Product platform problem taxonomy: Classification and identification of benchmark problems

Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Allada, Venkat ^a   Choudhury, Abhijit K ^a   Pakala, Padmavathi K ^a   Simpson, Timothy W ^b   Scott, Michael J ^c   Valliyappan, Somasundaram ^b  

^a MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

^c 1120 Science and Engineering Offices   (United States)

Author keywords

Benchmarking problems; Product platforms; Strategic and tactical decisions; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; CURRICULA; PROBLEM SOLVING;

BENCHMARKING PROBLEMS; PRODUCT PLATFORMS; STRATEGIC AND TACTICAL DECISIONS; TAXONOMY;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 33751343705     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/detc2006-99573     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (62)

1. Collier, D.A., 1981, "The measurement and operating benefits of component part commonality," Decision Sciences, 12(1), pp. 85-96.
2. D' Souza, B. and Simpson, T. W., 2003, "A Genetic Algorithm Based Method for Product Family Design Optimization," Engineering Optimization, 35 (1) pp.1-18.
3. Dahmus, J. B., Gonzalez-Zugasti,J.P. and Otto, K. N., 2001, "Modular Product Architecture," Design Studies, 22(5),pp. 409-424.
4. Dai, Z., and Scott, M.J., 2004, "Product platform design using sensitivity analysis and cluster analysis," ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference - Design Automation Conference, Chen, W. (Ed.), Salt Lake City, UT, ASME, Paper No. DETC2004/DAC-57464.
5. Desai, P. Kekre S., Radhakrishnan, and Srinivasan, K., 2001, "Product Differentiation and Commonality in Design: Balancing Revenue and Cost Drivers," Management Science, 20(1), pp. 37-51.
6. Dess, G. G., and Davis, P. S., 1984, "Porter's 1980 Generic strategies as determinants of strategic group membership and organizational performance," Academy of Management Journal, 27 (3), pp. 467-488.
7. Du, X., Jiao, J. and Tseng, M.M., 2001, "Architecture of product family: Fundamentals and Methodology," Concurrent Engineering: Research and Application, 9(4), pp. 309-325.
8. Ericsson, A and Erixon, G., 1999, Controlling Design Variables: Modular Product Platforms, ASME, New York.
9. Fellini, R., Kokkoloras, M. and Papalambros, P.Y., 2005, "Commonality Decisions in Product Family Design," Product Platform and Product Family Design (Edited by T. W. Simpson, Z. Siddique, and J. Jiao). Springer Verlag, NY, 10013, USA.
10. Fujita, K. and Yoshida, H., 2001, "Product Variety optimization: simultaneous optimization of module combination and module attributes," 2001 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Paper no. DETC2001/DAC-21058.
11. Fujita, K., Sakaguchi, H. and Akagi, S., 1999, "Product variety deployment and its optimization under modular architecture and module communalization," 1999 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Paper no. DETC1999/DFM-8923.
12. Gulati, R. K., and Eppinger, S. D., 1996, "The coupling of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure Decisions", MIT Working Paper, Working Paper - 3906.
13. Harvey, M.G. and Kerin, R.A., 1979, "Diagnosis and management of the product cannibalism syndrome," University of Michigan Business Review, 31(6), pp. 18-29.
14. Hernandez, G., Allen, J. K., Mistree, F., 2003, "Platform design for customizable products as a problem of access in a geometric space," J. of Eng. Optimization, 35(3), pp. 229-254.
15. Heskett, I, 1916, Marketing, Macmillan, New York, NY.
16. Hillier, M.S., 2000, "Component commonality in multiple-period: Assemble-to-order systems," IIE Transactions, 32, pp. 755-766.
17. Huang, G. Q., Simpson, T. W. and Pine, B. J., II, 2005, "The Power of Product Platforms in Mass Customisation," International Journal of Mass Customization, 1(1), pp. 1-13.
18. Jiao, J., and Tseng, M.M., 2000, "Understanding product family for mass customization by developing commonality indices," Journal of Engineering Design, 11(3) pp. 225-243.
19. Jose, A. and Tollenaere, M., 2005, "Modular and Platform methods for product family design: literature analysis," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 16(3), pp 371-390.
