Can random mutation mimic design?: A guided inquiry laboratory for undergraduate students

Genetics

Volumn 174, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 1073-1079

  Kalinowski, Steven T ^a   Taper, Mark L ^a   Metz, Anneke M ^a  

^a MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOENGINEERING; CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INHERITANCE; LABORATORY TEST; MEDICAL STUDENT; NATURAL SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTION; REVIEW;

BIOLOGY; GENETICS; HUMANS; LABORATORIES; LABORATORY TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES; MUTATION; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; RESEARCH; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

EID: 33751308396     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 00166731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.061234     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. ALTERS, J. B., and C. E. NELSON, 2002 Perspective: teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution 56: 1891-1901.
2. BEHE, M., 1996 Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. The Free Press, New York.
3. BISHOP, B., and C. ANDERSON, 1990 Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 27: 415-427.
4. BONNER, J. J., 2005 Which scientific method should we teach & when? Am. Biol. Teach. 67: 262-264.
5. BRUMBY, M., 1984 Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students. Sci. Ed. 68: 493-503.
6. CAMPBELL, N. A., and J. B. REECE, 2005 Biology, Ed. 7. Pearson Education, San Francisco.
7. DARWIN, C. R., 1859 On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. John Murray, London.
8. DAWKINS, R., 1996 Climbing Mount Improbable. W. W. Norton, New York.
9. FERNALD, R. D., 2004 Eyes: variety, development and evolution. Brain Behav. Evol. 64: 141-147.
10. HARWOOD, W. S., 2004 A new model for inquiry. Is the scientific method dead? J. College Sci. Teach. 23: 29-33.
11. KALINOWSKI, S. T., M. L. TAPER and A. M. METZ, 2005 How are humans related to other primates?: A guided inquiry laboratory for undergraduate students. Genetics 172: 1379-1383.
12. LAWSON, A. E., 1995 Science Teaching and the Development of Thinking. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
13. LAWSON, A. E., 1999 A scientific approach to teaching about evolution & special creation. Am. Biol. Teacher 61: 266-274.
14. LAWSON, A. E., 2003 Biology. An Inquiry Approach Laboratory Manual. Kendall/Hunt Publishing, Dubuque, IA.
15. NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL, 1996 National Science Education Standards. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
16. NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL, 1998 Teaching About Evolution and the Nature of Science. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
17. NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL, 2000 Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
18. NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL, 2003 Bio 2010: Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
19. NILSSON, D. E., and S. PELGER, 1994 A pessimistic estimate of the time required for an eye to evolve. Proc. R. Soc.Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 256: 53-58.
20. OAKLEY, T. H., and C. W. CUNNINGHAM, 2002 Molecular phylogenetic evidence for the independent evolutionary origin of an arthropod compound eye. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 1426-1430.
21. PALEY, W., 1802 Natural Theology. Gould, Kendall, & Lincoln, Boston.
22. PLATT, J. R., 1964 Strong inference. Science 146: 347-353.
23. RAY, J., 1691 The Wisdom of God Manifested in the Works of the Creation (referenced at http://www.jri.org.uk).
24. ROBINSON, W. R., 2005 The inquiry wheel, an alternative to the scientific method. Chem. Ed. Today 81: 791-792.
25. SCOTT, E., 2004 Evolution vs. Creationism. An Introduction. Greenwood Press, Westport, CT.
26. WESTERLING, K., 1992 Origami birds . . . the selection and variation in the Egyptian origami bird (Avis papyrus) (http://www.indiana.edu/~ensiweb/ lessons/origami.html).