subjectivity and the weighting of performance measures: Evidence from a balanced scorecard. The Accounting Review 78 (3): 725-58.
41. Jackson, C. M., S. Chow, and R. A. Leitch. 1997. Towards an understanding of the behavioral intention to use an information system. Decision Sciences 28 (2): 357-87.
42. Jackson, S. E., and J. E. Dutton. 1988. Discerning threats and opportunities. Administrative Science Quarterly 33 (3): 370-87.
43. Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. 1996. The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
44. Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. 2001. The strategy focused organization: How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
45. Karahanna, E., and D. W. Straub. 1999. The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use. Information & Management 35 (4): 237-50.
46. Karahanna, E., D. W. Straub, and N. L. Chervany. 1999. Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly 23 (2): 183-213.
47. Kennedy, T., and J. Affleck-Graves. 2001. The impact of activity-based costing techniques on firm performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research 13: 19-46.
48. Ketchang, A. A., and J. R. Strawser. 2001. Multiple dimensions of organizational commitment: Implications for future accounting research. Behavioral Research in Accounting 13: 221-51.
49. Kiesler, S., and L. Sproull. 1982. Managerial responses to changing environments: Perspectives on problem sensing from social cognition. Administrative Science Quarterly 27 (4): 548-70.
50. Kline, R. B. 1998. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
51. Kotter, J. 1995. Leading change: Why transformation fails. Harvard Business Review 73 (2): 59-67.
52. Lederer, A. L., D. J. Maupin, M. P. Sena, and Y. Zhuang. 2000. The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web. Decision Support Systems 29 (3): 269-82.
53. Lewin, K. 1951. Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Row.
54. Libby, R., and J. Luft. 1993. Determinants of judgement performance in accounting settings: Ability, knowledge, motivation and environment. Accounting, Organizations and Society 18 (5): 425-50.
55. Lipe, M. G., and S. E. Salterio. 2000. The balanced scorecard: Judgmental effects of common and unique performance measures. The Accounting Review 75 (3): 283-98.
56. Love, L. G., R. L. Priem, and G. T. Lumpkin. 2002. Explicitly articulated strategy and firm performance under alternative levels of centralization. Journal of Management 28 (5): 611-27.
57. Malina, M. A., and F. H. Selto. 2001. Communicating and controlling strategy: An empirical study of the effectiveness of the balanced scorecard. Journal of Management Accounting Research 13:47-90.
58. Malmi, T. 2001. Balanced scorecard in Finnish companies: A research note. Management Accounting Research 12 (2): 207-20.
59. Martins, L., and F. W. Kellermanns. 2004. Student acceptance of a web-based course management system. Academy of Management Learning and Education 3 (1): 7-26.
60. Meyer, J. W., and B. Rowan. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 364-85.
61. Miller, L. E., and J. E. Grush. 1988. Improving predictions in expectancy theory research: Effects of personality, expectancies, and norms. Academy of Management Journal 31 (1): 107-22.
62. Mulaik, S. A., L. R. James, J. V. Alstine, N. Bennett, S. Ling, and C. D. Stilwell. 1989. Evaluation of goodness-of-fit for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin 105 (3): 430-45.
63. Nambisan, S., R. Agarwal, and M. Tanniru. 1999. Organizational mechanisms for enhancing user innovation in information technology. MIS Quarterly 23 (3): 365-95.
64. Nambisan, S., and W. Yu-Ming. 1999. Roadblocks to web technology adoption? Communications of the ACM 42(1):98-9.
65. Niven, P. R. 2002. Balanced scorecard step-by-step: Maximizing performance and maintaining results. New York: Wiley.
66. Nohria, N., and R. Gulati. 1996. Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal 39 (5): 1245-64.
67. Parmenter, D. 2003. Balanced scorecard. Accountancy Ireland 35 (1): 14-7.
68. Pedhazur, E. J. 1997. Multiple regressions in behavioral research. Explanations and predictions, 3rd ed. Singapore: Wadsworth-Thompson Learning.
69. Podsakoff, P. M., and D. W. Organ. 1986. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and perspectives. Journal of Management 12 (4): 531-44.
70. Porter, L. W., R. M. Steers, and R. T. Mowday. 1974. Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology 59 (5): 603-9.
71. Radcliffe, V. S., D. R. Campbell, and T. J. Fogarty. 2001. Exploring downsizing: A case study on the use of accounting information. Journal of Management Accounting Research 13: 131-60.
72. Rickards, R. C. 2003. Setting benchmarks and evaluating balanced scorecards with data envelopment analysis. Benchmarking: An International Journal 10 (3): 226-45.
73. Ritter, M. 2003. The use of balanced scorecards in the strategic management of corporate communication. Corporate Communications 8 (1): 44-59.
74. Roberts, M. L., T. L. Albright, and A. R. Hibbets. 2004. Debiasing balanced scorecard evaluations. Behavioral Research in Accounting 16: 75-88.
75. Said, A. A., H. R. HassabElnaby, and B. Weir. 2003. An empirical investigation of the performance consequences of nonfinancial measures. Journal of Management Accounting Research 15: 193-223.
76. Shields, M. D. 1995. An empirical analysis of firms' implementation experiences with activity-based costing. Journal of Management Accounting Research 7: 148-66.
77. Shields, M. D., and M. A. McEwen. 1996. Implementing activity-based- costing systems successfully. Journal of Cost Management 9 (4): 15-22.
78. Szajna, B. 1996. Empirical evaluation of the revised technological acceptance model. Management Science 42 (1): 85-92.
79. Tabachnick, B. G., and L. S. Fidell. 1995. Using multivariate statistics, 3rd ed. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
80. Tansey, R., M. White, R. Long, and M. Smith. 1996. A comparison of loglinear modeling and logistic regression in management research. Journal of Management 22 (2): 339-58.
81. Taylor, S., and P. A. Todd. 1995. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research 6 (2): 144-76.
82. Thomas, J. B., and R. R. McDaniel Jr. 1990. Interpreting strategic issues: Effects of strategy and the information-processing structure of top management teams. Academy of Management Journal 33 (2): 286-306.
83. Tucker, M. L., G. D. Meyer, and J. W. Westerman. 1996. Organizational communication: Development of internal strategic competitive advantage. Journal of Business Communication 33(1): 51-69.
84. Tymon, W. G., D. E. Stout, and K. N. Shaw. 1998. Critical analysis and recommendations regarding the role of perceived environmental uncertainty in behavioral accounting research. Behavioral Research in Accounting 10: 23-46.
85. Venkatesh, V. 2000. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research 11 (4): 342-65.
86. Venkatesh, V., and F. D. Davis. 1996. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences 27 (2): 451-81.
87. Venkatesh, V., and F. D. Davis. 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology adoption model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 46 (2): 186-204.
88. Vroom, V. H. 1964. Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
89. Weick, K. E. 1979. The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
90. Wongrassamee, S., P. D. Gardiner, and J. E. L. Simmons. 2003. Performance measurement tools: The balanced scorecard and the EFQM excellence model. Measuring Business Excellence 1 (1): 14-30.