Fairness is not validity or cultural bias in racial-group assessment: A quantitative perspective

American Psychologist

Volumn 61, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 845-859

  Helms, Janet E ^a  

^a BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Fair assessment; Racial identity; Test bias; Test fairness; Test score validity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ETHNIC GROUP; HUMAN; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARD; STATISTICS;

ATTITUDE; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CULTURE; ETHNIC GROUPS; HUMANS; PREJUDICE; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; SOCIAL JUSTICE;

EID: 33751253096     PISSN: 0003066X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.8.845     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Aiken, L. (2003). Psychological testing and assessment (11th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
2. Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
3. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
4. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
5. American Psychological Association. (2003). Guidelines on multicultural education, training, research, practice, and organizational change for psychologists. American Psychologist, 58, 377-402.
6. Beutler, L. E., Brown, M. T., Crothers, L., Booker, K., & Seabrook, M. K. (1996). The dilemma of fictitious demographic distinctions in psychological research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 892-902.
7. Bradby, D. (1992). Racial identity attitudes of Black students and academic persistence at a predominantly White university. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53(5-A), p. 1412.
8. Brown, R. T., Reynolds, C. R., & Whitaker, J. S. (1999), Bias in mental testing since Bias in Mental Testing, School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 208-238.
9. DeShon, R. P., Smith, M., Chan, D., & Schmitt, N. (1998). Can adverse impact on cognitive ability and personality tests be reduced by presenting problems in a social context? Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 438-451.
10. Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barren, K. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 115-134.
11. Frisby, C. L. (1993). One giant step backward: Myths of Black cultural learning styles. School Psychology Review, 22, 535-557.
12. Frisby, C. L. (1995). When facts and orthodoxy collide: The Bell Curve and the robustness criterion. School Psychology Review, 24, 12-19.
13. Frisby, C. L. (1999a). Culture and test session behavior: Part 1. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 263-280.
14. Frisby, C. L. (1999b). Culture and test session behavior: Part II. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 281-303.
15. Frisby, C. L. (1999c). Special issue: Straight, talk about, cognitive assessment and diversity. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 195-207.
16. Helms, J. E. (1992). Why is there no study of cultural equivalence in standardized cognitive ability testing? American Psychologist, 47, 1083-1101.
17. Helms, J. E. (1997). The triple quandary of race, culture and social class in intelligence testing. In D. Flanaghan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Beyond traditional intellectual assessment: Contemporary and emerging theories, tests, and issues (pp. 517-532). New York: Guilford Press.
18. Helms, J. E. (2002). A remedy for the Black-White testscore disparity. American Psychologist, 57, 303-305.
19. Helms, J. E. (2003). Racial identity and racial socialization as aspects of adolescents' identity development. In R. Lerner, F. Jacobs, & D. Wertlief (Eds.), Handbook of applied developmental science: Promoting positive child, adolescent, and family development through research, policies, and programs (Vol. 1, pp. 143-163). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Helms, J. E. (2004a). Fair and valid use of educational testing in grades K-12. In J. E. Wall & G. R. Walz (Eds.), Measuring up: Assessment issues for teachers, counselors, and administrators (pp. 81-88). Greensboro, NC: CAPS Press.
21. Helms, J. E. (2004b). The 2003 Leona Tyler award address: Making race a matter of individual differences within groups. The Counseling Psychologist, 32, 473-483.
22. Helms, J. E. (2005). Stereotype threat might explain the Black-White test-score difference. American Psychologist, 60, 269-270.
23. Helms, J. E., & Carter, R. T. (1991). Relationships of White and Black racial identity attitudes and demographic similarity to counselor preferences. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 446-457.
