Culture and Test Session Behavior: Part I

School Psychology Quarterly

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 263-280

  Frisby, Craig L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033471910     PISSN: 10453830     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0089009     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Armour-Thomas, E., & Gopaul-McNicol, S. (1998). Assessing intelligence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Barona, A., & Pfeiffer, S. (1992). Effects of test administration procedures and acculturation level on achievement scores. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 10, 124-132.
3. Benson, J. (1989). The psychometric and cognitive aspects of test-wiseness: A review of the literature. In L. W. Barber (Ed.), Test wiseness (pp. 1-14). Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.
4. Bleichrodt, N., & Drenth, P. (Eds.). (1991). Contemporary issues in cross-cultural psychology. Berwyn, PA: Swets & Zeitlinger.
5. Bracken, B. (1991). The clinical observation of preschool assessment behavior. In B. A. Bracken (Ed.), The psychoeducational assessment of preschool children (2nd ed., pp. 40-52). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
6. Camilla, G., & Shepard, L. A. (1994). Methods for identifying biased test items. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Cole, M., Gay, J., Glick, J., & Sharp, D. W. (1971). The cultural context of learning and thinking. New York: Basic Books.
9. Deregowski, J. B., & Serpell, R. (1971). Performance on a sorting task: A cross-cultural experiment. International Journal of Psychology. 6, 109-127.
10. Darou, W. G. (1992). Native Canadian and intelligence testing. Canadian Journal of Counseling, 26(2), 96-99.
11. Glick, J. (1968. February). Cognitive style among the Kpelle of Liberia. Paper presented at the meeting on Cross-Cultural Cognitive Studies, American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
12. Glutting, J. J., & McDermott, P. A. (1988). Generality of test-session observations to kindergartners' classroom behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 16, 527-537.
13. Glutting, J. J., & Oakland, T. (1993). GATSB: Guide to the Assessment of Test Session Behavior for the WISC-IIl and the WIAT(Manual). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
14. Glutting, J. J., Oakland, T., & Konold, T. R. (1994). Criterion-related bias with the Guide to the Assessment of Test-Session Behavior for the WISC-III and WIAT: Possible race/ethnicity, gender, and SES effects. Journal of School Psychology. 32, 355-369.
15. Glutting, J. J., Oakland, T., & McDermott, P. A. (1989). Observing child behavior during testing: Constructs, validity, and situational generality. Journal of School Psychology, 27, 155-164.
16. Glutting, J. J., Youngstrom, E. A., Oakland, T., & Watkins, M. W. (1996). Situational specificity and generality of test behaviors for samples of normal and referred children. School Psychology Review, 25, 94-107.
17. Greenfield, P. M. (1997). You can't take it with you: Why ability assessments don't cross cultures. American Psychologist, 52, 1115-1124.
18. Haladyna, T. M., Nolen, S. B., & Haas, N. S. (1991). Raising standardized achievement test scores and the origins of test score pollution. Educational Researcher, 20, 2-7.
19. Hambleton, R., & Slater, S. (1997). Item response theory models and testing practices: Current international status and future directions. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 73, 21-28.
20. Helms, J. E. (1992). Why is there no study of cultural equivalence in standardized cognitive ability testing? American Psychologist, 47, 1083-1101.
21. Helms, J. E. (1997).The triple quandary of race, culture, and social class in standardized cognitive ability testing. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 517-532). New York: Guilford.
22. Hilton, L. M. (1991). Cultural bias and ecological validity in testing rural children. Rural Educator, 12, 16-20.
23. Irvine, S. H., & Berry, J. W. (Eds.). (1983). Human assessment and cultural factors. New York: Plenum.
24. Irvine, S. H., & Berry, J. W. (Eds.). (1988). Human abilities in cultural context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Jensen, A. R. (1973). Educability and group differences. New York: Harper and Row.
26. Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.
27. Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.
28. Kagitcibasi. C., & Savasir, I. (1988). Human abilities in the eastern Mediterranean. In S. H. Irvine & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Human abilities in cultural context (pp. 232-262). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Kaplan, C. (1993). Reliability and validity of test-session behavior observations: Putting the horse before the cart. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 11, 314-322.
30. Kaufman, A. (1994). A reply to Macmann and Barnett: Lessons from the blind men and the elephant. School Psychology Quarterly, 9, 199-207.
31. Kaufman, A. S., Kaufman, N. L., Dougherty, E. H., & Tuttle, K. S. C. (1994). Kaufman WISC-III integrated Interpretive System Checklist for Behaviors Observed during Administration of WISC-III Subtests. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
