Effect of amphetamine on response inhibition in rats showing high or low response to novelty

Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Volumn 85, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 98-104

  Bardo, M T ^a   Cain, M E ^b   Bylica, K E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Amphetamine; Differential reinforcement of low rate of responding (DRL); Drug abuse; Fixed consecutive number (FCN); Individual differences; Novelty

Indexed keywords

AMPHETAMINE;

ADDICTION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DRUG ABUSE; MALE; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; TASK PERFORMANCE;

AMPHETAMINES; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; MALE; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY;

EID: 33751090975     PISSN: 00913057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2006.07.015     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Antoniou K., Papathanasiou G., Panagis G., Nomikos G.G., Hyphantis T., and Papadopoulou-Daifoti Z. Individual responses to novelty predict qualitative differences in d-amphetamine-induced open field but not reward-related behaviors in rats. Neuroscience 1230 (2004) 613-623
2. Ball S.A. Personality traits, disorders, and substance abuse. In: Stelmack R.M. (Ed). On the Psychobiology of Personality (2004), Elsevier, Amsterdam 203-222
3. Bardo M.T., Donohew R.L., and Harrington N.G. Psychobiology of novelty seeking and drug seeking behavior. Behav Brain Res 77 (1996) 23-43
4. Bayley P.J., Bentley G.D., and Dawson G.R. The effects of selected antidepressant drugs on timing behaviour in rats. Psychopharmacology 136 (1998) 114-122
5. Bizot J.C. Effects of various drugs including organophosphorus compounds (OPC) and therapeutic compounds against OPC on DRL responding. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 59 (1998) 1069-1080
6. Cain M.E., Saucier D.A., and Bardo M.T. Novelty seeking and drug use: contribution of an animal model. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 13 (2005) 367-375
7. Depue R.A., and Collins P.F. Neurobiology of the structure of personality: dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. Behav Brain Sci 22 (1999) 491-569
8. de Wit H., and Richards J.B. Dual determinants of drug use in humans: reward and impulsivity. In: Bevins R.A., and Bardo M.T. (Eds). Motivational factors in the etiology of drug abuse (2004), University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE 19-55
9. Donohew R.L., Lorch E.P., and Palmgreen P. Sensation seeking and targeting of televised anti-drug PSAs. In: Donohew L., Sypher H., and Bukoski W. (Eds). Persuasive communication and drug abuse prevention (1991), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, CA 209-226
10. Evenden J.L. The pharmacology of impulsive behaviour in rats: III. The effects of amphetamine, haloperidol, imipramine, chlordiazepoxide and ethanol on a paced fixed consecutive number schedule. Psychopharmacology 138 (1998) 295-304
11. Evenden J.L. Varieties of impulsivity. Psychopharmacology 146 (1999) 348-361
12. Fillmore M.T. Drug abuse as a problem of impaired control: current approaches and findings. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 2 (2003) 179-197
13. Gray J.A. The behavioral inhibition system: a possible substrate for anxiety. In: Feldman M.P., and Broadhurst A. (Eds). Theoretical and experimental bases of the behavior therapies (1976), Wiley, London 3-41
14. Jentsch J.D., and Taylor J.R. Impulsivity resulting from frontostriatal dysfunction in drug abuse: implications for the control of behavior by reward-related stimuli. Psychopharmacology 146 (1999) 373-390
15. Klebaur J.E., and Bardo M.T. Individual differences in novelty seeking on the playground maze predict amphetamine conditioned place preference. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 63 (1999) 131-136
16. Klebaur J.E., Bevins R.A., Segar T.M., and Bardo M.T. Individual differences in behavioral responses to novelty and amphetamine self-administration in female and male rats. Behav Pharmacol 12 (2001) 267-275
17. McClure G.Y.H., and McMillan D.E. Effects of drugs on response duration differentiation: VI. Differential effects under different reinforcement of low rates of responding schedules. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 281 (1997) 1368-1380
18. McGuire P.S., and Seiden L.S. Differential effects of imipramine in rats as a function of DRL schedule value. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 13 (1980) 691-694
19. Perry J.L., Lawson E.B., German J.P., Madden G.J., and Carroll M.E. Impulsivity (delay discounting) as a predictor of acquisition of IV cocaine self-administration in female rats. Psychopharmacology 178 (2005) 193-201
20. Piazza P.V., Deminiere J.M., Le Moal M., and Simon H. Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science 245 (1989) 1511-1513
21. Pierre P.J., and Vezina P. Predisposition to self-administer amphetamine: the contribution of response to novelty and prior exposure to the drug. Psychopharmacology 129 (1997) 277-284
22. Robinet P.M., Rowlett J.K., and Bardo M.T. Individual differences in novelty-induced activity and the rewarding effects of novelty and amphetamine in rats. Behav Processes 44 (1998) 1-9
23. Sabol K.E., Richards J.B., Layton K., and Seiden L.S. Amphetamine analogs have differential effects on DRL 36-s schedule performance. Psychopharmacology 121 (1995) 57-65
24. Tabachnick B.J., and Fidell L.S. Using multivariate statistics (2001), Harper Collins, New York, NY
25. Wenger G.R., and Wright D.W. Behavioral effects of cocaine and its interaction with amphetamine and morphine in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 35 (1990) 595-600
26. Wills T.A., Windle M., and Cleary S.D. Temperament and novelty seeking in adolescent substance use: convergence of dimensions of temperament with constructs from Cloninger's theory. J Pers Soc Psychol 74 (1998) 387-406
27. Zuckerman M. Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking (1994), Cambridge Press, Cambridge, UK