20. Kota, S., and Sethuraman, K., 1998, "Managing variety in product families through design for commonality," Proceedings of the 1998 ASME DETC, Atlanta, GA, DETC/DTM-5651.
21. Kota, S., Sethuraman, K., and Miller, R., 2000, "A metric for evaluating design commonality in product families," Journal of Mechanical Design, 122 (4), pp. 403-410.
22. Krishnan, V. and Gupta, S., 2001, "Appropriateness and Impact of Platform-Based Product Development," Management Science, 47(1), pp. 52-68.
23. Krishnan, V. and Ulrich, K.T., 2001, "Product Development Decisions: A review of the literature," Management Science, 47(1), pp. 1-21.
24. Kulkami, R. S., Allen, J. K., and Mistree, F., 2005, "Designing Product Families for a changing Market Space," ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Advances in /design Automation, and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Long Beach, California, September 24-28, DETC2005-85164.
25. Kumar, Allada, and Ramakrishnan, 2004, "Ant Colony Optimization Method for Product Platform Formation," ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Advances in /design Automation, and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, September 28-October 2, Paper no. DETC2000/DAC-14264.
26. Kumar, R., and Allada, V., 2005, "Customer need driven function-behavior platform formation," Proceedings of the 2005 DETC 31st Design Automation Conference, September 24-28, 2005, Long Beach, California, Proceedings of IDETC/CIE 2005.
27. Kurtadikar, R. M., Stone, R. B., Wie, M. V. and McAdams, D. A., 2004, "A customer needs motivated conceptual design methodology for product portfolios," ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, Paper no. DETC2004-57289.
28. Kusiak, A., 2002, "Integrated product and process design: a modularity perspective," Journal of Engineering Design, 13 (5), pp.220-231.
29. Lee, B., and Saitou, K., 2002, "Design of part family robust-to-production plan variations based on quantitative manufacturability evaluation," Research in Engineering Design, 13, pp. 199-212.
30. Lee, H. L., and Tang, C. S. 1997, "Modelling the costs and benefits of Delayed Product Differentiation," Management Science, 43(1), pp. 40-53.
31. Li, H. and Azarm, S, 2002, "An approach for product line design selection under uncertainty and competition," Journal of Mechanical Design, 124, pp. 385-392.
32. Lomax, W., 1996, "The measurement of cannibalization", Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 14(7), pp. 20-32.
33. Maier J. R.A, and Fadel G. M., 2001, "Strategic Decisions in the early stages of product family design," ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, September 9-12, Pittsburgh, PA, DETC2001/DFM-21200.
34. Martin, M. V., and Ishii, K, 1996, "Design for Variety: A methodology for understanding the costs of product proliferation," Proceedings of the 1996 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers in Engineering Conference, Irvine, California.
35. Messac, A., Martinez, M. P., and Simpson, T. W., 2002, "Effective product family design using physical programming," Eng. Opt., 34(3), pp. 245-261.
36. Messac, A., Martinez, M. P., Simpson, T. W., b, "Introduction of a product family penalty function using physical programming," Transactions of ASME, June 2002, 1(24), pp. 164-172.
37. Meyer, M.H. and Lehnerd, A.P., 1997, The Power of Product Platforms, building value and cost leadership, New York, The Free Press.
38. Muffatto, M., 1999, "Introducing a platform strategy in product development," International Journal of Production Economics, 60-61, pp. 145-153.
39. Nayak, R. U., Chen W., and Simpson, T. W., 2002, "A variation-based method for product family design," Engineering Optimization, 34(1), pp. 65-81.
40. Ortega, R. A., Kalyan-Seshu, U., and Bras, B., 1999, "A decision support model for the life-cycle design of a family of oil filters," ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Paper no. DETC/DAC-8612.