32. Konold, T. R., Glutting, J. J., Oakland, T., & O'Donnell, L. (1995). Congruence of test-behavior dimensions among child groups that vary in gender, race-ethnicity, and ses. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 13, 111-119.
33. Laosa, L. M. (1984). Ethnic, socioeconomic, and home language influences upon early performance on measures of abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1178-1198.
34. Leichtman, M. (1995). Behavioral observations. In J.N. Butcher (Ed.), Clinical personality assessment: Practical approaches (pp. 251-266). New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Lupi, M. H., & Woo, J. Y. (1989). Issues in the assessment of east Asian handicapped students. Diagnostique, 14, 147-158.
36. McShane, D., & Cook, V. (1985). Transcultural intellectual assessment: Performance by Hispanics on the Wechsler scales. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 737-785). New York: Wiley.
37. McShane, D. A., & Plas, J. M. (1982). Wechsler scale performance patterns of American Indian children. Psychology in the Schools, 19, 8-17.
38. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from person's responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741-49.
39. Miller-Jones, D. (1989). Culture and testing. American Psychologist, 44, 360-366.
40. Millman, J., Bishop, C. H., & Ebel, R. (1965). An analysis of test-wiseness. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 25, 707-726.
41. Mishra, S. P. (1982). The WISC-R and evidence of item bias for Native-American Navajos. Psychology in the Schools, 19, 458-464.
42. Moore, A. (1996). Assessing young readers: Questions of culture and ability. Language Arts, 73, 306-316.
43. Nandakumar, R., Glutting, J. J., & Oakland, T. (1993). Mantel-Haenszel methodology for detecting item bias: An introduction and example using the guide to the assessment of test session behavior. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 11, 108-119.
44. Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., Halpern, D. F., Loehlin, J. C., Perloff, R., Sternberg, R. J., & Urbina, S. (1995). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
45. Oakland, T., & Glutting, J. J. (1990). Examiner observations of children's WISC-R test-related behaviors: Possible socioeconomic status, race, and gender effects. Psychological Assessment, 2, 86-90.
46. Poortinga, Y. H. (1989). Equivalence of cross-cultural data: An overview of basic issues. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 737-756.
47. Poortinga, Y. H. (1995). Use of tests across cultures. In T. Oakland & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), International perspectives on academic assessment (pp. 187-206). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
48. Ribeiro, J. L. (1980). Testing Portuguese immigrant children: Cultural patterns and group differences in responses to the WISC-R. In D. P. Macedo (Ed.), Issues in Portuguese bilingual education. Cambridge, MA: National Assessment and Dissemination Center for Bilingual Education.
49. Relief, A. (1988). Method and theory in cross-cultural psychological assessment. Pretoria, South Africa: Human Sciences Research Council.
50. Rogers, W. T., & Yang, P. (1996). Test-wiseness: Its nature and application. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12, 247-249.
51. Rogoff, B., & Chavajay, P. (1995). What's become of research on the cultural basis of cognitive development? American Psychologist, 50, 859-877.
52. Ryan, J. J., Dai, X., & Paolo, A (1992). Intersubtest scatter on the mainland Chinese version of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. Psychological Assessment, 4, 60-62.
53. Sandoval, J., Frisby, C., Geisinger, K. F., Scheuneman, J. D., & Grenier, J. R. (Eds.). Test interpretation and diversity: Achieving equity in assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
54. Scruggs, T. E., & Lifson, S. A. (1985). Current conceptions of test-wiseness: Myths and realities. School Psychology Review, 14, 339-350.
55. St. George, R. (1982). The assessment of psychological abilities and psychologists' inabilities in the South Pacific. In S. H. Irvine & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Human assessment and cultural factors (pp. 59-80). New York: Plenum.
56. Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (1997). Intelligence and lifelong learning [Special issue]. American Psychologist, 52, 1029-1139.
57. Taylor, R. L., Ziegler, E. W., & Partenio, I. (1984). An investigation of WISC-R Verbal-Performance differences as a function of ethnic status. Psychology in the Schools, 21, 437-441.
58. Teeter, A., Moore, C. L., & Petersen, J. D. (1982). WISC-R Verbal and Performance abilities of Native American students referred for school learning problems. Psychology in the Schools, 19, 39-44.
59. van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1997). Towards an integrated analysis of bias in cross-cultural assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 13, 29-37.
60. Verster, J. M. (1991). Speed of cognitive processing: Cross-cultural findings on structure and relation to intelligence, tempo, temperament, and brain function. In P. L. Dann, S. H. Irvine, & J. M. Collis (Eds.), Advances in computer-based human assessment (pp. 103-147). Dordrecht, Netherlands : Kluwer Academic Publishers.