Restoring stream ecosystems: Lessons from a midwestern state

Restoration Ecology

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 327-334

  Moerke, Ashley H ^a   Lamberti, Gary A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

Indiana; Monitoring; Reach scale; Rehabilitation; Restoration; Streams; Watershed

Indexed keywords

HABITAT RESTORATION; MONITORING; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; STREAM; WATERSHED;

INDIANA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

RIPARIA;

EID: 4644296845     PISSN: 10612971     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1061-2971.2004.0340.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Allan, J. D. 1995. Stream ecology: structure and function of running waters. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts.
2. Bash, J. S., and C. M. Ryan. 2002. Stream restoration and enhancement projects: is anyone monitoring? Environmental Management 29:877-885.
3. Bradshaw, A. D. 1996. Underlying principles of restoration. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53:3-9.
4. Ebersole, J. L., W. J. Liss, and C. A. Frissell. 1997. Restoration of stream habitats in the western U.S.: restoration as reexpression of habitat capacity. Environmental Management 21:1-14.
5. Frissell, C. A., and R. K. Nawa. 1992. Incidence and causes of physical failure of artificial habitat structures in streams of western Oregon and Washington. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 12:182-197.
6. Gordon, N. D., T. A. McMahon, and B. L. Finlayson. 1992. Stream hydrology: an introduction for ecologists. Wiley, New York.
7. Kauffman, J. B., R. L. Beschta, N. Otting, and D. Lytjen. 1997. An ecological perspective of riparian and stream restoration in the western United States. Fisheries 22:12-27.
8. Kondolf, G. M. 1995. Five elements for effective evaluation of stream restoration. Restoration Ecology 3:133-136.
9. Kondolf, G. M. 1998. Lessons learned from river restoration projects in California. Aquatic Conservation of Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8:39-52.
10. Kondolf, G.-M. 2000. Some suggested guidelines for geomorphic aspects of anadromous salmonid habitat restoration proposals. Restoration Ecology 8:48-56.
11. Minns, C. K., J. R. M. Kelso, and R. G. Randall. 1996. Detecting the response of fish to habitat alterations in freshwater ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 23:403-414.
12. Moerke, A. H., and G. A. Lamberti. 2003. Response in fish community structure to restoration of two Indiana streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 23:748-759.
13. NRC (National Research Council). 1992. Restoration of aquatic ecosystems. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
14. Purcell, A. H., C. Friedrich, and V. H. Resh. 2002. An assessment of a small urban stream restoration project in northern California. Restoration Ecology 10:685-694.
15. Rabeni, C. F., and S. P. Sowa. 1996. Integrating biological realism into habitat restoration and conservation strategies for small streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53:252-259.
16. Rankin, E. T. 1989. The Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index (QHEI): rationale, methods, and application. Ohio EPA, Division of Water Quality Planning and Assessment, Ecological Analysis Section, Columbus, Ohio. http://www.epa.state.oh.us/dsw/bioassess/Bio-CriteriaProtAqLife.html#QHEI
17. Roni, P., T. J. Beechie, R. E. Bilby, F. E. Leonetti, M. M. Pollock, and G. R. Pess. 2002. A review of stream restoration techniques and a hierarchical strategy for prioritizing restoration in Pacific Northwest watersheds. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22:1 20.
18. SPSS Inc. 1999. SYSTAT 9 statistics. Chicago, Illinois.
19. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2000. National Water Quality Inventory: 2000 Report. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Report 841-R-02-011. http://www.epa.gov/305b/ 2000report.
20. Williams, J. E., C. A. Wood, and M. P. Dombeck. 1997. Watershed restoration: principles and practices. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.