A blended training approach using videoconferencing for distance education

Journal of the Medical Library Association

Volumn 94, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 464-468

  Locatis, Craig ^a   Gaines, Cynthia ^a   Liu, Wei Li ^a   Gill, Michael ^a   Carney, John ^b   Foster, Jaimela ^b   McCall, Valerie ^c   Woods, Michelle ^c  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b CHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE   (United States)

^c King Drew Medical Magnet High School   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTINUING EDUCATION; EDUCATION PROGRAM; HEALTH SCIENCE; HUMAN; MASS COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; VIDEOCONFERENCING;

COMMUNITY-INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; EDUCATION, DISTANCE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMANS; NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE (U.S.); PILOT PROJECTS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENTS; UNITED STATES; VIDEOCONFERENCING;

EID: 33751501448     PISSN: 15365050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. RUIZ J, MINTZER M, LEIPZIG R. The impact of e-learning in medical education. Acad Med 2006 Mar;81(3):207-12.
2. WARNER DG, OLNEY CA, WOOD FB, HANSEN L, BOWDEN VM. High school peer tutors teach Medline Plus: a model for Hispanic outreach. J Med Libr Assoc 2005 Apr;93(2):243-52.
3. LOCATIS C, FONTELO P, SNEIDERMAN C, ACKERMAN M, UIJTDEHAAGE S, CANDLER C, STENSAAS S, DENNIS D. Web-casting videoconferences over IP: a synchronous communication experiment. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003; 10:150-3.
4. HANSON D, MAUSHAK N, SCHLOSSER C, ANDERSEN M, SIMONSON M. Distance education: a review of the literature. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 1997.
5. BERGE Z. Active, interactive and reflective learning. Quart Rev Dist Ed 2002; 3(2):181-90.
6. SIMONSON M. In case you're asked: the effectiveness of distance education. Quart Rev Dist Ed 2002; 3(4):vii.
7. MACHTIMES K, ASHER W. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of telecourses in distance education. Am J Dist Ed 2000; 14(1):27-45.
8. CHENG H, LEHMAN J, ARMSTRONG P. Comparison of performance and attitude in traditional and computer conferencing classes. Am J Dist Ed 1991; 5(3):51-64.
9. MOORE M. What does research say about the learners using computer-mediated communication in distance learning? Am J Dist Ed 2002; 16(2):61-4.
10. GUNAWARDENA C, ZITTLE F. Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. Am J Dist Ed 1997; 11(3):8-26.
11. TU C, MCISAAC M. The relationship between social presence and interaction in online classes. Am J Dist Ed 2002; 16(3):131-50.
12. MOORE M. Towards a theory of independent learning and teaching. J High Ed 1973; 44:661-79.
13. MOORE M, KEARSLEY G. Distance education: a systems view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1996.
14. ROVAI A, LUCKING R. Sense of community in a highereducation television-based distance education program. Ed Tech Res & Dev 2003; 51(2):5-16.
15. CHEN Y, WILLETS F. Dimensions of educational transactions in a videoconferencing learning environment. Am J Dist Ed 1999; 13(1):45-59.
16. KELSEY K. Participant interaction in a course delivered by interactive compressed video technology. Am J Dist Ed 2000; 14(1):63-73.
17. MILLS O, BATES J, PENDLETON V, LESE K, TATARKO M. Distance education by interactive videoconference in a family practice residency center. In: Moore M, Savrock J, eds. Distance education in the health sciences. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2001:7-15.
18. COMEAUX P. The impact of an interactive distance learning network on classroom communication. Com Ed 1995; 44: 352-61.
19. FULFORD C, ZHANG S. Perceptions of interaction: the critical predictor in distance education. Am J Dist Ed 2002; 7(3): 9-21.
20. LITZELMAN D, STRATOS G, MARRIOTT D, SKEFF K. Factorial validation of a widely disseminated educational framework for evaluating clinical teachers. Acad Med 1998 Jun; 73(6):688-95.