Concerning the preparation and use of substances with a magnetic susceptibility equal to the magnetic susceptibility of air

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 56, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 1107-1113

  Bakker, Chris J G ^a   De Roos, Remmert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Field inhomogeneity; Field mapping; Magnetic resonance imaging; Shimming; Susceptibility artifacts; Susceptibility matching

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL SHIFT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; MAGNETISM;

FIELD INHOMOGENEITY; FIELD MAPPING; SHIMMING; SUSCEPTIBILITY ARTIFACTS; SUSCEPTIBILITY MATCHING;

HOLMIUM COMPOUNDS;

HOLMIUM; HOLMIUM CHLORIDE HEXAHYDRATE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AIR; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; DEVICE; GAS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETISM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE;

EID: 33750605934     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21069     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Haacke EM, Brown RW, Thompson MR, Venkatesan R. Magnetic resonance imaging: physical principles and sequence design. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1999.
2. Schenck JF. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys 1996;23:815-850.
3. Ballon D, Mahmood U, Kakubowski A, Koutcher JA. Resolution enhanced NMR spectroscopy in biological systems via magnetic susceptibility matched sample immersion chambers. Magn Reson Med 1993; 30:754-758.
4. Olson DL, Peck TL, Webb AG, Magin RL, Sweedler JV. High-resolution microcoil 1H-NMR for mass-limited, nanoliter-volume samples. Science 1995;270:1967-1970.
5. Subramanian R, Lam MM, Webb AG. RF microcoil design for practical NMR of mass-limited samples. J Magn Reson 1998;133:227-231.
6. Doty FD, Entzminger G, Yang YA. Magnetism in high-resolution NMR probe design: general methods. Concepts Magn Reson 1998;10:133-156.
7. Wilson JL, Jenkinson M, Jezzard P. Optimization of static field homogeneity in human brain using diamagnetic passive shims. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:906-914.
8. Wilson JL, Jezzard P. Utilization of an intra-oral diamagnetic passive shim in functional MRI of the inferior frontal cortex. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:1089-1094.
9. Neufeld A, Assaf Y, Graif M, Hendler T, Navon G. Susceptibility-matched envelope for the correction of EPI artifacts. Magn Reson Imaging 2005;23:947-951.
10. Lauterbur PC. Image formation by induced local interactions: examples employing NMR. Nature 1973;242:190-191.
11. Fritzsche S, Thull R, Haase A. Reduzierung von NMR-Bildartefakten durch Benutzung optimierter Werkstoffe für diagnostische Hilfsmittel und Implantate. Biomed Technik 1995;40:29-33.
12. Chauvel B, Cathelineau G, Balac S, Lecerf J, de Certaines JD. Cancellation of metal-induced MRI artifacts with dual-component paramagnetic and diamagnetic material: mathematical modelization and experimental verification. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:936-938.
13. Hoescheler S, Grellner F, Thull R, Greil P, Haase A. Modifying magnetic susceptibility of ceramic implant materials [in German]. Biomed Technik 1997;42(Suppl):39-40.
14. Endruweit A, Fritzsche S, Thull R, Haase A, Baur W. High-performance composites for applications in medical engineering: susceptibility artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging. J Reinforced Plastics Composites 2005;24:131-146.
15. Mueller-Bierl B, Graf H, Steidle G, Schick F. Compensation of magnetic field distortions from paramagnetic instruments by added diamagnetic material: measurements and numerical simulations. Med Phys 2005; 32:76-84.
16. EEC Concerted Research Project. Protocols and test objects for the assessment of MRI equipment. Magn Reson Imaging 1988;6:195-199.
17. Roberts N, Rimmington JE, Foster MA. A new role for tripositive lanthanide ions in test objects designed for quality control checks on magnetic resonance imaging systems. Phys Med Biol 1992;37:1977-1984.
18. Waiter GD, Foster MA. Lanthanide-EDTA doped agarose gels for use in NMR imaging phantoms. Magn Reson Imaging 1997;8:929-938.
19. Conger RL, Selwood PW. Proton relaxation in paramagnetic solutions. J Chem Phys 1952;20:383-387.
20. Mulay LN. Magnetic susceptibility. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1963.
21. Kuchel PW, Chapman BE, Bubb WA, Hansen PE, Durrant CJ, Hertzberg MP. Magnetic susceptibility: solutions, emulsions, and cells. Concepts Magn Reson 2003;18A:56-71.
22. CRC handbook of chemistry and physics. In: Lide DR, editor. 86th ed. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis; 2005.
23. Chu SCK, Xu Y, Balschi JA, Springer CS. Bulk magnetic susceptibility shifts in NMR studies of compartmentalized samples: use of paramagnetic reagents. Magn Reson Med 1990;13:239-262.
24. In den Kleef JJ, Cuppen JJ. RLSQ: T1, T2, and rho calculations, combining ratios and least squares. Magn Reson Med 1987;5:513-524.
25. Walker PM, Lerski RA, Mathur-DeVre R, Binet R, Yane F. Preparation of agarose gels as reference substances for NMR relaxation time measurement. Magn Reson Imaging 1988;6:215-222.
26. Waiter GD, Bannerman R, Lerski RA. Radiofrequency absorption of NMR imaging test materials. Phys Med 1993;IX:19-22.
27. Nettleton HR, Sugden S. The magnetic susceptibility of nickel chloride. Proc R Soc Lond 1939;A173:313-323.