24. Helms, J. E., Henze, K. T., Mascher, J., & Satiani, A. (2005). Ethical issues when White researchers study ALANA and immigrant people and communities. In J. E. Trimble & C. B. Fisher (Eds.), The handbook of ethical research with ethnocultural populations and communities (pp. 299-324). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Helms, J. E., Jernigan, M., & Mascher, J. (2005). The meaning of race in psychology and how to change it: A methodological perspective. American Psychologist, 60, 27-36.
26. Heppner, P. P., Kivlighan, D. M., Jr., & Wampold, B. E. (1999). Research design in counseling (2nd ed.). Wadsworth: Brooks/Cole.
27. Heubert, J. P., & Hauser, R. M. (Eds.). (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation (Report of the Committee on Appropriate Test Use, Board on Testing and Assessment, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences Education, National Research Council). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
28. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1976). Critical analysis of the statistical and ethical implications of various definitions of test bias. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 1053-1071.
29. Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, R. F. (1979). Differential validity of employment tests by race: A comprehensive review and analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 721-735.
30. Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.
31. Jensen, A. R. (1998), The g factor. Westport, CT: Praeger.
32. Joint Committee on Testing Practices. (2004). Code of fair testing practices in education. Washington. DC: Joint Committee on Testing Practices. Retrieved October 10, 2005, from http://www.apa.org/science/FinalCode.pdf
33. Jones, J. M. (1972). Prejudice and racism. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
34. Knowles, E. D., & Peng, K. (2005). White selves: Conceptualizing and measuring a dominant-group identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 223-241.
35. Kush, J. C., Watkins, M. W., Ward, S. B., Canivez, G. L. & Worrell, F. C. (2001). Construct validity of the WISC-III for White and Black students from the WISC-III standardization sample and for Black students referred for psychological evaluation. School Psychology Review, 30, 70-94.
36. McFarland, L. A., Lev-Arey, D. M., & Ziegert, J. C. (2003). An examination of stereotype threat in a motivational context. Human Performance, 16, 181-205.
37. McKay, P. F. Doverspike, D., Bowen-Hilton, D., & McKay, Q. D. (2003). The effects of demographic variables and stereotype threat on Black/White differences in cognitive ability test performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18, 1-14.
38. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. (2002). Doctoral scientists and engineers, by broad field of doctorate, employment status, and race/ethnicity: 1999 (Table 3). In Characteristics of doctoral scientists and engineers in the United States: 1999 (Detailed statistical tables; NSF 02-328). Arlington, VA: Author. (Available online at www.nsf.gov/statistics/ nsf02328/pdf/tables.pdf)
39. Reynolds, C. R. (2000). Why is psychometric research on bias in mental testing so often ignored? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 144-150.
40. Rushton, J. P., & Jensen, A. R. (2005). Thirty years of research on race differences in cognitive ability. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 235-294.
41. Ryan, A. M. (2001). Explaining the Black-While test score gap: The role of test perceptions. Human Performance, 14, 45-75.
42. Sackett, P. R., Hardison, C. M., & Cullen, M. J. (2005). On interpreting research on stereotype threat and test performance. American Psychologist, 60, 271-272.
43. Sackett, P.R., Schmitt, N., Ellingson, J. E., & Kabin, M. B. (2001). High-stakes testing in employment, credentialing, and higher education: Prospects in a post-affirmative-action world. American Psychologist, 56, 302-318.
44. Sackett, P. R., & Wilk, S. L. (1994). Within-group norrning and other forms of score adjustment in preemployment testing. American Psychologist, 49, 929-954.
45. Schmitt, N., Sackett, P. R., & Ellingson, J. E. (2002). No easy solution to subgroup differences. American Psychologist, 57, 305-306.
46. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Ameri cans, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797-811.
47. Thompson, B. (Ed.). (2003). Score reliability: Contemporary thinking on reliability issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48. Thorndike, R. L. (1971). Concepts of culture-fairness, Journal of Educational Measurement, 8, 63-70.
49. Wall, J. E., & Walz, G. R. (Eds.). (2004). Measuring up: Assessment issues for teachers, counselors, and administrators. Greensboro, NC: ERIC Counseling and Student Services and the National Board for Certified Counselors.
50. Wilkinson, L., & the Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations, American Psychologist, 54, 594-604.