Validating simulation-based models of conflict

Simulation & Gaming

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 249-280

  Sandole, Dennis J D ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

75 norm; complexity; gaming simulation; general systems theory (GST); Genesis of War project; identity based conflicts; INTER NATION SIMULATION (INS); PRISONERS' DILEMMA SIMULATION (PDS); triangulation; validation

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750733974     PISSN: 10468781     EISSN: 1552826X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1046878103034002006     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Alcock, J.E. (1974). Cooperation, competition, and the effects of time pressure in Canada and India. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 18(2), 171-197.
2. Bailes, D. W., & Guller, I.B. (1970). Dogmatism and attitudes towards the Vietnam war. Sociometry, 33(2), 140-146.
3. Beriker, N., & Druckman, D. (1996). Simulating the Lausanne peace negotiations, 1922-1923: Power asymmetries in bargaining. Simulation & Gaming, 27(2), 162-183.
4. Bonham, G.M. (1967). Aspects of the validity of two simulations of phenomena in international relations. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
5. Bremer, S.A. (1980). National capabilities and war proneness. In J.D. Singer (Ed.), The correlates of war (Vol. 2). New York: Free Press.
6. Bremer, S.A. (1995). Final words. In S.A. Bremer & T.R. Cusack (Eds.), The process of war: Advancing the scientific study of war. Luxembourg and UK: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.
7. Bull, H. (1966). International theory: The case for a classical approach. World Politics, 18(3), 361-377.
8. Choucri, N., & North, R.C. (1969). The determinants of international violence. Peace Research Society, 12, 33-63.
9. Choucri, N., & North, R.C. (1975). Nations in conflict: National growth and international violence. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
10. Copson, R.W. (1973). Foreign policy conflict among African states, 1964-1969. In P.J. McGowan (Ed.), Sage international yearbook of foreign policy studies (Vol. 1). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11. Driver, M.J. (1965, January). A structural analysis of aggression, stress, and personality in an inter-nation simulation. Paper No. 97 presented at the Institute for Research in the Behavioral, Economic, and Management Sciences, Purdue University.
12. Druckman, D. (1994). Tools for discovery: Experimenting with simulations. Simulation & Gaming, 25(4), 446-455.
13. East, M. A., & Hermann, C.F. (1974). Do nation-types account for foreign policy behavior? In J.N. Rosenau (Ed.), Comparing foreign policies: Theories, findings, and methods. New York: John Wiley.
14. Eberwein, W.D. (1982). The seduction of power: Serious international disputes and the power status of nations, 1900-1976. International Interactions, 9(1), 57-74.
15. Farris, C.D. (1960). Selected attitudes on foreign affairs as correlates of authoritarianism and political anomie. Journal of Politics, 22, 50-67.
16. Feierabend, I. K., & Feierabend, R.L. (1966). Aggressive behaviors within polities, 1948-1962: A cross-national study. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 10, 249-272.
17. Feierabend, I. K., & Feierabend, R.L. (1969). Level of development and internation behavior. In R. Butwell (Ed.), Foreign policy and the developing nation. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.
18. Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Penguin.
19. Gochman, C. S., & Leng, R.J. (1983, March). Realpolitik and the road to war. International Studies Quarterly, 27, 97-120.
20. Gochman, C. S., & Maoz, Z. (1984, December). Militarized interstate disputes, 1816-1976: Procedures, patterns, and insights. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 28, 585-616.
21. Guetzkow, H. (1966, June). Some correspondences between simulations and realities in international relations. Paper presented during the Norman Wait Harris Conference in Celebration of the 75th Anniversary of the University of Chicago.
22. Guetzkow, H. (1968). Some correspondences between simulations and “realities” in international relations. In M.A. Kaplan (Ed.), New approaches to international relations. New York: St. Martin's.
23. Guetzkow, H., & Valadez, J.J. (Eds.). (1981 a). Simulated international processes: Theories and research in global modeling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
24. Guetzkow, H., & Valadez, J.J. (1981 b). Simulation and “reality”: Validity research. In H. Guetzkow & J.J. Valadez (Eds.), Simulated international processes: Theories and research in global modeling (pp. 253-330). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25. Gurr, T.R. (1968, December). A causal model of civil strife: A comparative analysis using new indices. American Political Science Review, 62(4), 1104-1124.
26. Haas, M. (1970, March). International subsystems: Stability and polarity. American Political Science Review, 64, 98-123.
27. Haythorn, W., & Altman, I. (1967). Together in isolation. Transaction, 4(3), 18-22.
28. Hermann, C.F. (1967). Validation problems in games and simulations with special reference to models of international politics. Behavioral Science, 12(3), 216-231.
29. Hermann, C.F. (1969). Crises in foreign policy: A simulation analysis. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
30. Holsti, O.R. (1972). Crisis, escalation, war. Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press.
31. Holsti, O. R., North, R. C., & Brody, R.A. (1968). Perception and action in the 1914 crises. In J.D. Singer (Ed.), Quantitative international politics: Insights and evidence. New York: Free Press.
32. Huntington, S.P. (1993). The clash of civilizations? Foreign Affairs, 72(3), 22-49.
33. Huntington, S.P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon & Schuster.
34. Kaase, M., & Marsh, A. (1976, August 16-21). The matrix of political action: Protest and participation in five nations. Paper presented at Special Meeting No. 22 on Dissatisfaction, Protest and Change in Advanced Industrial Societies, 10th World Congress of the International Political Science Association (IPSA), Edinburgh, Scotland.
