Entanglement engineering of one-photon wave packets using a single-atom source

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 1998, Pages R2627-R2630

  Gheri, K M ^a   Saavedra, C ^a,b   Torma P ^a   Cirac, J I ^a,c   Zoller, P ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONCEPCIÓN   (Chile)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751266324     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.58.R2627     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. D. P. DiVincenzo, Science 270, 255 (1995).
2. C. H. Bennett, Phys. Today 48 (10), 24 (1995), and references cited;
3. A. K. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991).
4. J. I. Cirac et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3221 (1997);
5. Phys. Rev. Lett.T. Pellizzari, 79, 5242 (1997).
6. D. Bouwmeester et al, Nature (London) 390, 575 (1997).
7. D. Boschi et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1121 (1998).
8. E. Hagley et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1 (1997);
9. J. A. Bergou and M. Hillary, Phys. Rev. A 55, 4585 (1997).
10. A. Zeilinger et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3031 (1997).
11. C. K. Law and H. J. Kimble, J. Mod. Opt. 44, 2067 (1997).
12. S. N. Molotkov and S. S. Nazin, JETP Lett. 63, 687 (1996);
13. A. Imamoğlu and Y. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 210 (1994);
14. Phys. Rev. Lett.F. De Martini et al, 76, 900 (1996).
15. Q. A. Turchette et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4710 (1995).
16. G. M. Meyer, H.-J. Briegel, and H. Walther, Europhys. Lett. 35, 317 (1997).
17. C. H. Bennett et al, Sci. Am. (Int. Ed.) 267(4), 50 (1992);
18. W. Tittel et al, Phys. Rev. A 57, 3229 (1998).
19. C. H. Bennett et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993).
20. D. M. Greenberger et al, Am. J. Phys. 58, 1131 (1990);
21. D. A. Rice et al, Phys. Lett. A 186, 21 (1994).
22. S. N. Molotkov and S. S. Nazin, JETP Lett. 62, 956 (1995).
23. C. W. Gardiner, Quantum Noise (Springer, Berlin, 1991).
24. T. Pellizzari et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3788 (1995);
25. Phys. Rev. Lett.H. Mabuchi and P. Zoller, 76, 3108 (1996).
26. Here the size of the atomic wave packet (Formula presented) is smaller than the optical wavelength (Formula presented) and the population left behind in the wrong level is (Formula presented) which puts a limit on the number of photon pulses (Formula presented)
27. Assuming Gaussian-distributed error (Formula presented) a simple analytical estimate yields the exponential decay in Fig. 22.