Evaluating computational models in cognitive neuropsychology: The case from the consonant/vowel distinction

Brain and Language

Volumn 100, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 95-100

  Knobel, Mark ^a   Caramazza, Alfonso ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aphasia; Computational modeling; Dissociations; Phonology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPUTER MODEL; CONSONANT; DISSOCIATION; MOTIVATION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PATIENT CODING; PHONETICS; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SPEECH; VOWEL;

EID: 33751005264     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: 10902155     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.06.008     Document Type: Note

References (21)

1. Beland R., Caplan D., and Nespoulous J.-L. The role of abstract phonological representations in word production: evidence from phonemic paraphasias. Journal of Neurolinguistics 5 2-3 (1990) 125
2. Boatman D., Hall C., Goldstein M.H., Lesser R., and Gordon B. Neuroperceptual differences in consonant and vowel discrimination: as revealed by direct cortical electrical interference. Cortex 33 1 (1997) 83-98
3. Caramazza A., Chialant D., Capasso R., and Miceli G. Separable processing of consonants and vowels. Nature 403 6768 (2000) 428-430
4. Caramazza A., and Miceli G. The structure of graphemic representations. Cognition 37 3 (1990) 243-297
5. Cotelli M., Abutalebi J., Zorzi M., and Cappa S.F. Vowels in the buffer: a case study of acquired dysgraphia with selective vowel substitutions. Cognitive Neuropsychology 20 2 (2003) 99-114
6. Cubelli R. A selective deficit for writing vowels in acquired dysgraphia. Nature 353 6341 (1991) 258-260
7. Farah M.J., and McClelland J.L. A computational model of semantic memory impairment: modality specificity and emergent category specificity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 120 4 (1991) 339
8. Glasspool D.W., and Houghton G. Serial order and consonant/vowel structure in a graphemic output buffer model. Brain and Language 94 3 (2005) 304-330
9. Houghton G., Glasspool D.W., and Shallice T. Spelling and serial recall: insights from a competitive queuing model. In: Brown G.D.A., and Ellis N.C. (Eds). Handbook of spelling: Theory, process and intervention (1994), John Wiley and Sons, Chichester
10. Jonsdottir M.K., Shallice T., and Wise R. Phonological mediation and the graphemic buffer disorder in spelling: cross-language differences?. Cognition 59 2 (1996) 169-197
11. Kay J., and Hanley R. Peripheral disorder of spelling: the role of the graphemic buffer. In: Brown G.D.A., and Ellis N.C. (Eds). Handbook of spelling: Theory, process and intervention (1994), John Wiley and Sons, Chichester
12. McCloskey M., Badecker W., Goodman-Schulman R.A., and Aliminosa D. The structure of graphemic representations in spelling: evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 11 3 (1994) 341-392
13. Miceli G., Capasso R., Benvegnu B., and Caramazza A. The categorical distinction of vowel and consonant representations: evidence from dysgraphia. Neurocase 10 2 (2004) 109-121
14. Mirkovic J., MacDonald M.C., and Seidenberg M.S. Where does gender come from? Evidence from a complex inflectional system. Language and Cognitive Processes 20 1 (2005) 139-167
15. Monaghan P., and Shillcock R. Connectionist modelling of the separable processing of consonants and vowels. Brain and Language 86 1 (2003) 83-98
16. Plaut D.C. Double dissociation without modularity: evidence from connectionist neuropsychology. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 17 2 (1995) 291
17. Plaut D.C., McClelland J.L., Seidenberg M.S., and Patterson K. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review 103 1 (1996) 56
18. Plaut D.C., and Shallice T. Deep dyslexia: a case study of connectionist neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology 10 5 (1993) 377
19. Romani C., Grana A., and Semenza C. More errors on vowels than consonants: an unusual case of conduction aphasia. Brain and Language 55 (1996)
20. Ruml W., and Caramazza A. An evaluation of a computational model of lexical access: comment on Dell et al. (1997). Psychological Review 107 3 (2000) 609-634
21. Shallice T., Glasspool D.W., and Houghton G. Can neuropsychological evidence inform connectionist modelling? Analyses of spelling. Language and Cognitive Processes 10 3 (1995) 195-225