Selectivity for multiple stimulus features in retinal ganglion cells

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 96, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 2724-2738

  Fairhall, Adrienne L ^a   Burlingame, C Andrew ^b   Narasimhan, Ramesh ^a   Harris, Robert A ^c   Puchalla, Jason L ^b   Berry II, Michael J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF COVARIANCE; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA GANGLION CELL; SALAMANDER; STIMULUS; VISION;

ALGORITHMS; AMBYSTOMA; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS;

EID: 33751234784     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00995.2005     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Adelman TL, Bialek W, and Olberg RM. The information content of receptive fields. Neuron 40: 823-833, 2003.
2. Aguera y Arcas B and Fairhall AL. What causes a neuron to spike? Neural Comput 15: 1789-1807, 2003.
3. Aguera y Arcas B, Fairhall AL, and Bialek W. What can a single neuron compute? In: Advances in Information Processing Systems, edited by Leen TK, Dietterich TG, and Tresp V. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001, p. 75-81.
4. Aguera y Arcas B, Fairhall AL, and Bialek W. Computation in a single neuron: Hodgkin and Huxley revisited. Neural Comput 15: 1715-1749, 2003.
5. Aldworth ZN, Miller JP, Gedeon T, Cummins GI, and Dimitrov AG. Dejittered spike-conditioned stimulus waveforms yield improved estimates of neuronal feature selectivity and spike-timing precision of sensory interneurons. J Neurosci 25: 5323-5332, 2005.
6. Balasubramanian V and Berry MJ 2nd. A test of metabolically efficient coding in the retina. Network 13: 531-552, 2002.
7. Barlow HB and Levick WR. The mechansism of directionally selective units in the rabbit's retina. J Physiol 178: 477-504, 1965.
8. Berry MJ and Meister M. Refractoriness and neural precision. J Neurosci 18: 2200-2211, 1998.
9. Berry MJ, Warland DK, and Meister M. The structure and precision of retinal spike trains. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 94: 5411-5416, 1997.
10. Brenner N, Bialek W, and de Ruyter van Steveninck R. Adaptive rescaling maximizes information transmission. Neuron 26: 695-702, 2000a.
11. Brenner N, Strong SP, Koberle R, Bialek W, and de Ruyter van Steveninck RR. Synergy in a neural code. Neural Comput 12: 1531-1552, 2000b.
12. Bullock TH, Hofmann MH, Nahm FK, New JG, and Prechtl JC. Event-related potentials in the retina and optic tectum of fish. J Neurophysiol 64: 903-914, 1990.
13. Caldwell JH and Daw NW. New properties of rabbit retinal ganglion cells. J Physiol 276: 257-276, 1978.
14. Chichilnisky EJ and Kalmar RS. Functional asymmetries in ON and OFF ganglion cells of primate retina. J Neurosci 22: 2737-2747, 2002.
15. Cover TM and Thomas JA. Elements of Information Theory. New York: Wiley, 1991.
16. de Ruyter van Steveninck R and Bialek W. Real-time performance of a movement-sensitive neuron in the blowfly visual system: coding and information transfer in short spike sequences. Proc Royal Soc Lond B Biol Sci 234: 379-414, 1988.
17. de Ruyter van Steveninck RR, Lewen GD, Strong SP, Koberle R, and Bialek W. Reproducibility and variability in neural spike trains. Science 275: 1805-1808, 1997.
18. DeVries SH and Baylor DA. Mosaic arrangement of ganglion cell receptive fields in rabbit retina. J Neurophysiol 78: 2048-2060, 1997.
19. DeWeese M. Optimization Principles for the Neural Code (PhD thesis). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, 1995.
20. Frechette ES, Sher A, Grivich MI, Petrusca D, Litke AM, and Chichilnisky EJ Fidelity of the ensemble code for visual motion in primate retina. J Neurophysiol 94: 119-135, 2004.
21. Gawne TJ and Richmond BJ. How independent are the messages carried by adjacent inferior temporal cortical neurons? J Neurosci 13: 2758-2771, 1993.
22. Gerstner W and Kistler W. Spiking Neuron Models: Single Neurons, Populations, Plasticity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2002.
23. Golomb D, Hertz J, Panzeri S, Treves A, and Richmond B. How well can we estimate the information carried in neuronal responses from limited samples? Neural Comput 9: 649-665, 1997.
24. Ishikane H, Kawana A, and Tachibana M. Short- and long-range synchronous activities in dimming detectors of the frog retina. Vis Neurosci 16: 1001-1014, 1999.
25. Keat J, Reinagel P, Reid RC, and Meister M. Predicting every spike: a model for the responses of visual neurons. Neuron 30: 803-817, 2001.
