Financial accounting reforms in the Australian public sector: An episode in institutional thinking

Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 69-93

  Potter, Brad ^a  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Accounting; Australia; Institutionalism; Public sector accounting

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986015020     PISSN: 09513574     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09513570210418897     Document Type: Review

References (95)

1. Abbott, A. (1988), The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
2. Adler, E. and Haas, P.M. (1992), “Conclusion: epistemic communities, world order and the creation of a reflective research program’’, International Organization, Vol. 46 No. 1, Winter, pp. 367-90.
3. Aiken, M. and Captanio, C. (1995), “Accrual accounting valuations and accountability: a potentially pernicious union”, Australian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 54 No. 4, December, pp. 564-75.
4. Aiken, M. and McCrae, M. (1992), ‘‘Full cost pricing and public sector reporting: alleviating undisclosed short-run measurement biases of ‘user to pay’ policies”, Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 8 No. 1, Spring, pp. 13-34.
5. Aiken, M. and McCrae, M. (1996), “The commercialization of government's departmental accounting (AAS 29): quasi rents and public welfare”, Abacus, Vol. 32 No. 2, September,pp. 196-213.
6. Australian Accounting Research Foundation (AARF) (1991), AAS 27 Financial Reporting by Local Governments (reissued, 1996), AARF, Caulfield.
7. Australian Accounting Research Foundation (AARF) (1993a), AAS 29 Financial Reporting by Government Departments (reissued, 1996), AARF, Caulfield.
8. Australian Accounting Research Foundation (AARF) (1993b), ED 55 Financial Reporting by Government Departments, AARF, Caulfield.
9. Australian Accounting Research Foundation and the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AARF/AASB) (1990b), SAC 2 Objective of General Purpose Financial Reporting, AARF, Caulfield.
10. Australian Accounting Research Foundation and the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AARF/AASB) (1994), SAC 4 The Definition and Recognition of the Elements of Financial Statements, AARF, Caulfield.
11. Barrett, P. (1994a), “Success in managing accrual accounting – more gain than pain”, ASCPA Seminar, 9 December, Canberra.
12. Barrett, P. (1994b), “Contributing to public sector accountability – an accounting role”, paper delivered at the 10th National Accountants Conference, 2 August, Kuala Lumpur.
13. Barton, A. (1999), “Land under roads – a financial bonanza or fool's gold?”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 9 No. 1, March, pp. 9-15.
14. Bealing, W.E., Dirsmith, M.W. and Fogarty, T. (1996), “Early regulatory actions by the SEC: an institutional theory perspective on the dramaturgy of political exchanges”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 317-38.
15. Boreham, P. (1983), “Indetermination: professional knowledge, organization and control”, Sociological Review, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 693-718.
16. Broadbent, J. and Guthrie, J. (1992), “Changes in the public sector: a review of recent ‘alternative’ accounting research”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 3-31.
17. Carmen, J., Carnegie, G.D. and Wolnizer, P.W. (1996), “Is archaeological valuation an accounting matter?”, Antiquity, Vol. 73 No. 279, March, pp. 143-8.
18. Carnegie, G.D. (2000), “Is collection valuation an accounting matter?”, paper presented at the Australian Registrars Committee Professional Development Seminar, Canberra, 5-6 October.
19. Carnegie, G.D. and West, B.P. (1997), “Observing the PSASB: ED50 and the recognition of infrastructure assets”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 7 No. 2, October, pp. 30-9.
20. Carnegie, G.D. and Wolnizer, P.W. (1995), “The financial value of cultural, heritage and scientific collections: an accounting fiction”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 5 No. 1, June, pp. 31-47.
21. Carnegie, G.D. and Wolnizer, P.W. (1996), “Enabling accountability in museums”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 9 No. 5, pp. 84-99.
22. Carnegie, G.D. and Wolnizer, P.W. (1997), “The financial reporting of publicly-owned collections: whither financial (market) values and contingent valuation estimates?”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 7 No. 1, May, pp. 44-50.
