Mixed logit model of activity-scheduling time horizon incorporating spatial-temporal flexibility variables

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1926, 2005, Pages 33-40

  Mohammadian, Abolfazl ^a   Doherty, Sean T ^b  

^a 1120 Science and Engineering Offices   (United States)

^b WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SCHEDULING;

ACTIVITY PLANNING; ACTIVITY-SCHEDULING PROCESS; SCHEDULE CONSTRUCTION; TRAVEL PATTERNS;

MOTOR TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 33645775055     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0361198105192600105     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Jones, P. M., M. C. Dix, M. I. Clarke, and I. G. Heggie. Understanding Travel Behaviour. Gower, Aldershot, United Kingdom, 1983.
2. Recker, W. W., M. G. McNally, and G. S. Root. A Model of Complex Travel Behavior: Part II - An Operational Model. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 20, No. 4, 1986, pp. 319-330.
3. Kawakami, S., and T. Isobe. Development of a One-Day Travel-Activity Scheduling Model for Workers. In Developments in Dynamic and Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis (P. Jones, ed.), Avebury, Aldershot, United Kingdom, 1990, pp. 184-205.
4. Doherty, S. T., and E. J. Miller. A Computerized Household Activity Scheduling Survey. Transportation, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2000, pp. 75-97.
5. Doherty, S. T., E. J. Miller, K. W. Axhausen, and T. Gärling. A Conceptual Model of the Weekly Household Activity-Travel Scheduling Process. In Travel Behaviour: Patterns, Implications and Modelling (P. Bovy, ed.), Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, United Kingdom, 2001, pp. 148-165.
6. Kitamura, R. Sequential, History-Dependent Approach to Trip-Chaining Behavior. In Transportation Research Record 944, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1983, pp. 13-22.
7. Van der Hoorn, T. Development of an Activity Model Using a One-Week Activity-Diary Data Base. In Recent Advances in Travel Demand Analysis (P. Jones, ed.), Gower, Aldershot, United Kingdom, 1983, pp. 335-349.
8. Kitamura, R., C. Chen, and R. M. Pendyala. Generation of Synthetic Daily Activity-Travel Patterns. In Transportation Research Record 1607, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 154-162.
9. Gärling, T., M. P. Kwan, and R. G. Golledge. Computational-Process Modelling of Household Activity Scheduling. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 25, No. 5, 1994, pp. 355-364.
10. Ettema, D., A. Borgers, and H. Timmermans. Simulation Model of Activity Scheduling Behavior. In Transportation Research Record 1413, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993 pp. 1-11.
11. Gärling, T., T. Kalén, J. Romanus, and M. Selart. Computer Simulation of Household Activity Scheduling. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 30, 1998, pp. 665-679.
12. Arentze, T. A., and H. J. P. Timmermans. ALBATROSS: A Learning Based Transportation Oriented Simulation System. The European Institute of Retailing and Services Studies, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 2000.
13. Miller, E. J., and M. J. Roorda. Prototype Model of Household Activity/Travel Scheduling. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1831, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 114-121.
14. Doherty, S. T. Should We Abandon Activity Type Analysis? Presented at 10th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Lucerne, Switzerland, 2003.
15. Doherty, S. T., E. Nemeth, M. Roorda, and E. J. Miller. Computerized Household Activity-Scheduling Survey for Toronto, Canada, Area: Design and Assessment. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1894, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 140-149.
16. Doherty, S. T. Interactive Methods for Activity Scheduling Processes. In Transportation Systems Planning: Methods and Applications (K. Goulias, ed.), CRC Press, New York, 2002, pp. 7-1-7-25.
17. Bhat, C. R. Recent Methodological Advances Relevant to Activity and Travel Behavior. In Perpetual Motion: Travel Behavior Research Opportunities and Application Challenges (H. S. Mahmassani, ed.), Elsevier Science, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2002, pp. 381-414.
18. Ben-Akiva, M., and D. Bolduc. Multinomial Probit with a Logit Kernel and a General Parametric Specification of the Covariance Structure. Presented at 3rd International Choice Symposium, Columbia University, New York, 1996.
19. Revolt, D., and K. Train. Incentives for Appliance Efficiency in a Competitive Energy Environment: Random Parameter Logit Models of Households' Choices. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 80, No. 4, 1998, pp. 647-657.
20. Bhat, C. An Endogenous Segmentation Mode Choice Model with an Application to Intercity Travel. Transportation Science, Vol. 31, No. 1, 1997, pp. 34-48.
21. Bhat, C. Incorporating Observed and Unobserved Heterogeneity in Urban Work Travel Mode Choice Modeling. Transportation Science, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2000, pp. 228-238.
22. Brownstone, D., D. Bunch, and K. Train. Joint Mixed Logit Models of Stated and Revealed Preferences for Alternative-Fuelled Vehicles. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 34, 2000, pp. 315-338.
23. Louviere, J. J., D. A. Hensher, and J. D. Swait. Stated Choice Methods, Analysis and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2000.
24. Rindsfüser, G., H. Mühlhans, S. T. Doherty, and K. J. Beckmann. Tracing the Planning and Execution of Activities and Their Attributes - Design and Application of a Hand-Held Scheduling Process Survey. Presented at 10th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Lucerne, Switzerland, 2003.