26. Lettvin JY, Maturana HR, McCulloch WS, and Pitts WH. What the frog's eye tells the frog's brain. Proc I R E 47: 1940-1951, 1959.
27. Metzner W, Koch C, Wessel R, and Gabbiani F. Feature extraction by burst-like spike patterns in multiple sensory maps. J Neurosci 18: 2283-2300, 1998.
28. Naka K and Sakai HM. The messages in optic nerve fibers and their interpretation. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 16: 135-149, 1991.
29. Olveczky BP, Baccus SA, and Meister M. Segregation of object and background motion in the retina. Nature 423: 401-408, 2003.
30. Paninski L, Pillow JW, and Simoncelli EP. Maximum likelihood estimation of a stochastic integrate-and-fire neural encoding model. Neural Comput 16: 2533-2561, 2004.
31. Panzeri S and Schultz SR. A unified approach to the study of temporal, correlational, and rate coding. Neural Comput 13: 1311-1349, 2001.
32. Panzeri S, Schultz SR, Treves A, and Rolls ET. Correlations and the encoding of information in the nervous system. Proc Biol Sci 266: 1001-1012, 1999.
33. Petersen RS and Diamond M. Coding of dynamical whisker stimulation in the rat somatosensory cortex. Soc Neurosci Abst 57.1 2003.
34. Pillow JW and Simoncelli EP. Biases in white noise analysis due to non-Poisson spike generation. In: Computational Neuroscience (CNS*02). Chicago: Neurocomputing, 2003.
35. Powers RK, Dai Y, Bell BM, Percival DB, and Binder MD. Contributions of the input signal and prior activation history to the discharge behaviour of rat motoneurones. J Physiol 562: 707-724, 2005.
36. Puchalla JP, Schneidman E, Harris RA, and Berry MJ II. Redundancy in the population code of the retina. Neuron 46: 493-504, 2005.
37. Reich DS, Mechler F, and Victor JD. Independent and redundant information in nearby cortical neurons. Science 294: 2566-2568, 2001.
38. Reinagel P, Godwin D, Sherman SM, and Koch C. Encoding of visual information by LGN bursts. J Neurophysiol 81: 2558-2569, 1999.
39. Reinagel P and Reid RC. Visual stimulus statistics and the reliability of spike timing in the LGN. Soc Neurosci Abstr 24: 139, 1998.
40. Rieke F. Temporal contrast adaptation in salamander bipolar cells. J Neurosci 21: 9445-9454, 2001.
41. Rieke F, Warland D, de Ruyter van Steveninck RR, and Bialek W. Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.
42. Rust NC, Schwartz O, Movshon JA, and Simoncelli EP. Spike-triggered characterization of excitatory and suppressive stimulus dimensions in monkey V1 directionally selective neurons. Neurocomputing 58-60: 793-799, 2004.
43. Rust NC, Schwartz O, Movshon JA, and Simoncelli EP. Spatiotemporal elements of macaque v1 receptive fields. Neuron 46: 945-956, 2005.
44. Schneidman E, Bialek W, and Berry MJ II. An Information Theoretic Approach to the Functional Classification of Neurons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.
45. Schneidman E, Bialek W, and Berry MJ 2nd. Synergy, redundancy, and independence in population codes. J Neurosci 23: 11539-11553, 2003.
46. Schnitzer MJ and Meister M. Multineuronal firing patterns in the signal from eye to brain. Neuron 37: 499-511, 2003.
47. Schwartz O, Chichilnisky EJ, and Simoncelli EP. Characterizing neural gain control using spike-triggered covariance. In: Advances in Information Processing Systems, edited by Dietterich TG, Becker S, and Ghahramani Z. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002, p. 269-276.
48. Segev R, Goodhouse J, Puchalla JP, and Berry MJ II. Recording spikes from a large fraction of the ganglion cells in a retinal patch. Nat Neurosci 7: 1155-1162, 2004.
49. Segev R, Puchalla JP, and Berry MJ II. Oversampling of visual space by retinal ganglion cells. J Neuropysiol 95: 2277-2292, 2006.
50. Shapley R and Victor JD. The contrast gain control of the cat retina. Vision Res 19: 431-434, 1979.
51. Strong SP, Koberle R, Steveninck RRdRv, and Bialek W. Entropy and information in neural spike trains. Phys Rev Lett 80: 197-200, 1998.
52. Touryan J, Lau B, and Dan Y. Isolation of relevant visual features from random stimuli for cortical complex cells. J Neurosci 22: 10811-10818, 2002.
53. Victor JD. The dynamics of the cat retinal X cell center. J Physiol 386: 219-246, 1987.
54. Victor JD. The dynamics of the cat retinal Y cell subunit. J Physiol 405: 289-320, 1988.
55. Victor JD and Shapley RM. The nonlinear pathway of Y ganglion cells in the cat retina. J Gen Physiol 74: 671-689, 1979.
56. Wiener N. Nonlinear Problems in Random Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1958.