Customer need driven function-behavior platform formation

Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference - DETC2005

Volumn 2 B, Issue , 2005, Pages 1069-1078

  Kumar, Rupesh ^a   Allada, Venkat ^b  

^a MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b University of Missouri Rolla   (United States)

Author keywords

Ant Colony Optimization; FBS Structure; Functional Modeling; Product Family; Product Platform Formation

Indexed keywords

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; MAPPING; OPTIMIZATION;

ANT COLONY OPTIMIZATION; FBS STRUCTURE; FUNCTION-BEHAVIOR ANT COLONY OPTIMIZATION; FUNCTIONAL MODELING; PHYSICAL STRUCTURE LEVEL; PRODUCT FAMILY; PRODUCT PLATFORM FORMATION;

FUNCTIONS;

EID: 33144470190     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/detc2005-85336     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. CAMPBELL, M. I., LIMAYE, A., 2002, New advances in the functional modeling of electro-mechanical components. Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Montreal, Canada, DETC02/DTM-34007.
2. DAI, Z., and SCOTT, M. J., 2004, Effective Product Family Design Using Preference Aggregation, ASME DETC Conference and CIEC, September 28-October 2, DETC2004-57419.
3. DORIGO, M., and STUTZLE, T., 2004, Ant Colony Optimization, MIT Press, London, England.
4. DORIGO, M., MANIEZZO, V., and COLORNI, A., 1996, The Ant Systems: Optimization by a Colony of Cooperative Agents. IEEE Transactions on Man, Machine and Cybernetics- Part B, 26(1), pp. 29-41.
5. GERO, J.S. and KANNENGIESSER, U., 2003, Function-Behavior-Structure: A Model for Social Situated Agents. Workshop on Cognitive Modeling of Agents and Multi-Agent Interactions, International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2003, Acapulco, Mexico, pp. 101-107.
6. HIRTZ J., STONE, R.B., McADAMS D. A., SZYKMAN, S., and WOOD, K. L., 2001, Evolving a functional basis for engineering design. Proceedings of DETC2001, DETC2001/DTM-21688, Pittsburgh, PA
7. HUBKA, V., and EDER, W.E., 2001, Functions revisited. International Conference on Engineering Design.
8. KURFMAN, M. A., STONE, R. B., RAJAN, J. R., and WOOD, K. L., 2001, Functional modeling experimental studies. Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, DETC2001/DTM-21709.
9. KUMAR, R., ALLADA, V., and RAMAKRISHNAN, S., 2004, Ant Colony Optimization Method for Product Platform Formation, ASME DETC Conference and CIEC, September 28October 2, DETC2004 - 57195.
10. KUMAR, R., TIWARI, M. K., and SHANKAR, R., 2003, Scheduling of Flexible Manufacturing Systems: An Ant Colony Optimization Approach, Journal of Engineering Manufacturing Part B, 217(10), 1443-1453.
11. KURTADHIKAR, R. M., WIE, M. V., MCADAMS, D. A., AND STONE, R. B., 2004, A Customer Needs Motivated Conceptual Design Methodology for Product Portfolios, ASME DETC Conference and CIEC, September 28-October 2, DETC2004-57289.
12. McADAMS, D.A., STONE, R. B., and WOOD, K. L., 1997, Functional interdependence and product similarity based on customer needs, Research in Engineering Design, 11(1), 1-19.
13. McADAMS D. A., and WOOD, K., 2000, Quantitative measures for design by analogy. Proceedings of ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, DETC2000/DTM-14562.
14. OTTO, K. N., and WOOD, K. L., 1998, Product evolution: A reverse engineering and redesign methodology. Research in Engineering Design, 10 (4), 226-243.
15. nd edition.
16. QIAN, L., and GERO, J.S., 1996, Function-Behavior-Structure Paths and their role in analogy-based design, AIEDAM 10: 289-312.
17. SIMPSON, T. W., 2004, Product platform design and customization: status and promise. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 18(1), 1-39.
18. STONE, R., WOOD, K., and CRAWFORD, R., 1998, A heuristic method to identify modules from a functional description of a product. Proceedings of DETC98, DETC98/DTM-5642, Atlanta, GA.
19. STONE, R., WOOD, K., and CRAWFORD, R., 1999, Product architecture development with quantitative functional models. Proceedings of DETC99, DETC99/DTM-8764, Las Vegas, NV.
20. STONE, R., WOOD, K., and CRAWFORD, R., 2000, Using quantitative functional models to develop product architectures. Design Studies 21(3), 239-260.
21. STONE, R., and WOOD, K., 2000, Development of a functional basis for design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 122(4), 359-370.
22. STRAWBRIDGE, Z., McADAMS, D. A., and STONE, R.B., 2002, A computational approach to conceptual design. Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Montreal, Canada, DETC2002/DTM-34001, pp. 1-11.
23. WILLIAMS, C. B., ALLEN, J. K., ROSEN, D. W. and MISTREE F., 2004, Designing Platforms for Customizable Products in Markets with Non-Uniform Demand, ASME DETC Conference and CIEC, September 28-October 2, DETC2004-57469.
24. YANNOU, B., and PETIOT, J. F., 2004, A Methodology for Integrating Customers' Assessments During the Conceptual Design, ASME DETC Conference and CIEC, September 28October 2, DETC2004-57226.