Functional results of navigated minimally invasive and conventional total knee arthroplasty: A comparison in bilateral cases

Orthopedics

Volumn 29, Issue 10 SUPPL., 2006, Pages

  Song, Eun Kyoo ^a   Seon, Jong Keun ^a   Yoon, Taek Rim ^a   Park, Sang Jin ^a   Bae, Bong Hyun ^a   Cho, Sang Gwon ^a  

^a Chonnam National University Research Institute of Medical Sciences   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RANGE OF MOTION; SCORING SYSTEM; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; ARTHROSCOPY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33750586282     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Bonutti P, Neal DJ.Minimal invasive total knee arthroplasty using the suspended technique. Orthopedics. 2003; 26:899-903.
2. Tria AJ Jr. Advancements in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2003; 26:859-863.
3. Tria AJ Jr. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty; the importance of instrumentation. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004; 35:227-234.
4. Haas SB, Cook S, Beksac B. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini midvastus approach: a comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 428:68-73.
5. Laskin RS, Beksac B, Phongjunakorn A, et al. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini-midvastus incision: an outcome study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 428:151-153.
6. Laskin RS. New techniques and concepts in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; 416:74-81.
7. Dalury DF, Dennis DA. Mini-incision total knee arthroplasty can increase risk of component malalignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 440:77-81.
8. Seon JK, Song EK. The accuracy of lower extremity alignment in a total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted navigation system. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2004; 39:566-571.
9. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, et al. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003; 85:830-835.
10. Stulberg SD, Loan P, Sarin V. Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84:90-98.
11. Victor J, Hoste D. Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 428:131-139.
12. Seon JK, Song EK. Navigation-assisted less invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: a randomized prospective trial. J Arthroplasty. (In press).