The ‘third hand’: Private sector consultants in public sector accounting change

European Accounting Review

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 447-474

  Christensen, Mark ^a  

^a SOUTHERN CROSS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750938494     PISSN: 09638180     EISSN: 14684497     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0963818042000306217     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Alvesson, M., and Johansson, A., 2002. “ Professionalism and politics in management consultancy work ”. In Critical Consulting–New Perspectives on the Management Advice Industry, Edited by: Clark, T., and Fincham, R., Oxford: Blackwell.
2. Banham, R., 1990. “ The private auditing of public accounts ”. In Budgetary Management and Control: The Public Sector in Australasia, Edited by: Forster, J., and Wanna, J., 183–94. Melbourne: Macmillan.
3. Barton, A., 2002. “ Accrual accounting in government: a review of its applications, achievements and problems and proposals for reform ”. In CPA Australia Annual Research Lecture in Government Accounting, Melbourne: CPA Australia.
4. Baudrillard, J., 1994. Simulacra and Simulation, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
5. Caramanis, C., 1997. The enigma of the Greek auditing profession: some preliminary results concerning the impact of liberalization on auditor behaviour. European Accounting Review, 6 (1): 85–108.
6. Carnegie, G., and Napier, C., 1996. Critical and interpretive histories: insights into accounting's present and future through its past. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 9 (3): 7–39.
7. Carpenter, V., and Feroz, E., 2001. Institutional theory and accounting rule choice: an analysis of four US state governments decisions to adopt generally accepted accounting principles. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26: 565–596.
8. Christensen, M., 2002. Accrual accounting in the public sector: the case of the New South Wales Government. Accounting History, 7 (2): 91–122. NS
9. Christensen, M., and Yoshimi, H., September 2002. “ An international comparison of early and late adopters of public sector accrual accounting. Paper presented at ”. In EIASM International Conference on Accounting, Auditing and Management in Public Sector Reforms September, 5–7. Dublin
10. Chua, W. F., and Sinclair, A., 1994. Interests and the profession–state dynamic: explaining the emergence of the Australian Public Sector Accounting Standards Board. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 21 (5): 669–705.
11. Common, R., 1998. Convergence and transfer: a review of the globalisation of new public management. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 11 (6): 440–450.
12. Cooper, D., Greenwood, R., Hinings, B., and Brown, J., 1998. Globalisation and nationalism in a multinational accounting firm: the case of opening new markets in Eastern Europe. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23 (5/6): 531–548.
13. Corcoran, J., and McLean, F., 1998. The selection of management consultants: how are governments dealing with this difficult decision? An exploratory study. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 11 (1): 37–58.
14. Czarniawska, B., and Joerges, B., 1996. “ Travel of ideas ”. In Translating Organizational Change, Edited by: Czarniawska, B., and Joerges, B., 13–47. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
15. DiMaggio, P., and Powell, W., 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48 (2): 147–160.
16. DioGuardi, J., 1992. Unaccountable Congress: It Doesn't Add Up, Washington, DC: Regnery Gateway.
17. Edwards, J., Coombs, H., and Greener, H., 2002. British central government and “the mercantile system of double entry” bookkeeping: a study of ideological conflict. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27: 637–658.
18. Edwards, P., and Shaoul, J., 2002. Partnerships: for better, for worse?. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 16 (3): 397–421.
19. Egol, M., 1987a. “ Can Accrual Accounting Work in Government ”. In Can accrual accounting work in government?, 1–7. Sydney, Canberra, Melbourne: Australian Society of Accountants.
20. Egol, M., 1987b. “ Can accrual accounting work in government? ”. In Can Accrual Accounting Work in Government?, Sydney, Canberra, Melbourne: Australian Society of Accountants. Video presentation
21. Ellwood, S., 2003. Bridging the GAAP across the UK public sector. Accounting and Business Research, 33 (2): 105–121.
22. Fincham, R., 1999. The consultant–client relationship: critical perspectives on the management of organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 36 (3): 335–351.
23. Fincham, R., and Clark, T., 2002. “ Introduction: the emergence of critical perspectives on consulting ”. In Critical Consulting–New Perspectives on the Management Advice Industry, Edited by: Clark, T., and Fincham, R., 1–18. Oxford: Blackwell.
24. Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., and Hinings, C., 2002. Theorizing change: the role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45 (1): 58–80.
25. Guthrie, J., 1998. Application of accrual accounting in the public sector–rhetoric or reality?. Financial Accountability and Management, 14 (1): 1–19.
26. Guthrie, J., Olson, O., and Humphrey, C., 1999. Debating developments in new public financial management: the limits of global theorising and some new ways forward. Financial Accountability and Management, 15 (3 & 4): 209–228.
27. Haas, P., 1992. Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organisation, 46 (1): 1–35.
28. Hammond, T., and Sikka, P., 1996. Radicalizing accounting history: the potential of oral history. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 9 (3): 79–97.
29. Heald, D., January 2003. “ The global revolution in government accounting ”. In Public Money and Management January, 11–12.
30. Hood, C., 1995. ‘The New Public Management’ in the 1980's: variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20 (2/3): 93–109.
31. Jeppesen, K., 1998. Reinventing auditing, redefining consulting and independence. European Accounting Review, 7 (3): 517–539.
32. Johnstone, D., 1999. Public sector outsourcing and charging in-house bidders for their use of capital. Australian Accounting Review, 9 (1): 33–41.
33. Joint Committee of Public Accounts. 1990. “ Engagement of external consultants by Commonwealth departments, Report 302 ”. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
34. Lapsley, I., and Oldfield, R., 2001. Transforming the public sector: management consultants as agents of change. European Accounting Review, 10 (3): 523–543.
35. Laughlin, R., and Pallot, J., 1998. “ Trends, patterns and influencing factors: some reflections ”. In Global Warning: International Financial Management Changes, Edited by: Olson, O., Guthrie, J., and Humphrey, C., 376–399. Bergen, Norway: Cappelan Akademisk Forlag.
36. Lee, T., 1995. The professionalization of accountancy: a history of protecting the public interest in a self-interested way. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8 (4): 48–69.
37. Lüder, K., and Jones, R., 2003. “ The diffusion of accrual accounting and budgeting in European governments–a cross-country analysis ”. In Reforming Governmental Accounting and Budgeting in Europe, Edited by: Lüder, K., and Jones, R., 1–45. Frankfurt: Fachverlag Moderne Wirtschaft.
38. March, J., and Olsen, J., 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics, New York: Free Press.
39. Martin, J., 1998. Reorienting a Nation: Consultants and Australian Public Policy, Aldershot: Ashgate.
40. McGuinness, P., 1988a. “ Summation ”. In Accrual Accounting Seminar, 115–122. Sydney: NSW Public Accounts Committee.
41. McGuinness, P., 10 February 1988b. “ Populism v accountability ”. In Australian Financial Review 10 February, 59–60.
42. Mellor, T., The view of the Treasury as the regulator. Proceedings of the Seminar on Accrual Accounting–The Scorecard to Da, pp. 15–21. Sydney: NSW Public Accounts Committee, NSW Parliament.
43. Miller, P., 1998. The margins of accounting. European Accounting Review, 7 (4): 605–621.
44. Mizruchi, M., and Fein, L., 1999. The social construction of organizational knowledge: a study of coercive, mimetic and normative isomorphism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 653–683.
45. Modell, S., 2002. Institutional perspectives on cost allocations: integration and extension. European Accounting Review, 11 (4): 653–679.
46. Moore, B., 1988. Administrative chronicle–New South Wales. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 47 (2): 164–170.
47. Mouritsen, J., 1994. Rationality, institutions and decision making: reflections on March and Olsen's. Rediscovering Institutions, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19 (2): 193–211.
48. New South Wales Commission of Audit. 1988. Focus on Reform: Report on the State's Finances, Sydney: NSW Government Printer.
49. New South Wales Government. 2003. NSW Competitiveness Report on-line. Available at http://www.business.nsw.gov.au/facts.asp
50. New South Wales Treasury. 1991. Office of Financial Management Annual Report, Sydney: NSW Government.
51. Newberry, S., 2001. Public-sector accounting: a common reporting framework. Australian Accounting Review, 11 (1): 2–7.
