Stream restoration in the upper midwest, U.S.A

Restoration Ecology

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 595-604

  Alexander, Gretchen G ^a   Allan, J David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecosystem management; Monitoring; Restoration; Stream improvement; Watershed

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; STREAM; WATERSHED;

MIDWEST; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

SALMONIDAE;

EID: 33751082367     PISSN: 10612971     EISSN: 1526100X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2006.00171.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Albert, D. A. 1995. Regional landscape ecosystems of Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin: A working map and classification. General Technical Report NC-178. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, Minnesota.
2. Alexander, G. G. 2005. The state of stream restoration in the Upper Midwest, U.S.A. M.S. thesis. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
3. Avery, E. L. 2004. A compendium of 58 trout stream habitat development evaluations in Wisconsin-1985-2000. Research Report 187. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison.
4. Bednarek, A. T. 2001. Undamming rivers: A review of the ecological impacts of dam removal. Environmental Management 27: 803-814.
5. Bernhardt, E. S., M. A. Palmer, J. D. Allan, G. Alexander, K. Barnas, S. Brooks, et al. 2005. Restoration of U.S. rivers-a national synthesis. Science 308: 636-637.
6. Bohn, B. A., and J. L. Kershner. 2002. Establishing aquatic restoration priorities using a watershed approach. Journal of Environmental Management 64: 355-363.
7. Covich, A. P., K. C. Ewel, R. O. Hall, P. E. Giller, W. Goedkoop, and D. M. Merritt. 2004. Ecosystem services provided by freshwater benthos. Pages 45-72 in D. H. Wall, editor. Sustaining biodiversity and ecosystem services in soil and sediments. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
8. Cowx, I. G., and M. V. de Jong. 2004. Rehabilitation of freshwater fisheries: Tales of the unexpected? Fisheries Management and Ecology 11: 243-249.
9. Davis, N. M., V. Weaver, K. Parks, and M. J. Lydy. 2003. An assessment of water quality, physical habitat, and biological integrity of an urban stream in Wichita, Kansas, prior to restoration improvements (phase I). Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 44: 351-359.
10. Downs, P. W., and G. M. Kondolf. 2002. Post-project appraisals in adaptive management of river channel restoration. Environmental Management 29: 477-496.
11. Doyle, M. W., J. M. Harbor, C. F. Rich, and A. Spacie. 2000. Examining the effects of urbanization on streams using indicators of geomorphic stability. Physical Geography 21: 155-181.
12. Freedman, P. L., V. K. S. Breidenbach, D. M. Infante, and A. S. Kumar. 2004. A retrospective look at watershed management, reflected through six WEF sponsored conferences. Watershed 2004; July 2004 (8). Water Environment Federation, Alexandria, Virginia.
13. Gilman, R. T., R. A. Abell, and C. E. Williams. 2004. How can conservation biology inform the practice of integrated river basin management? International Journal of River Basin Management 2: 1-14.
14. Gleick, P. H. 2003. Global freshwater resources: Soft-path solutions for the 21st century. Science 302: 1524-1528.
15. Global Water Partnership. 2000. Integrated water resource management, TAC background paper 4. URL http://www.gwpforum.org [accessed 1 April 2005].
16. Hassett, B., M. Palmer, E. Bernhardt, S. Smith, J. Carr, and D. Hart. 2005. Status and trends of river restoration in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3: 259-267.
17. Hunt, R. L. 1988. A compendium of 45 trout stream habitat development evaluations in Wisconsin during 1953-1985. Technical Bulletin 162. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison.
18. Jenkinson, R. G., K. Barnas, J. H. Braatne, E. S. Bernhardt, M. A. Palmer, J. D. Allan, and The National River Restoration Science Synthesis. 2006. Stream restoration databases and case studies: A guide to information resources and their utility in advancing the science and practice of restoration. Restoration Ecology 14: 177-186.
19. Jungwirth, M., S. Muhar, and S. Schmutz. 2002. Re-establishing and assessing ecological integrity in riverine landscapes. Freshwater Biology 47: 867-887.
20. Kondolf, G. M., and E. R. Micheli. 1995. Evaluating stream restoration projects. Environmental Management 19: 1-15.
21. Laasonen, P., T. Muotka, and I. Kivijarvi. 1998. Recovery of macroinvertebrate communities from stream habitat restoration. Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8: 101-113.
22. Larson, M. G., D. B. Booth, and S. A. Morley. 2001. Effectiveness of large woody debris in stream rehabilitation projects in urban basins. Ecological Engineering 18: 211-226.
23. Lyons, J., and C. C. Courtney. 1990. A review of fisheries habitat improvement projects in warmwater streams, with recommendations for Wisconsin. Technical Bulletin No. 169. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison.
24. Michener, W. K. 1997. Quantitatively evaluating restoration experiments: research design, statistical analysis, and data management considerations. Restoration Ecology 5: 324-337.
25. Moerke, A. H., and G. A. Lamberti. 2004. Restoring stream ecosystems: lessons from a Midwestern state. Restoration Ecology 12: 327-334.
26. Murdock, J., D. Roelke, and F. Gelwick. 2004. Interactions between flow, periphyton, and nutrients in a heavily impacted urban stream: implications for stream restoration effectiveness. Ecological Engineering 22: 197-207.
27. Oberle, S. L., and M. R. Burkart. 1994. Water-resource implications of Midwest agroecosystems. Journal of Environmental Quality 23: 4-8.
28. Palmer, M. A., E. S. Bernhardt, J. D. Allan, G. Alexander, S. Brooks, J. Carr, et al. 2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 208-217.
29. Poff, N. L., J. D. Allan, M. B. Bain, J. R. Karr, K. L. Prestegaard, B. D. Richter, R. E. Sparks, and J. C. Stromberg. 1997. The natural flow regime: A paradigm for river conservation and restoration. BioScience 47: 769-784.
30. Pretty, J. L., S. S. C. Harrison, D. J. Shepherd, C. Smith, A. G. Hildrew, and R. D. Hey. 2003. River rehabilitation and fish populations: assessing the benefit of instream structures. Journal of Applied Ecology 40: 251-265.
31. Roper, B. B., J. J. Dose, and J. E. Williams. 1997. Stream restoration: is fisheries biology enough? Fisheries 22: 6-11.
32. Roth, N. E., J. D. Allan, and D. L. Erickson. 1996. Landscape influences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multiple spatial scales. Landscape Ecology 11: 141-156.
33. Shields, F. D. Jr, S. S. Knight, N. Morin, and J. Blank. 2003. Response of fishes and aquatic habitats to sand-bed stream restoration using large woody debris. Hydrobiologia 494: 251-257.
34. Stanley, E. H. and M. W. Doyle. 2003. Trading off: The ecological effects of dam removal. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1: 15-22.
35. Steen, P. J. 2003. History and inventory of stream habitat improvements for the State of Michigan. M.S. thesis. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
36. White, R. G., and O. M. Brynildson. 1967. Guidelines for management of trout stream habitat in Wisconsin. Technical Bulletin No. 39. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison.
37. Wissmar, R. C., and R. L. Beschta. 1998. Restoration and management of riparian ecosystems: A catchment perspective. Freshwater Biology 40: 571-585.