Levels of inbreeding depression over seven generations of selfing in the androdioecious clam shrimp, Eulimnadia texana

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 475-484

  Weeks, S C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

Author keywords

Androdioecy; Branchiopod crustaceans; Evolution of mating systems; Genetic load; Partial dominance model

Indexed keywords

ANDRODIOECY; CRUSTACEAN; EVOLUTION; INBREEDING DEPRESSION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRUSTACEA; GENDER AND SEX; GENETICS; HERMAPHRODITISM; INBREEDING; MALE; PEDIGREE; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION GENETICS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CRUSTACEA; GENETICS, POPULATION; HERMAPHRODITISM; INBREEDING; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PEDIGREE; SEX DETERMINATION (GENETICS); SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

ANIMALIA; BIVALVIA; BRANCHIOPODA; CONCHOSTRACA; CRUSTACEA; DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA); EULIMNADIA; EULIMNADIA TEXANA; INVERTEBRATA; LIMNADIIDAE;

EID: 2342586611     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00712.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Barrett, S.C.H. & Charlesworth, D. 1991. Effects of a change in the level of inbreeding on the genetic load. Nature 352: 522-524.
2. Bull, J.J. 1983. Evolution of Sex Determining Mechanisms. The Benjamin/Cummings Publ. Co., Inc., Menlo Park, CA.
3. Byers, D.L. & Waller, D.M. 1999. Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30: 479-513.
4. Carr, D.E. & Dudash, M.R. 1997. The effects of five generations of enforced selfing on potential male and female function in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 51: 1797-1807.
5. Charlesworth, D. 1984. Androdioecy and the evolution of dioecy. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 22: 333-348.
6. Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 237-268.
7. Dudash, M.R., Carr, D.E. & Fenster, C.B. 1997. Five generations of enforced selfing and outcrossing in Mimulus guttatus: inbreeding depression variation at the population and family level. Evolution 51: 54-65.
8. Husband, B.C. & Schemske, D.W. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50: 54-70.
9. Keller, L.F. & Waller, D.M. 2002. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 230-241.
10. Knoll, L. 1995. Mating-behavior and time budget of an androdioecious crustacean, Eulimnadia texana (Crustacea, Conchostraca). Hydrobiologia 298: 73-81.
11. Lande, R., Schemske, D.W. & Schultz, S.T. 1994. High inbreeding depression, selective interference among loci, and the threshold selfing rate for purging recessive lethal mutations. Evolution 48: 965-978.
12. Lloyd, D.G. 1975. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in angiosperms. Genetica 45: 325-339.
13. MacKay, W.P., Frost, T.P. & Whitford, W.G. 1990. Population dynamics of a playa community in the Chihuahuan desert. Southwestern Nat. 35: 393-402.
14. Medland, V.L. 1989. Influence of Terrestrial Vegetation on the Production and Community Structure of a Desert Playa. Master's thesis. New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM USA.
15. Ohta, T. 1971. Associative overdominance caused by linked detrimental mutations. Genet. Res. 18: 277-286.
16. Otto, S.P., Sassaman, C. & Feldman, M.W. 1993. Evolution of sex determination in the conchostracan shrimp Eulimnadia texana. Am. Nat. 141: 329-337.
17. Pannell, J. 1997. The maintenance of gynodloecy and androdioecy in a metapopulation. Evolution 51: 10-20.
18. Pannell, J.R. 2002. The evolution and maintenance of androdioecy. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33: 397-425.
19. Pray, L.A. & Goodnight, C.J. 1995. Genetic-variation in inbreeding depression in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Evolution 49: 176-188.
20. Richardson, B.J., Baverstock, P.R. & Adams, M. 1986. Allozyme Electrophoresis. A Handbook for Animal Systematics and Population Studies. Academic Press, New York.
21. Roff, D.A. 2002. Inbreeding depression: tests of the over-dominance and partial dominance hypotheses. Evolution 56: 768-775.
22. Saccheri, I.J., Brakefield, P.M. & Nichols, R.A. 1996. Severe inbreeding depression and rapid fitness rebound in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana (Satyridae). Evolution 50: 2000-2013.
23. SAS Institute. 2003. JMP Statistical Software. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
24. Sassaman, C. 1989. Inbreeding and sex-ratio variation in female-biased populations of a clam shrimp, Eulimnadia texana. Bull. Mar. Sci. 45: 425-432.
25. Sassaman, C. & Weeks, S.C. 1993. The genetic mechanism of sex determination in the conchostracan shrimp Eulimnadia texana. Am. Nat. 141: 314-328.
26. Wang, J.L. 2000. Effects of population structures and selection strategies on the purging of inbreeding depression due to deleterious mutations. Genet. Res. 76: 75-66.
27. Weeks, S.C. & Zucker, N. 1999. Rates of inbreeding in the androdioecious clam shrimp Eulimnadia texana. Can. J. Zool. 77: 1402-1408.
28. Weeks, S.C., Marcus, V. & Alvarez, S. 1997. Notes on the life history of the clam shrimp, Eulimnadia texana. Hydrobiologia 359: 191-197.
29. Weeks, S.C., Marcus, V. & Crosser, B.R. 1999. Inbreeding depression in a self-compatible, androdioecious crustacean, Eulimnadia texana. Evolution 53: 472-483.
30. Weeks, S.C., Crosser, B.R., Bennett, R., Gray, M. & Zucker, N. 2000. Maintenance of androdioecy in the freshwater shrimp, Eulimnadia texana: estimates of inbreeding depression in two populations. Evolution 54: 878-887.
31. Weeks, S.C., Crosser, B.R. & Gray, M.M. 2001a. Relative fitness of two hermaphroditic mating types in the androdioecious clam shrimp, Eulimnadia texana. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 83-94.
32. Weeks, S.C., Hutchison, J.A. & Zucker, N. 2001b. Maintenance of androdioecy in the freshwater shrimp, Eulimnadia texana: do hermaphrodites need males for complete fertilization? Evol. Ecol. 15: 205-221.
33. Whitlock, M.C., Ingvarsson, P.K. & Hatfield, T. 2000. Local drift load and the heterosis of interconnected populations. Heredity 84: 452-457.
34. Willis, J.H. 1999. The role of genes of large effect on inbreeding depression in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 53: 1678-1691.