23. Carnegie, G.D. and Wolnizer, P.W. (1999), “Unravelling the rhetoric about the financial reporting of public collections as assets: a response to Micallef and Peirson”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 9 No. 1, March, pp. 16-21.
24. Carruthers, B.G. (1995), “Accounting, ambiguity and the new institutionalism”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 313-28.
25. Conn, N. (1996), “Reservations about governments producing balance sheets”, Australian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 55 No. 1, March, pp. 82-8.
26. Corbett, D. (1996), Australian Public Sector Management, 2nd ed., Allen and Unwin, New South Wales.
27. Covaleski, M.A. and Dirsmith, M.W. (1995), “The preservation and use of public resources: transforming the immoral in the merely factual”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 20 Nos 2/3, pp. 147-73.
28. Department of Finance (DoF) (1992), Guidelines for Financial Statements of Public Authorities and Commercial Activities, DoF, Canberra.
29. Department of Finance (DoF) (1994), Resource Management in the Australian Public Service, DoF, Melbourne.
30. Dezalay, Y. (1995), “’Turf battles’ or ‘class struggles’: the internationalization of the market for expertise in the ‘professional society”’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 20 No. 5, pp. 331-44.
31. DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983), “The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizations fields”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, April, pp. 147-60.
32. Douglas, M. (1986), How Institutions Think, Syracuse University Press, New York, NY.
33. Falk, H. and Neilson, J. (1993), “Financial reporting by local governments and the disproportionate requirements of AAS 27”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 3 No. 2, November, pp. 55-61.
34. Gaffikin, M.J.R. (1996), “What does it all mean?”, paper delivered at the Seminar on Asset Valuation in the Public Sector: Issues in the Controversy, NSW Public Accounts Committee, February 16, New South Wales.
35. Goode, W.J. (1960), “Encroachment, charlatanism and the emerging profession: psychology, sociology and medicine”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 25, pp. 902-14.
36. Gorz, A. (1989), Critique of Economic Reason, translated by Handyside, G. and Turner, C., Verso, London.
37. Guthrie, J. (1993), “Australian public sector accounting: transformations and managerialism”, Accounting Research Journal, Vol. 6 No. 1, Spring, pp. 15-25.
38. Guthrie, J. (1998), “Application of accrual accounting in the APS – rhetoric or reality?”, Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 1-19.
39. Guthrie, J. and Humphrey, C. (1996), “Public sector financial management developments in Australia and Britain: trends and contradictions”, Research in Government and Nonprofit Accounting, Vol. 9, pp. 283-302.
40. Guthrie, J. and Parker, L.D. (1998), “Managerialism’ and ‘marketisation’ in financial management change in Australia”, in Olson, O., Guthrie, J. and Humphrey, C. (Eds), Global Warning: Debating International Developments in New Public Financial Management, Cappelen, Akademisk Forlag, Oslo, pp. 49-75.
41. Haas, P.M. (1992), “Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy co-ordination”, International Organization, Vol. 46 No. 1, pp. 1-35.
42. Hines, R.D. (1989), “The sociological paradigm in financial accounting research”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 52-75.
43. Hone, P. (1997), “The financial value of cultural, heritage and scientific collections: a public management necessity”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 7 No. 1, May, pp. 38-43.
44. Hood, C. (1991), “A public management for all seasons?”, Public Administration, Vol. 69, Spring, pp. 3-19.
45. Hood, C. (1995), “The ‘new public management’ in the 1980s: variations on a theme”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 20 Nos 2/3, pp. 93-109.
46. Hopwood, A.G. (1990a), “Accounting and the domain of the public – some observations on current developments”, in Guthrie, J., Parker, L.D. and Shand, D. (Eds), The Public Sector: Contemporary Readings in Accounting and Auditing, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Sydney, pp. 392-407.
47. Hopwood, A.G. (1990b), “Accounting and the pursuit of efficiency”, in Guthrie, J., Parker, L.D. and Shand, D. (Eds), The Public Sector: Contemporary Readings in Accounting and Auditing, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Sydney, pp. 408-22.
48. Hunt, H.G. and Hogler, R.L. (1993), “An institutional analysis of accounting growth and regulation in the United States’’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 342-60.