35. Klabbers, J.H.G. (2001). The emerging field of simulation and gaming: Meanings of a retrospect. Simulation & Gaming, 32(4), 471-480.
36. Kleindorfer, G. B., O'Neill, L., & Ganeshan, R. (1998). Validation in simulation: Various positions in the philosophy of science. Management Science, 44(8), 1087-1099.
37. Lambelet, J., & Luterbacher, U., with Allen, P. (1978, September 3-5). Dynamics of arms races: Mutual stimulation vs. self-stimulation. Paper presented at the 15th European Conference of the Peace Science Society (International), Geneva, Switzerland.
38. Laulicht, J. (1965 a). An analysis of Canadian foreign policy attitudes. Peace Research Society (International), 3, 121-136.
39. Laulicht, J. (1965 b). Canadian foreign policy attitudes: Some major conclusions. International Social Science Journal, 17, 472-486.
40. Laulicht, J. (1965 c). Public opinion and foreign policy Decisions. Journal of Peace Research, 2(1), 147-169.
41. Leng, R.J. (1983, September). When will they ever learn? Coercive bargaining in recurrent crises. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 27, 379-419.
42. MacKinnon, W. J., & Centers, R. (1958). Social-psychological factors in public orientation toward an outgroup. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 415-419.
43. Midlarsky, M.I. (1975). On war: Political violence in the international system. New York: Free Press.
44. Moore, D.W. (1974). National attributes and nation typologies. In J.N. Rosenau (Ed.), Comparing foreign policies: Theories, findings and methods. New York: John Wiley.
45. Most, B. A., & Siverson, R. (1987). Substituting arms and alliances, 1870-1914: An exploration in comparative foreign policy. In C.F. Hermann, C.W. Kegley, Jr., & J.N. Rosenau (Eds.), New directions in the study of foreign policy. Boston: Allen and Unwin.
46. Most, B. A., & Starr, H. (1989). Inquiry, logic and international politics. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
47. Moyal, J.E. (1949). The distribution of wars in time. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 112, 446-458.
48. Onate, A.D. (1974). The conflict interactions of the People's Republic of China, 1950-1970. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 18(4), 578-594.
49. Peters, V., Vissers, G., & Heijne, G. (1998). The validity of games. Simulation & Gaming, 29(1), 20-30.
50. Powell, C.A. (1969, April). Simulation: The anatomy of a fad. ACTA Politica, 299-330.
51. Raser, J.J. (1969). Simulation and society: An exploration of scientific gaming. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
52. Rummel, R.J. (1968). The relationship between national attributes and foreign conflict behavior. In J.D. Singer (Ed.), Quantitative international politics: Insights and evidence. New York: Free Press.
53. Sandole, D.J.D. (1989). Simulation in the analysis of international conflict: Accessing total systems. Simulation & Games, 20(1), 71-75.
54. Sandole, D.J.D. (1999 a). Capturing the complexity of conflict: Dealing with violent ethnic conflicts of the post-cold war era. London: Pinter/Cassell (Continuum International).
55. Sandole, D.J.D. (1999 b). Simulated violent conflict and war: Implications for ethnic conflict in post-cold war Europe. Simulation & Gaming, 30(4), 506-522.
56. Saperstein, A.M. (1995). War and chaos. American Scientist, 83(6), 548-557.
57. Singer, J.D. (1965, January). Data-making in international relations. Behavioral Science, 10(1), 68-80.
58. Singer, J.D. (1972). The “correlates of war” project: Interim report and rationale. World Politics, 24(2), 243-270.
59. Singer, J. D., Bremer, S., & Stuckey, J. (1972). Capability distribution, uncertainty, and major power war, 1820-1965. In B.M. Russett (Ed.), Peace, war, and numbers. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
60. Tanter, R. (1966). Dimensions of conflict behavior within and between nations, 1958-60. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 10, 41-64.
61. Thompson, J.L.P. (1989). Deprivation and political violence in Northern Ireland, 1922-1985. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 33(4), 676-699.
62. Vasquez, J.A. (1976). Statistical findings in international politics: A data-based assessment. International Studies Quarterly, 20(2), 171-218.
63. Vasquez, J.A. (1987). The steps to war: Toward a scientific explanation of correlates of war findings. World Politics, 40, 108-145.
64. Vasquez, J.A. (1993). The war puzzle (Cambridge Studies in International Relations No. 27). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
65. Vital, D. (1969). Back to Machiavelli. In K. Knorr & J.N. Rosenau (Eds.), Contending approaches to international politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
66. von Bertalanffy, L. (1973). General system theory. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
67. Wallace, M.D. (1972). Status, formal organization, and arms levels as factors leading to the onset of war, 1820-1964. In B.M. Russett (Ed.), Peace, war, and numbers. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
68. Wallace, M.D. (1979, March). Arms races and escalation: Some new evidence. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 23, 3-16.
69. Waltz, K.N. (1959). Man, the state, and war: A theoretical analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.
70. Weede, E. (1970). Conflict behavior among nation-states. Journal of Peace Research, 7, 229-235.
71. Weede, E. (1973). Nation-environment relations as determinants of hostilities among nations. Peace Science Society (International), 20, 67-90.
72. Weede, E. (1976, August 16-21). National position in world politics and military allocation ratios in the 1950s and 1960s: Assertions, evidence, and problems. Paper presented at the 10th World Congress of the International Political Science Association (IPSA), Edinburgh, Scotland.
73. Wilkenfeld, J. (1973). Domestic and foreign conflict. In J. Wilkenfeld (Ed.), Conflict behavior and linkage politics. New York: McKay.
74. Wright, Q. (1964). A study of war (Rev. ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1942)