41. Park, J. and Simpson, T. W., 2005, "Development of a Production Cost Estimation Framework to Support Product Family Design," International Journal of Product Research, 43(4), pp. 731-772.
42. Pine, B.J., II, 1993, Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
43. Rai, R, and Allada, V., 2003, "Modular product families design: agent-based Pareto-optimization and quality loss function-based post-optimal analysis," International Journal Production Research, 41 (17), pp. 4075-4098.
44. Sanderson, S.W., and M.V.Uzmeri, 1996, Managing Product Families, Irwin Press.
45. Scott, M.J., Arenillas, J.C.G, Simpson, T.W., Valliyappan, S., Allada, V., 2006, "Towards a suite of problems for Comparison of Product Platform Design Methods: A Proposed Classification," Proceedings of DETC 2006 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Philadelphia, PA, USA, September 10-13, 2006, Paper No. DETC2006/DAC-99287.
46. Seepersad, C. C., Mistree, F. and Allen, J.K, 2002, "A Quantative Approach for Designing multiple platforms for an evolving portfolio of products," ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Advances in Design Automation, Montreal, Canada, DETC2002/DAC-34096.
47. Shil, P., and Allada, V., 2005, "Evaluating new product platform development projects: A Game theoretic real option approach," Industrial Engineering Research Conference, Atlanta, GA.
48. Siddique, Z., 2005, "Assembly process selection to minimize existing assembly system modification cost during new product family member design," Proceedings of International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conferences, Long beach, California, Paper no. DETC2005-85016.
49. Siddique, Z., and Natrajan, M., "Measuring shape commonality," Product Platform and Product Family Design. (Edited by T. W. Simpson, Z. Siddique, and J. Jiao) Springer Verlag, NY, 10013, USA, pp. 403-420.
50. Siddique, Z, Rosen, D.W., and Wang, M, 1998, "On the applicability of product variety design and concepts to automotive platform commonality," ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences - Design Theory and Methodology, Atlanta, GA, ASME, Paper No. DETC98/DTM-5661.
51. Simpson, T. W., 2004, "Product Platform Design and Customization: Status and Promise," Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 18(1), pp. 3-20.
52. th AIAA/ISSMO symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, Paper no. 5427.
53. Simpson, T. W., Maier J. R. A., Mistree, F., 2001, "Product platform design: method and application," Research in Engineering Design, 13 (1), pp. 2-22.
54. Slevinsky, M. A., and Gu, P., 2005, "Modular platform design using mechanical bus architectures," International Journal of Mass Customization, 1(1), pp 65-82.
55. Sosa, M. E., Eppinger, S. D., Rowles, C. M., 2003, "Identifying modular and integrative systems and their impact on design team interactions," Transactions of ASME, 125 pp. 25-39.
56. Tenneti B., and Allada, V., 2005, "Robust Supplier Selection for Changing Product Architectures," Proceedings of IMECE 2005, 2005 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress And Exposition, November 5-11, 2005, Orlando, Florida USA, Paper No. IMECE2005-81179.
57. Thevenot, H. J., and Simpson, T. W., 2005, "Commonality Indices for assessing Product Families," Product platform and Product Family Design, Methods and Applications, 2005, pp. 106-129.
58. nd edition, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
59. Wacker, J.G., and Trelevan, M., 1986, "Component part standardization: An analysis of commonality sources and indices," Journal of Operations Management, 6(2), pp. 219-244.
60. Weck de, O. L., Suh, E. S., Chang, D., 2003, "Product family and Platform Portfolio Optimization," ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, September 2-6, Chicago, IL, Paper no. DETC2003/DAC-48721.
61. Wie, M. J. V., Greer, J. L., Campbell, M. I., Stone, R. B., Wood, K. L., 2001, "Interfaces and product architecture," Proceedings of DETC2001, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Paper no. DETC2001/DTM-21689.
62. Wilson, L. O., and Norton, J. A., 1989, "Optimal entry timing for a product line extension," Marketing Science, 8(1), pp. 89-112.