49. Jones, S. and Puglisi, N. (1997), “The relevance of AAS 29 to the APS: a case for doubt?”, Abacus, Vol. 33 No. 1, March, pp. 115-32.
50. Laughlin, R. and Pallot, J. (1998), “Trends, patterns and influencing factors: some reflections”, in Olson, O., Guthrie, J. and Humphrey, C. (Eds), Global Warning: Debating International Developments in New Public Financial Management, Cappelen, Akademisk Forlag, Oslo, pp. 376-99.
51. Lewis, N.R. (1995), “AAS 29: a critique”, in Readings in Accounting Developments in the Public Sector 1993-4, ASCPA Public Sector Centre of Excellence, pp. 16-25.
52. Luder, K.G. (1992), “A contingency model of governmental accounting innovations in the political administrative-environment”, in Chan, J.L and Patton, J.M. (Eds), Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting, Vol. 7, pp. 99-127.
53. Luder, K.G. (1994), “The ‘contingency model’ reconsidered: experiences from Italy, Japan and Spain”, in Buschor, E. and Schedler, K. (Eds), Perspectives on Performance Measurement and Public Sector Accounting, Paul Haupt Publishers.
54. Luder, K.G. (1998), “Towards a new financial management for Germany's public sector: local governments lead the way”, in Olson, O., Guthrie, J. and Humphrey, C. (Eds), Global Warning: Debating International Developments in New Public Financial Management, Cappelen, Akademisk Forlag, Oslo, pp. 114-29.
55. Mackintosh, I. (1992), “Accrual reporting for government departments and the whole of government: costs, benefits and opportunities”, CPA Annual Research Lecture in Government Accounting, November, Canberra.
56. McCrae, M. and Aiken, M. (1994), “AAS 29 and public sector reporting: unresolved issues”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 65-72.
57. McGregor, W. (1993), “Convention hears of ED55 standard”, Financial Forum, July, p. 2.
58. McGregor, W. (1999), “The pivotal role of accounting concepts in the development of public sector accounting standards”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 9 No. 1, March, pp. 3-8.
59. McPhee, I. (1994), “Accrual accounting – are agencies ready?”, ASCPA Congress, Victoria, 18-27 October.
60. Ma, R. and Mathews, R. (1992), “What's wrong with ED 55?”, Accounting Forum, November, p. 5.
61. Ma, R. and Mathews, R. (1993), “Financial reporting by government departments: ED 55 – a dissenting view”, Australian Journal of Corporate Law, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 67-88.
62. Micallef, F. (1998), “Art and accountability”, Charter, Vol. 69 No. 8, September, pp. 73-4.
63. Micallef, F. and Peirson, G. (1996), “Financial reporting of cultural, heritage, scientific and community collections”, paper delivered by McGregor, W., ALIA Biennial Conference, October 9, Melbourne.
64. Micallef, F. and Peirson, G. (1997), “Financial reporting of cultural, heritage, scientific and community collections”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 7 No. 1, May, pp. 31-7.
65. Miller, P. (1994), “Accounting as social and institutional practice: an introduction”, in Hopwood, A.G. and Miller, P. (Eds), Accounting as a Social and Institutional Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1-39.
66. Miller, P. (1998), “The margins of accounting”, in Callon, M. (Ed.), The Laws of the Markets, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 174-93.
67. Miller, P. and O'Leary, T. (1990), “Making accountancy practical”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 15 No. 5, pp. 479-98.
68. Newberry, S. (2001), “Public sector accounting: a common reporting framework?”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 2-7.
69. Olson, O., Guthrie, J. and Humphrey, C. (1998), “International experiences with ‘new’ public financial management (NPFM) reforms: new world? Small world? Better world?”, in Olson, O., Guthrie, J. and Humphrey, C. (Eds), Global Warning: Debating International Developments in New Public Financial Management, Cappelen, Akademisk Forlag, Oslo, pp. 17-48.
