Lake wobegon: Where all teachers are competent (or, have we come to terms with the problem of incompetent teachers?)

Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 103-126

  Tucker, Pamela D ^a  

^a The College of William and Mary   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039230682     PISSN: 0920525X     EISSN: 15730425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1007962302463     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Adams, F. E. (1989). Legal aspects of teacher dismissal for incompetence in the public schools. Doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama in Birmingham, 1988. Dissertation Abstracts International, 50, 311.
2. Arnold, P. S. (1986). Characteristics and management of superior and incompetent secondary teachers. Doctoral dissertation, University of Idaho, 1986. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 1539.
3. Barber, L. W. (1990). Self-assessment. In J. Millman and L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers (pp. 133-146). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4. Bracey, G. W. (1995). The fifth Bracey report on the condition of public education. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 149-160.
5. Bridges, E. M. (1986). The incompetent teacher: The challenge and the response. Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
6. Bridges, E. M. (1992). The incompetent teacher: Managerial responses. Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
7. Bridges, E. M. & Groves, B. (1990). Managing the incompetent teacher. Eugene, Oregon: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management and Institute for Research on Educational Finance and Governance.
8. Bridges, E. M. & Gumport, P (1984). The dismissal of tenured teachers for incompetence (Technical Report). Stanford, CA: Institute for Research on Educational Finance and Governance.
9. Cain, B. L. (1987). Nonformal teacher discipline. Doctoral dissertation, University of Houston, 1987. Dissertation Abstracts International, 48, 1066-1067.
10. Castetter, W. B. (1992). The personnel function in educational administration (5th ed). New York: Macmillan.
11. Clark, D. L., & Astuto, T. A. (1994). Redirecting reform: Challenges to popular assumptions about teachers and students. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(7), 512-520.
12. Conley, D. T. (1991). Eight steps to improved teacher remediation. NASSP Bulletin, 75(536), 26-40.
13. Corcoran, T., & Goertz, M. (1995). Instructional capacity and high performance schools. Educational Researcher, 24, 27-31.
14. Crone, L. J., & Teddlie, C. (1995). Ruther examination of teacher behavior in differentially effective schools: Selection and socialization process. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 30(1), 1-9.
15. Dagley, D. L., & Orso, J. K. (1991). Integrating summative, formative modes of evaluation. NASSP Bulletin, 75(536), 72-82.
16. Darling-Hammond, L. (1990). Teacher evaluation in transition: Emerging roles and evolving methods. In J. Millman and L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers (pp. 17-34). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17. Darling-Hammond, L. (1993). Reframing the school reform agenda. Phi Delta Kappan, 74, 752-761.
18. Darling-Hammond, L., Wise, A. E., & Pease, S. R. (1983). Teacher evaluation in the organizational contest: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 53(3), 285-328.
19. Duke, D. L. (1990). Developing teacher evaluation systems that promote professional growth. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 4, 131-144.
20. Educational Research Service. (1988). Teacher evaluation: Practices and procedures. Arlington, VA: Author.
21. Ehrgott, R., Henderson-Sparks, J. C., & Sparks, R. K., Jr. (1993). A study of the marginal teacher in California. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the California Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, November, 1992. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 356556.
22. Ellett, C. D. (1987). Emerging teacher performance practices: Implications for the instructional supervisory role of school principals. In W. Greenfield (Ed.), Instructional leadership, concepts, and controversies (pp. 302-327). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
23. Ellett, C., Wren, C., Callender, K., Loup, K., & Liu, X. (1996). Looking backwards with the Personnel Evaluation Standards: An analysis of the development and implementation of a statewide teacher assessment program. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 22(1), 79-113.
24. Rase, L. (1992). Maximizing people power in school. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
25. Frels, K., & Horton, J. L. (1994). A Documentation System for Teacher Improvement or Termination. (4th ed.). Topeka, KS: National Organization on Legal Problems of Education.
26. Fuhr, D. L. (1993). Managing mediocrity in the classroom. School Administrator, 50(4), 26-29.
27. Fullan, M. G. (1996). Turning systemic thinking on its head. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(6), 420-423.
28. Groves, B. R. (1986). An organizational approach to managing the incompetent teacher. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1985. Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 2146.
29. Gudridge, B. M. (1980). Teacher competency: Problems and solutions. AASA Critical Issues Report, 5-8.