52. Nicholls, D., and Scullion, R., 1988. “ Accrual accounting for government departments: report on visit to the United States of America by Treasury officers ”. Sydney: NSW Treasury. Unpublished report
53. Oliver, C., 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16 (1): 145–179.
54. Oliver, C., 1992. The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies, 13 (4): 563–588.
55. Olson, O., Guthrie, J., and Humphrey, C., 1998. Global Warning: International Financial Management Changes, Edited by: Olson, O., Guthrie, J., and Humphrey, C., Bergen, Norway: Cappelan Akademisk Forlag.
56. Olson, O., Humphrey, C., and Guthrie, J., 2001. Caught in an evaluatory trap: a dilemma for public services under NPFM. European Accounting Review, 10 (3): 505–522.
57. Pallot, J., 1992. Elements of a theoretical framework for public sector accounting. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 5 (1): 38–59.
58. Parker, L., 1999. Historiography for the new millennium: adventures in accounting and management. Accounting History, 4 (2): 11–42. NS
59. Pinault, L., 2000. Consulting Demons: Inside the Unscrupulous World of Global Corporate Consulting, New York: John Wiley.
60. Plater, I., 1988. “ The United States experience ”. In Accrual Accounting Seminar, 52–63. Sydney: NSW Public Accounts Committee.
61. Post, H., 1998. Internationalization of Dutch accounting firms. European Accounting Review, 7 (4): 697–707.
62. Potter, B., 1999. The power of words: explaining recent accounting reforms in the Australian public sector. Accounting History, 4 (2): 43–72. NS
63. Potter, B., 2002. Financial accounting reforms in the Australian public sector: an episode in institutional thinking. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15 (1): 69–93.
64. Regan, E., 1987. “ Accrual accounting in government ”. In Can Accrual Accounting Work in Government, Sydney, Canberra, Melbourne: Australian Society of Accountants.
65. Ryan, C., 1995. Australian public sector financial reporting 1976 to 1993: reforming policy agendas, Griffith University. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis
66. Sahlin-Andersson, K., and Engwall, L., 2002. “ Carriers, flows, and sources of management knowledge ”. In The Expansion of Management Knowledge: Carriers, Flows and Sources, Edited by: Sahlin-Andersson, K., and Engwall, L., 3–32. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
67. Saint-Martin, D., 2000. Building the New Managerialist State, pp. Consultants and the Politics of Public Sector Reform in Comparative Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
68. Salaman, G., 2002. “ Trapped in their wave, the evolution of management consultancies ”. In Critical Consulting–New Perspectives on the Management Advice Industry, Edited by: Clark, T., and Fincham, R., 247–259. Oxford: Blackwell.
69. Scarbrough, H., 2002. The role of intermediary groups in shaping management fashion: the case of knowledge management. International Studies of Management and Organization, 32 (4): 87–103.
70. Scott, W. R., 1995. “ Introduction: institutional theory and organizations ”. In The Institutional Construction of Organizations, Edited by: Scott, W. R., and Christensen, S., xi–xxiii. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
71. Scullion, B., 1991. “ Accrual accounting ”. In National Accountants in Government Convention Gold Coast
72. Soh, D., 1992a. After seven years at the helm, Robson decides to hit the road. New Accountant, 5 (8): 12
73. Soh, D., 1992b. Government focuses on the big picture. New Accountant, 5 (24): 7
74. Stalebrink, O., and Sacco, F., 2003. An ‘Austrian’ perspective on commercial accounting practices in the public sector. Accounting Forum, 27 (3): 339–358.
75. Sturdy, A., 1997. The dialetics of consultancy. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 8 (5): 511–535.
76. Sturdy, A., 2002. “ Front-line diffusion: the production and negotiation of knowledge through training interactions ”. In Critical Consulting–New Perspectives on the Management Advice Industry, Edited by: Clark, T., and Fincham, R., Oxford: Blackwell.
77. Wallerstedt, E., 1999. The emergence of the Big Five in Sweden. European Accounting Review, 10 (4): 843–867.
78. Weeks, A., 1990. “ Accrual accounting and the new budget process–the New Zealand experience Paper presented at NSW Australian Society of Accountants Annual Congress ”. 17–27. Sydney: ASA.
79. Wright, C., 2002. “ Promoting demand, gaining legitimacy and broadening expertise: the evolution of consultancy–client relationships in Australia ”. In Management Consulting: Emergence and Dynamics of a Knowledge Industry, Edited by: Kipping, M., and Engwall, L., 184–202. Oxford: Oxford University Press.