Validation of the French version of the team reflexivity scale of Carter and West, 1998;Validation de la version française de l'échelle de réflexivité en groupe de Carter et West, 1998

Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 291-306

  Facchin, S ^a   Tschan, F ^a   Gurtner, A ^a   Cohen, D ^a   Dupuis, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Reflexivity; Scale validation; Team performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751409186     PISSN: 14202530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pto.2006.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. er édition américaine par M. Aussanaire et P. Garcia-Melgares (2002), De Boeck Université, Paris
2. Arrow H., McGrath J.E., and Berdahl J.L. Small groups as complex systems. Formation, coordination, development, and adaptation (2000), Sage, Thousand Oaks
3. Beehr T.A. Social support as a form of treatment. In: Beehr T.A. (Ed). Psychological stress in the workplace (1995), Routledge, New York 182-210
4. Byrne B.M. Structural equation modeling with amos. Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2001), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, London
5. Carnevale P.J., and Probst T.M. Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 (1998) 1300-1309
6. Carter S.M., and West M.A. Reflexivity, effectiveness, and mental health in BBC-TV productions teams. Small Group Research 29 (1998) 583-601
7. Catell R.B. The scree test for number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1 (1966) 245-276
8. De Dreu C.K.W. Team innovation and team effectiveness: the importance of minority dissent and reflexivity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 11 (2002) 285-298
9. De Dreu C.K.W., and Van Vianen A.E.M. Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior 22 (2001) 309-328
10. De Dreu C.K.W., and Weingart L.R. Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (2003) 741-749
11. Edmondson A.C., Bohmer R.M., and Pisano G.P. Disrupted routines: team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly 46 (2001) 685-715
12. Elfering A., Semmer N.K., Schade V., Grund S., and Boos N. Supportive colleague, unsupportive supervisor: the role of provider-specific constellations of social support at work in the development of low back pain. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 7 (2002) 130-140
13. Ericsson K.A., and Lehmann A.C. Expert and exceptional performance: evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology 47 (1996) 273-305
14. Fussell S.R., Kraut R.E., Lerch F.J., Scherlis W.L., McNally M.M., and Cadiz J.J. Coordination, overload and team performance: Effects of team communication strategies (1998), Paper presented at the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, New York
15. Gersick C.J.G., and Hackman J.R. Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 47 (1990) 65-97
16. Gevers J.M.P., VanEerde W., and Rutte C.G. Time pressure, potency, and progress in project groups. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 10 (2001) 205-221
17. Gladstein D.L. Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly 29 (1984) 499-517
18. Gurtner A. Zweimal musst du es schon sagen: Strategieentwicklung und kommunikationsmuster in hierarchisch organisierten Teams (saying at least twice: Strategy development and leader communication patterns) (2003), Universität Bern
19. Gurtner, A., Tschan, F., Semmer, N.K., Nägele, C. (à paraître). Getting groups to develop good strategies: Effects of reflexivity interventions on team process, team performance, and mental models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
20. Hackman J.R. The design of work teams. In: Losch W. (Ed). Handbook of organizational behavior (1987), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
21. Hackman J.R. Leading teams. Setting the stage for great performances (2002), Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachussetts
22. Hackman R.J., Brousseau K.R., and Weiss J.A. The interaction of task design and group performance strategies in determining group effectiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16 (1976) 350-365
23. James L.R., Demaree R.G., and Wolf G. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology 69 (1984) 85-98
24. Kaiser H. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39 (1974) 31-36
25. Levine J.M., Resnick L.B., and Higgins E.T. Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 44 (1993) 585-612
26. Locke E.A., and Lathman G.P. Building a practical useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: a 35 years odyssey. American Psychologist 54 (2002) 705-717
27. McGrath J.E. Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): a theory of groups. Small Group Research 22 (1991) 147-174
28. McGrath J.A., and Argote L. Group processes in organizational contexts. In: Hogg M.A., and Tindale R.S. (Eds). Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (2001), Blackwell Publishers, Oxford 603-627
29. Orasanu J.M. Shared problem models and flight crew performance. In: Johnston N., McDonald N., and Fuller R. (Eds). Aviation Psychology in Practice (1994), Avebury Technical, Hants 255-285
30. Organ D.W. Organizational citizenship behavior: It's construct clean-up time. Human Performance 10 (1997) 85-97
31. Raikes, J., (2005). The increasing need for real-time collaboration. Retrieved 27 décembre, 2005, from the World Wide Web: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/assistance/HA011927661033.aspx.
32. Roe R.A., Dienes E., TenHorn L., and Zinovieva I. Expanded delft measurement kit: English version (1995), WORC, Tillburg
33. Salas E., Sims D.E., and Burke C.S. Is there a "big five" in teamwork?. Small Group Research 36 (2005) 555-599
34. Schippers M.C., DenHartog D.N., Koopman P.L., and Wienk J.A. Diversity and team outcomes: the moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of reflexivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior 24 (2003) 779-802
35. Schön D.A. Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions (1987), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
36. Stasser G., and Titus W. Effects of information load and percentage shared information in the dissemination on unshared information during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53 (1987) 81-93
37. Steiner I.D. Group process and productivity (1972), Academic Press, New York
38. Swift T.A., and West M.A. Reflexivity and group processes: Research and practice (1998), University of Sheffield, Sheffield
39. Tjosvold D., Hui C., and Yu Z. Conflict management and task reflexivity for team in-role and extra-role performance in China. The International Journal of Conflict Management 14 (2003) 141-163
40. Tjosvold D., Tang M.M.L., and West M.A. Reflexivity for team innovation in China. Group and Organization Management 29 (2004) 540-559
41. Tschan F., and Semmer N.K. Savoir plus que ce que l'on puisse enseigner : limites d'accès par la réflexion à des processus de groupe, et les conséquences pour l'enseignement des groupes. In: savoie A. (Ed). Leadership et pouvoir; groupes et groupes (1999), Presses Inter-Universitaires, Cap-Rouge (CA) 159-172
42. Tschan F., Semmer N.K., Nägele C., and Gurtner A. Task adaptative behavior and performance in groups. Group processes and intergroup relations 3 (2000) 367-386
43. Tschan F., and VonCranach M. Group task structure, processes and outcome. In: West M.A. (Ed). Handbook of work group psychology (1996), John Wiley & sons Ltd, Chichester 95-121
44. Waterson P.E., Clegg C.W., Bolden R., Pepper K., Warr P.B., and Wall T.D. The use and effectiveness of modern manufacturing practices: A survey of UK industry. International Journal of Production Research 37 10 (1999) 2271-2292
45. Weingart L.R. Impact of groups goals, task component complexity, effort, and planning on group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 77 (1992) 682-693
46. West M.A. Reflexivity and work group effectiveness: a conceptual integration. In: West M.A. (Ed). Handbook of work group psychology (1996), John Wiley & sons Ltd, Chichester 555-579
47. West M.A. Reflexivity, revolution, and innovation in work teams. In: Beyerlein M.M., Johnson D.A., and Beyerlein S.T. (Eds). Product development teams (2000), JAI Press Inc 1-29 (Vol. 5)
48. West M.A., and Markiewicz L. Building team-based working. A practical guide to organizational transformation (2004), British Psychological Society and Blackwell Publishing Ltd