30. Haefele, D. L. (1993). Evaluating teachers: A call for change. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 7, 21-31.
31. Henderson-Sparks, J. C. (1995). Managing your marginal teachers. Principal, 74(4), 32-35.
32. Holmes Group. (1986). Tomorrow's Teachers. East Lansing, MI: Author.
33. Hunter, M. (1988). Effecting a reconciliation between supervision and evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1(3), 275-280.
34. Johnson, S. M. (1984). Teacher unions in schools. Philadelphia: Temple Universtity Press.
35. Joyce, B., Weil, M., with Showers, B. (1992). Models of Teaching. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
36. Keillor, G. (1985). Lake Wobegon days. New York: Viking.
37. Laing, S. O. (1986). The principal and evaluation. NASSP Bulletin, 70(493), 91-93.
38. Lavely, C., Berger, N., & Follman, J. (1992). Actual incidence of incompetent teachers. Educational Research Quarterly, 15(2), 11-14.
39. Lawrence, C. E., Vachon, M. K., Leake, D. O., & Leake, B. H. (1993). The marginal teacher: A step-by-step guide to fair procedures for identification and dismissal. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
40. Loup, K. S., & Ellett, C. D. (1997). Application of the Personnel Evaluation Standards to local district teacher evaluation programs: Analyses of 14 cases. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL, March.
41. Loup, K. S., Garland, J. S., Ellett, C. D., & Ruggutt, J. K. (1996). Ten years later: Findings from a replication of a study of teacher evaluation practices in our 100 largest school districts. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 10(3), 203-226.
42. Luck, J. S. (1986). The principal and the unsatisfactory teacher: A field study. Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1985. Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 2151.
43. McGrath, M. J. (1993). When it's time to dismiss an incompetent teacher. School Administrator, 50(3), 30-33.
44. McGrath, M. J. (1995). Effective evaluation. Thrust for Educational Leadership, 24(6), 36-38.
45. McLaughlin, M. W. (1990). Enbracing contraries: Implementing and sustaining teacher evaluation. In J. Millman and L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers (pp. 403-415). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46. National Commission of Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
47. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York: Author.
48. Peterson, K. D. (1995). Teacher evaluation: A comprehensive guide to new directions and practices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
49. Popham, J. (1988). The dysfunctional marriage of formative and summative teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 269-273.
50. Poston, W. K., Jr., & Manatt, R. P. (1993). Principals as evaluators: Limiting effects on school reform. International Journal of Educational Reform, 2(1), 41-48.
51. Reagan, B. R. (1983). Quality assurance in education: Borrowing a lesson from business. American Education, 19, 19-22.
52. Rosenshine, B. (1970). Evaluation of instruction. Review of Educational Research, 40, 279-301.
53. Schrag, F. (1995). Teacher accountability: A philosophical view. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 642-644.
54. Shapiro, B. C. (1995). National standards for teachers. Streamlined Seminar, 13(4), 1-5. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 381 502).
55. Shinkfield, A. J., & Stufflebeam, D. (1995). Teacher evaluation: Guide to effective practice. Boston: Kluwer.
56. Staples, S. R. (1991). A study of tenured teacher dismissals in Virginia, 1987-1990. Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1990. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 49.
57. Stronge, J. H. (1995). Balancing individual and institutional goals in educational personnel evaluation: A conceptual framework. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 21, 131-151.
58. Stronge, J. H., & Helm, V. M. (1991). Evaluating professional support personnel in education. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
59. Timar, T. B., & Kirp, D. L. (1988). Managing Educational Excellence. New York: Falmer Press.
60. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (1993a). America's teachers: Profile of a profession. Washington, DC: Author.
61. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (1993b). The condition of education, 1993. Washington, DC: Author.
62. Virginia Department of Education. (1995). Virginia Educational Directory. Richmond, VA: Author.
63. Virginia School Laws. (1992). Code of Virginia 1950. §§ 22.1-303 to 22.1-315. Charlottesville, VA: Michie.
64. Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63(3), 249-294.
65. Webster, W. J. (1995). The connection between personnel evaluation and school evaluation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 21, 227-254.
66. Wheeler, P., & Haertel, G. D. (1993). Resource handbook on performance assessment and measurement: A tool for students, practitioners, and policymakers. Berkeley, CA: Owl Press.
67. Wise, A. E., Darling-Hammond, L., McLaughlin, M. W., & Bernstein, H. T. (1984). Teacher evaluation: A study of effective practices. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
68. Youngblood, S. R. (1994). Supervising the probationary teacher: Growth and improvement. NASSP Bulletin, 78(564), 51-57.