The information content of receptive fields

Neuron

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 823-833

  Adelman, Thomas L ^a   Bialek, William ^a   Olberg, Robert M ^b  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNION COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CELL FUNCTION; CELL POPULATION; INSECT; MICROELECTRODE; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTIVE FIELD; SPIKE WAVE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0242657499     PISSN: 08966273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00680-9     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Agüera Arcas B., Fairhall A.L., Bialek W. Computation in a single neuron. Hodgkin and Huxley revisited Neural Comput. 15:2003;1715-1749.
2. Allman J., Meizen F., McGuiness E. Stimulus specific response from beyond the classical receptive field. neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 8:1985;407-430.
3. Armstrong-James M., Fox K. Spatiotemporal convergence and divergence in the rat S1 "barrel" cortex. J. Comp. Neurol. 263:1987;265-281.
4. Barlow H.B. Summation and inhibition in the frog's retina. J. Physiol. 119:1953;69-88.
5. Brenner N., Strong S.P., Koberle R., Bialek W., de Ruyter van Steveninck R.R. Synergy in a neural code. Neural Comput. 12:2000;1531-1552.
6. Buračas G.T., Albright T.D. Gauging sensory representations in the brain. Trends Neurosci. 22:1999;303-309.
7. Corbet P.S. Dragonflies. Behavior and Ecology of Odonata:1999;Comstock, Ithaca, NY.
8. de Ruyter van Steveninck R.R., Bialek W. Real-time performance of a movement sensitive neuron in the blowfly visual system. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 234:1988;379-414.
9. Frye M.A., Olberg R.M. Visual receptive-field properties of feature detecting neurons in the dragonfly. J. Comp. Physiol. [A]. 177:1995;569-576.
10. Golomb D., Hertz J., Panzeri S., Treves A., Richmond B. How well can we estimate the information carried in neuronal responses from limited samples? Neural Comput. 9:1997;649-665.
11. Gordon A.D. Classification. 1999;Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
12. Hartline H.K., Ratliff F. Spatial summation of inhibitory influences in the eye of Limulus and the mutual interaction of receptor units. J. Gen. Physiol. 41:1958;1049-1066.
13. Hubel D.N., Wiesel T.N. Receptive fields, binocular interactions and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J. Physiol. 160:1962;106-154.
14. Kolton L., Camhi J.M. Cartesian representation of stimulus direction. parallel processing by two sets of giant interneurons in the cockroach J. Comp. Physiol. [A]. 176:1995;691-702.
15. Kuffler S.W. Discharge patterns and functional organisation of mammalian retina. J. Neurophysiol. 16:1953;37-68.
16. O'Keefe J., Dostrovsky J. The hippocampus as a spatial map. preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat Brain Res. 34:1971;171-175.
17. Olberg R.M. Identified target-selective visual interneurons descending from the dragonfly brain. J. Comp. Physiol. [A]. 159:1986;827-840.
18. Olberg R.M., Worthington A.H., Venator K.R. Prey pursuit and interception in dragonflies. J. Comp. Physiol. [A]. 186:2000;155-162.
19. Rieke F., Warland D., de Ruyter van Steveninck R.R., Bialek W. Spikes. Exploring the Neural Code:1997;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
20. Rodieck R.W. Quantitative analysis of cat retinal ganglion cell response to visual stimuli. Vision Res. 5:1965;583-601.
21. Shannon C.E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Tech. J. 27:1948;379-423. and 623-656.
22. Sharpee T., Rust N.C., Bialek W. Maximally informative dimensions. analyzing neural responses to natural signals Becker S., Thrun S., Obermayer K. To appear in Advances in Neural Information Processing 15. 2003;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. in press.
23. Strong S.P., Koberle R., de Ruyter van Steveninck R.R., Bialek W. Entropy and Information in Neural Spike Trains. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80:1998;197-200.
24. Theunissen F., Sen K., Doupe A. Spectral-temporal receptive fields of nonlinear auditory neurons obtained using natural sounds. J. Neurosci. 20:2000;2315-2331.