Patients who challenge

Best Practice and Research: Clinical Anaesthesiology

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 545-563

  Ward, Michael ^a   Savulescu, Julian ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

autonomy; best interests; ethics; paternalism; patient choice; patient values; refusal of treatment

Indexed keywords

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT; ARGATROBAN; CLEOFOL; GELATIN SUCCINATE; HAEMACELL; HEPARIN; HETASTARCH; HYALURONIC ACID; INSULIN; LOW MOLECULAR WEIGHT HEPARIN; POLYGELINE; POLYMERIZED HEMOGLOBIN; PROPOFOL;

ABDOMINAL BLEEDING; ALCOHOLISM; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DELIVERY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; DRUG DEPENDENCE; EMERGENCY SURGERY; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; HEALTH CARE COST; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INFORMED CONSENT; JEHOVAH'S WITNESS; JEW; JUSTICE; LAPAROTOMY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MORBID OBESITY; MOSLEM; NEUROSURGERY; NUTRITIONAL SUPPORT; OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA; PATERNALISM; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT RIGHT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; REHYDRATION; RELIGION; RESUSCITATION; REVIEW; SMOKING; SUICIDAL BEHAVIOR; TREATMENT REFUSAL; VEGETARIAN; WELLBEING;

ANESTHESIOLOGY; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; ENGLAND; ETHICS, MEDICAL; FAMILY; HUMANS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PHYSICIAN'S ROLE; RELIGION AND MEDICINE; TREATMENT REFUSAL; UNNECESSARY PROCEDURES; WALES;

EID: 33751402366     PISSN: 15216896     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2006.09.003     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Scott W. How 'veggie' are you? The Friend. The Independent Quaker Weekly (21st October 2005) London
2. Dyer C. Surgeon amputated healthy legs. British Medical Journal 320 7231 (2000) 332
3. R (Burke) v General Medical Council (Official Solicitor and others intervening): [2005] EWCA Civ 1003, at para 2.
4. R(Burke) v The General Medical Council [2004] E.W.H.C. 1879, para 3.
5. R(Burke) v The General Medical Council [2004] E.W.H.C. 1879, para 1.
6. R(Burke) v The General Medical Council [2004] E.W.H.C. 1879, para 213 (n).
7. Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights impose an obligation not to subject a person to inhuman or degrading treatment; Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights impose an obligation not to interfere with a person's physical and psychological integrity - R(Burke) v The General Medical Council [2004] E.W.H.C. 1879, para 119.
8. Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights impose an obligation not to subject a person to inhuman or degrading treatment; Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights impose an obligation not to interfere with a person's physical and psychological integrity - R(Burke) v The General Medical Council [2004] E.W.H.C. 1879, para 213.
9. Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights impose an obligation not to subject a person to inhuman or degrading treatment; Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights impose an obligation not to interfere with a person's physical and psychological integrity - R(Burke) v The General Medical Council [2004] E.W.H.C. 1879, para 23.
10. Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights impose an obligation not to subject a person to inhuman or degrading treatment; Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights impose an obligation not to interfere with a person's physical and psychological integrity - R(Burke) v The General Medical Council [2004] E.W.H.C. 1879, paras, 23, 81.
11. Beauchamp T.L., and Childress J.F. Principles of biomedical ethics. 3rd ed. (1989), Oxford University Press, New York pp. 1-470
12. Dworkin G. The theory and practice of autonomy (1988), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge p. 12
13. Savulescu J., and Momeyer R.J. Should informed consent be based on rational beliefs?. Journal of Medical Ethics 23 5 (1997) 282-288
14. Harris J. The value of life (1985), Routledge & Keegan Paul, New York p. 201
15. Savulescu J. Rational non-interventional paternalism: why doctors ought to make judgments of what is best for their patients. Journal of Medical Ethics 21 6 (1995) 327-331
16. Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority, in AC. [1986], House of Lords. p. 112.
17. Secretary, Department of Health and Community Services v JWB and SMB (Marion's case), in CLR. 1992, High Court of Australia. p. 218.
18. Re R (A Minor) (Wardship: Consent to Treatment), in Fam. [1991], Court of Appeal (Civil Division). p. 11.
19. Re W (A Minor) (Medical Treatment: Court's Jurisdiction), in Fam. [1993], Court of Appeal (Civil Division). p. 64.
20. Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children trading as Children's Hospital at Westmead v J & Ors, in NSWSC. [2005]. p. 465.
21. McLean K. Children and competence to consent: Gillick guiding medical treatment in New Zealand. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 2000 (2000) 31
22. Wikler D. Persuasion and coercion for health: ethical issues in government efforts to change life-styles. Health and Society 56 3 (1978) 303-333
23. Veatch R.M. Voluntary risks to health: the ethical issues. The Journal of the American Medical Association 243 1 (1980) 50-55
24. R v North West Lancashire HA Ex p A, in WLR. 2000, p. 977.
25. Mill J.S. Principles of Political Economy (1900), P.F. Collier and Sons, New York pp. 150-151
26. Re S (Adult: Refusal of Treatment), in Fam. [1993]. p. 123.
27. Re MB (Caesarean Section), in Med LR. [1997], Court of Appeal (Civil Division). p. 217.
28. St George's Healthcare NHS Trust v S, in WLR. [1998], Court of Appeal. p. 936.
29. Cahill H. An Orwellian scenario: court ordered caesarean section and women's autonomy. Nursing ethics 6 6 (1999) 494-505
30. Crafter H. Forcible caesarean: a new direction in British maternity care? Thoughts on the case of Mrs S. Nursing ethics 1 1 (1994) 53-55
31. Draper H. Women, forced caesareans and antenatal responsibilities. Journal of Medical Ethics 22 6 (1996) 327-333
32. Krishna G.M. Vegetarian anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 58 (2003) 501
33. Management of Anaesthesia for Jehovah's Witnesses. 2nd ed. (2005), Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. http://www.aagbi.org/pdf/Jehovah.pdf
34. The King James Authorised Bible: Genesis 9:3-4 Leviticus 17:11-12 Acts 15:28-29.
35. ReT in All England Law Reports 1992; 4:647-70.
36. Management of Anaesthesia for Jehovah's Witnesses (1999), Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland
37. Office for National Statistics. Census 2001 (2004), Office for National Statistics, London
38. Eipe N. Colloids for vegetarians, letter. Anaesthesia 60 (2005) 520
39. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinduism
40. Personal communication with Ramesh Kallidai, Sec General Hindu Forum of Britain, 2006.
41. Natubhai Shah, Personal Communication 2006.
42. Navarange S., Rathinam S., Makker R., and Butler A. Anaesthesia for vegetarians. Anaesthesia 60 (2005) 520-521
43. Sarkar S. Use of animal products in vegetarians and others. Anaesthesia 60 (2005) 519-520
44. Kartha V., Barker K., and Mackenzie I. Patient choice vs. finite resources. Anaesthesia 60 (2005) 1149
45. Personal Communication Sir Peter Williams 2006.
46. (2005). www.mayoclinic.com/health/drug-addiction/DS00183
47. Alcoholics Anonymous (Great Britain) Ltd 2005.
48. Kamps BS & Hoffmann C. SARS Reference - 10/2003, SARSReference.com