70. Pallot, J. (1998), “The New Zealand revolution”, in Olson, O., Guthrie, J. and Humphrey, C. (Eds), Global Warning: Debating International Developments in New Public Financial Management, Cappelen, Akademisk Forlag, Oslo, pp. 156-84.
71. Parker, L.D. (1996), “Broad scope accountability: the reporting priority”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 6 No. 1, May, pp. 3-15.
72. Parker, L.D. and Guthrie, J. (1990), “Public sector accounting and the challenge of managerialism”, in Forster, J. and Wanna, J. (Eds), Budgetary Management and Control, MacMillan, Melbourne, pp. 114-27.
73. Parker, L.D. and Guthrie, J. (1993), “The APS in the 1990s: new accountability regimes in motion”, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 59-81.
74. Porter, T.M. (1994), “Making things quantitative”, in Power, M. (Ed.), Accounting and Science: Natural Inquiry and Commercial Reason, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 36-56.
75. Potter, B.N. (1999), “The power of words: explaining recent accounting reforms in the Australian public sector”, Accounting History, NS, Vol. 4 No. 2, November, pp. 43-72.
76. Pusey, M. (1991), Economic Rationalism in Canberra: A Nation Building State Changes its Mind, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
77. Rentschler, R. and Potter, B.N. (1996), “Accountability versus artistic development: the case for non-profit museums and performing arts organisations”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 9 No. 5, pp. 100-13.
78. Rowles, T.R. (1992), “Financial reporting of infrastructure and heritage assets by public sector entities”, Discussion Paper No. 17, AARF, Caulfield.
79. Rowles, T.R. (1993), “Comment: in defence of AAS 27”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 3 No. 2, November, pp. 61-4.
80. Rowles, T.R., Hutton, B. and Bellamy, S. (1998), “AAS 27: a survey of local government views”, Australian CPA, Vol. 68 No. 4, May, pp. 46-9.
81. Ryan, C. (1998), “The introduction of accrual reporting policy in the Australian public sector: an agenda setting explanation”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 11 No. 5, pp. 518-39.
82. Ryan, C. (1999), “Australian public sector financial reporting: a case of cooperative policy formulation”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 12 No. 5, pp. 561-82.
83. Scott, W.R. (1995), Institutions in Organisations, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
84. Sikka, P. and Willmott, H. (1995), “The power of ‘independence’: defending and extending the jurisdiction of accounting in the United Kingdom”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 20 No. 6, pp. 547-81.
85. Tyzack, H. (1998), “Invisible assets”, Charter, Vol. 69 No. 8, September, pp. 72-3.
86. Van Daniker, R. and Kwiatkowski, V. (1986), Infrastructure Assets: An Assessment of User Needs and Recommendations for Financial Reporting, GASB, USA.
87. Walker, R.G. (1988), “Accrual accounting”, Report of Proceedings of the Accrual Accounting Seminar, Report # 38, 5 February, NSW Public Accounts Committee, Sydney.
88. Walker, R.G. (1989), “Should there be common standards for the public and private sectors?”, ASA Research Lecture in Government Accounting, November 8, Canberra.
89. Walker, R.G., Clarke, F.L. and Dean, G.W. (1999), “Reporting on the state of infrastructure by local government”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 441-58.
90. Walker, R.G., Clarke, F.L. and Dean, G.W. (2000a), “Use of CCA in the public sector: lessons from Australia's experience with public utilities”, Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 16 No. 1, February, pp. 1-32.
91. Walker, R.G., Clarke, F.L. and Dean, G.W. (2000b), “Options for infrastructure reporting”, Abacus, Vol. 36 No. 2, June, pp. 123-59.
92. Yeatman, A. (1987), “The concept of public management and the Australian State in the 1980s”, Australian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. XLVI No. 4, December, pp. 339-53.
93. Young, J.J. (1995), “Getting the accounting ‘right’: accounting and the savings and loan crisis’’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 55-80.
94. Young, J.J. (1996), “Institutional thinking: the case of financial instruments”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 21 No. 5, pp. 487-512.
95. Zifcak, S. (1994), New Managerialism: Administrative Reforms in Whitehall and Canberra, Open University Press, Buckingham.