HydroKorea and CarboKorea: Cross-scale studies of ecohydrology and biogeochemistry in a heterogeneous and complex forest catchment of Korea

Ecological Research

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 881-889

  Kim, Joon ^a   Lee, Dongho ^a   Hong, Jinkyu ^a   Kang, Sinkyu ^b   Kim, Su Jin ^a   Moon, Sang Ki ^a   Lim, Jong Hwan ^c   Son, Yowhan ^d   Lee, Jaeseok ^e   Kim, Sanghyun ^f   Woo, Namchil ^a   Kim, Kyongha ^c   Lee, Buyong ^g   Lee, Byong Lyol ^h   Kim, Sung ⁱ  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

^b Kangwon National University   (South Korea)

^c Korea Forest Research Institute   (South Korea)

^d Korea University   (South Korea)

^e Konkuk University   (South Korea)

^f Pusan National University   (South Korea)

^g Catholic University of Daegu   (South Korea)

^h National Typhoon Center   (South Korea)

ⁱ Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Biogeochemistry; Ecohydrology; Heterogeneity; KoFlux; Multiscaling

Indexed keywords

BIOGEOCHEMISTRY; CARBON CYCLE; COMPLEX TERRAIN; ECOHYDROLOGY; ECOSYSTEM DYNAMICS; ENERGY FLUX; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; FORESTED CATCHMENT; HETEROGENEITY; HYDROLOGICAL CYCLE; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; TEMPORAL ANALYSIS; WATER MANAGEMENT;

ASIA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; KOREA;

