The emerging field of simulation & gaming: Meanings of a retrospect

Simulation and Gaming

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 471-480

  Klabbers, Jan H G ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^b KMPC ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Diachronic perspective; Disciplinary review; Social cultural capital; Synchronic perspective; Transdisciplinary review

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646401135     PISSN: 10468781     EISSN: 1552826X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104687810103200404     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Apple, M. W. (Ed.). (1995). Review of research in education (Vol. 21). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
2. Apple, M. W. (1999). What counts as legitimate knowledge? The social production and use of reviews. Review of Educational Research, 69(4), 343-346.
3. Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
4. Cecchini, A., & Rizzi, P. (2001). Is urban gaming simulation useful? Simulation & Gaming, 32(4), 507-521.
5. Foucault, M. (1972). The archeology of knowledge & the discourse on language (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). New York: Pantheon. (Original work published 1969)
6. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Random House.
7. García-Carbonell, A., Rising, B., Montero, B., & Watts, F. (2001). Simulation/gaming and the acquisition of communicative competence in another language. Simulation & Gaming, 32(4), 481-491.
8. Graue, E., & Grant, C. A. (1999). What kind of tool is a review? Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 1.
9. Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Klabbers, J.H.G. (1999). Three easy pieces. In D. Saunders & J. Severn (Eds.), The International Simulation & Gaming Research yearbook: Simulation and games for strategy and policy planning (Vol. 7, pp. 16-33). London: Kogan Page.
11. Klabbers, J.H.G. (2000a). Handling complexity and risk in industrial societies. In D. Herz & A. Blätte (Eds.), Simulation und planspiel in der sozialwissenschaften: Eine bestandsaufnahme der intemationalen diskussion [Simulation and gaming in the social sciences: State of the art and international discussion] (pp. 91-144). London: LIT Verlag.
12. Klabbers, J.H.G. (2000b). Learning as acquisition and learning as interaction. Simulation & Gaming, 31(3), 397-424.
13. Klabbers, J.H.G. (2000c, September 19-20). Learning to handle complexity in social systems. In I. P. McCarthy & T. Rakotobe-Joel (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Complexity and Complex Systems in Industry (pp. 616-638). Coventry, UK: University of Warwick.
14. Lather, P. (1999). To be of use: the work of reviewing. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 2-7.
15. Meadows, D. L. (2001). Tools for understanding the limits to growth: Comparing a simulation and a game. Simulation & Gaming, 32(4), 522-536.
16. Popkewitz, T. S. (1991). Apolitical sociology of educational reform: Power/knowledge in teaching, teacher education and research. New York: Teachers College Press.
17. Starkey, B. A., & Blake, E. L. (2001). Simulation in international relations education. Simulation & Gaming, 32(4), 537-551.
18. Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking styles. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Abilities are forms of developing expertise. Educational Researcher, 27(3), 11-20.
21. Sternberg, R. J., Wagner, R. K., Williams, W. M., & Horvath, J. (1995). Testing common sense. American Psychologist, 50, 912-927.
22. Thorelli, H. B. (2001). Ecology of international business simulation games. Simulation & Gaming, 32(4), 492-506.