Effect of storage conditions on the tensile properties of eco-friendly chitosan films by response surface methodology

Journal of Food Engineering

Volumn 80, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 184-189

  Srinivasa, P C ^a   Ravi, R ^a   Tharanathan, R N ^a  

^a CENTRAL FOOD TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

Chitosan films; Mechanical properties; Response surface methodology; Storage studies

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC HUMIDITY; BIODEGRADATION; ELASTIC MODULI; OPTIMIZATION; TENSILE STRENGTH; THERMAL EFFECTS;

CHITOSAN FILMS; QUADRATIC EFFECTS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; STORAGE STUDIES;

THIN FILMS;

EID: 33750959083     PISSN: 02608774     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. ASTM. Standard test methods for tensile properties of thin plastic sheeting. Annual book of ASTM standards (1995), American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, USA 159-167
2. Arvanitoyannis I.S., Nakayama A., and Aiba S. Chitosan and gelatin based edible films: state diagrams, mechanical and permeation properties. Carbohydrate Polymers 37 (1998) 371-382
3. Butler B.L., Vergano P.J., Testin R.F., Bunn J.M., and Wiles J.L. Mechanical and barrier properties of edible chitosan films as affected by composition and storage. Journal of Food Science 61 (1996) 953-955
4. Caner C., Vergano P.J., and Wiles J.L. Chitosan film mechanical and permeation properties as affected by acid, plasticizers, and storage. Journal of Food Science 63 (1998) 1049-1052
5. Chen R., and Hwa H. Effect of molecular weight of chitosan with the same degree of deacetylation on the thermal, mechanical, and permeability properties of the prepared membrane. Carbohydrate Polymers 29 (1996) 353-358
6. Derringer G., and Suich R. Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. Journal of Quality Technology 12 (1980) 214-219
7. Gontard N., Guilbert S., and Louis cuq J. Edible wheat gluten films: influence of the main process variables on film properties using response surface methodology. Journal of Food Science 57 (1992) 190-199
8. Hasegawa M., Isogai A., Onabe F., Usuda M., and Atalla R.H. Characterization of cellulose-chitosan blend films. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 45 (1992) 1873-1879
9. Hosokawa J., Nishiyama M., Yoshihara K., and Kubo T. Biodegradable films derived from chitosan and homogenized cellulose. Industrial Engineering and Chemical Research 29 (1990) 800-805
10. Hunter J.S. Determination of optimum operating conditions by experimental methods. Industrial Quality Control 15 (1959) 6-12
11. Indrani D., and Venkateswara Rao G. Optimization of the quality of south Indian parotta by modeling the ingredient composition using response surface methodology. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 36 (2001) 189-197
12. Khuri A.L., and Cornell J.A. Response surface designs and analysis (1987), Marcel Dekker, New York, USA
13. Kim K.M., Weller C.L., Hanna M.A., and Gennadios A. Heat curing of soy protein films at selected temperatures and pressure. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und-Technologie 35 (2002) 140-145
14. Kissel L.T., and Marshal B.D. Multi-factor responses of cake quality to basis ingredient ratios. Cereal Chemistry 39 (1962) 16-30
15. Krochta J.M., and Mulder-Johnston D. Edible and biodegradable polymer films: Challenges and opportunities. Food Technology 51 (1997) 61-74
16. Montgomery D.C. Response surface methodology. Design and analysis of experiments. (pp. 445-474) (1997), Wiley, New York
17. Muzzarelli R.A.A., Weckx M., and Fillipini O. Removal of trace metal ions from industrial water, nuclear effluents and drinking water with the aid of crosslinked N-carboxymethyl chitosan. Carbohydrate Polymers 11 (1989) 293-296
18. Myers R.H. Response surface methodology. (pp. 61-106) (1971), Allyn and Boston, Boston, USA
19. Palomar L.S., Galvez F.C.F., and Resurrection A.V.A. Optimization of a peanut-sweet potato cookie formulation. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und-Technologie 27 (1994) 314-318
20. Peressini D., Barvin B., Lapsin R., Rizzotti C., and Sensidoni A. Starch-methylcellulose based edible films: rheological properties of film-forming dispersions. Journal of Food Engineering 59 (2003) 25-32
21. Qurashi M.T., Blair H.S., and Allen S.J. Studies on modified chitosan membranes. I preparation and characterization. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 46 (1992) 255-261
22. Saxena D.C., and Rao P.H. Optimization of ingredients and process conditions for the preparation of Tandoori roti using response surface methodology. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 31 (1996) 345-351
23. Srinivasa P.C., Kumar K.R., Ramesh M.N., and Tharanathan R.N. Properties and sorption studies of chitosan-polyvinyl alcohol blend films. Carbohydrate Polymers 53 (2003) 431-438
24. Srinivasa P.C., Ramesh M.N., Kumar K.R., and Tharanathan R.N. Properties of chitosan films prepared under different drying conditions. Journal of Food Engineering 63 (2003) 79-85
25. Srinivasa, P. C., Ramesh, M. N., Susheelamma, N. S., & Tharanathan, R. N. (2003). A novel packaging for extending shelf life of fruits like mango and vegetables. Indian patent, 88/DEL/2003.
26. Srinivasa, P. C., Ramesh, M. N., & Tharanathan, R. N. (2006). Modeling sorption isotherm of modified chitosan film with plasticizers and fatty acids. Food Hydrocolloids, communicated.
27. Srinivasa P.C., Revathy B., Ramesh M.N., Harish Prashanth K.V., and Tharanathan R.N. Storage studies of mango packed using biodegradable chitosan films. European Food Research and Technology 215 (2002) 504-508
28. Srinivasa P.C., Susheelamma N.S., Ravi R., and Tharanathan R.N. Quality of mango fruits during storage. Effect of synthetic and eco-friendly films. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 84 (2004) 818-824
29. Tharanathan, R. N., Srinivasa, P. C., & Ramesh, M. N. (2002). A process for production of biodegradable films from polysaccharides. Indian patent 85/DEL/2002.
30. Wiles J.L., Vergano P.J., Barron F.H., Bunn J.M., and Testin R.F. Water vapor transmission rates and sorption behavior of chitosan films. Journal of Food Science 65 (1996) 1175-1179