EID: 33751048203     PISSN: 09123814     EISSN: 14401703     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11284-006-0055-3     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Baldocchi DD (2003) Assessing the eddy covariance technique for evaluating carbon dioxide exchange rates of ecosystems: past, present and future. Global Change Biol 9:479-492. DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00629.x
2. Baldocchi DD, Falge E, Gu L, Olson R, Hollinger D, Running S, Anthoni P, Bernhofer C, Davis K, Evans R, Fuentes J, Goldstein A, Katul G, Law B, Lee X, Malhi Y, Meyers T, Munger W, Oechel W, Paw KT, Pilegaard K, Schmid HP, Valentini R, Verma S, Vesala T, Wilson K, Wofsy S (2001a) FLUXNET: a new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor and energy flux densities. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 82:2415-2434
3. Baldocchi DD, Falge E, Wilson K (2001b) A spectral analysis of biosphere-atmosphere trace gas flux densities and meteorological variables across hour to multi-year time scales. Agric For Meteorol 107:1-27
4. Blöschl G (1998) Scale and scaling in hydrology - a framework for thinking and analysis. Wiley, Chichester
5. Bear J (1972) Dynamics of fluids in porous media. Elsevier, New York
6. Cohen WB, Spies TA, Bradshaw GA (1990) Semivariograms of digital imagery for analysis of conifer canopy structure. Remote Sens Environ 34:167-178
7. Finnigan J, Clement RJ, Malhi Y, Leuning R, Cleugh H (2003) A re-evaluation of long-term flux measurement techniques Part I: Averaging and coordinate rotation. Boundary Lay Meteorol 107:1-48. DOI 10.1023/A:1021554900225
8. Foken T, Leclerc MY (2004) Methods and limitations in validation of footprint models. Agric For Meteorol 127:223-234
9. Grayson R, Blöschl G (2001) Spatial processes, organization and patterns. In: Grayson R, Blöschl G (eds) Spatial patterns in catchment hydrology: observations and modeling. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3-16
10. Harvey LD (2000) Upscaling in global change research. Clim Change 44:225-263
11. Hipps L, Kustas W (2001) Patterns and organization in evaporation. In: Grayson R, Blöschl G (eds) Spatial patterns in catchment hydrology: observations and modeling. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 105-122
12. 2 exchanges in a hilly KoFlux forest catchment. Water Resource Res (in press)
13. Horst TW, Weil JC (1992) Footprint estimation for a scalar flux measurement in the atmospheric surface layer. Boundary Layer Meteorol 59:279-318. DOI 10.1007/BF00119817
14. Katul G, Lai CT, Schäfer K, Vidakovic B, Albertson J, Ellsworth D, Oren R (2001) Multiscale analysis of vegetation surface fluxes: from seconds to years. Adv Water Res 24:1119-1132
15. Kim J, Kim WS, Cho CH, Choi BC, Chung HS, Lee BL, Kim KH, Kim KR, Kim MY, Lee BY, Lee D, Lee GW, Lee JT, Lim JH, Oh JH, Park EW, Shim JS, Yun JI, Rho CS (2002) KoFlux: a new tool to study biosphere-atmosphere interactions in Asia. In: Lee D, Jin V, Son Y, Yoo S, Lee HY, Hong SK, Ihm BS (eds) Ecol of Korea. Bumwoo Publishing Company, Seoul, pp 215-229
16. Kim J, Guo Q, Baldocchi DD, Leclerc MY, Xu L, Schmid HP (2006) Upscaling fluxes from tower to landscape: Overlaying flux footprints on high-resolution (IKONOS) images of vegetation cover. Agric For Meteorol 136:132-146. DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.11.015
17. Koo J, Son Y, Kim R, Kim J (2005) A study on methods of separating soil respiration by source. Kor J Agric For Meteorol 7:28-34
18. Levesque J, King DJ (1999) Airborne digital camera image semi-variance for evaluation of forest structural damage at an acid mine site. Remote Sens Environ 68:112-124. DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00104-7
19. Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecol 73:1943-1967
20. Levin SA (1993) Concepts of scale at the local level. In: Ehleringer JR, Field CB (eds) Scaling physiological processes: leaf to globe. Academic, San Diego, pp 7-19
21. Lim JH, Shin JH, Jin GZ, Chun JH, Oh JS (2003), Forest stand structure, site characteristics and carbon budget of the Gwangneung natural forest in Korea, Kor J Agric For Meteorol 5:101-109
22. Mandelbrot BB (1982) The fractal geometry of nature. Freeman, New York
23. Mohanty BP, Kanwar RS (1997) A relative-flux-correction scheme for analyzing three dimensional data of a tile-drained agricultural plot. J Hydrol 194:107-125. DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03225-8
24. Peterson GD (2000) Scaling ecological dynamics: self-organization, hierarchical structure, and ecological resilience. Clim Change 44:291-309
25. Reynolds JF, Wu J (1999) Do landscape structural and functional units exist? In: Tenhunen JD, Kabat P (eds) Integrating hydrology, ecosystem dynamics, and biogeochemistry in complex landscapes. Wiley, New York, pp 273-296
26. Skøien JO, Blöschl G, Western AW (2003) Characteristic space scales and timescales in hydrology. Water Resour Res 39(10):1304. DOI 10.1029/2002WR001736
27. Schmid HP (1997) Experimental design for flux measurements: matching scales of observations and fluxes. Agric For Meteorol 87:179-200. DOI 10.1016/S0168-1923(97)00011-7
28. Schmid HP (2002) Footprint modeling for vegetation atmosphere exchange studies: a review and perspective. Agric For Meteorol 113:159-183. DOI 10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00107-7
29. Shugart HH (1996) The importance of structure in understanding global change. In: Walker B, Steffen W (eds) Global change and terrestrial ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 117-126
30. Suh SU, Chun YM, Chae NY, Kim J, Lim JH, Yokozawa M, Lee MS, Lee JS (2006) A chamber system with automatic opening and closing for continuously measuring soil respiration based on an open-flow dynamic method. Ecol Res 21:405-414. DOI 10.1007/s11284-005-0137-7
31. Tenhunen JD, Kabat P (1999) Integrating hydrology, ecosystem dynamics, and biogeochemistry in complex landscapes: report of the Dahlem workshop on integrating hydrology, ecosystem dynamics, and biogeochemistry in complex landscapes. Wiley, New York
32. Vesala T, Rannik Ü, Leclerc MY, Foken T, Sabelfeld K (2004) Flux and concentration footprints. Agric For Meteorol 127:111-116
33. Wainwright J, Mulligan M (2004) Environmental modelling: finding simplicity in complexity. Wiley, New York
34. Wood EF, Sivapalan M, Beven KJ, Band L (1988) Effects of spatial variability and scale with implications to hydrologic modeling. J Hydrol 102:29-47. DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(88)90090-X
35. Wood EF, Sivapalan M, Beven KJ (1990) Similarity and scale in catchment storm response. Rev Geophys 28:1-18
36. Zhang X, Drake NA, Wainwright J (2004) Scaling issues in environmental modelling. In: Wainwright J, Mulligan M (eds) Environmental modelling: finding simplicity in complexity. Wiley, Chichester, pp 319-334