Evolutionary psychology: Resistance is futile

Psychological Inquiry

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 102-109

  Kenrick, Douglas T ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750572256     PISSN: 1047840X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Note

References (49)

1. Alcock, J. (2001), The triumph of sociobiology. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Becker, D. V., Kenrick, D. T., Guerin, S., & Maner, J. K. (2005). Concentrating on beauty: Sexual selection and sociospatial memory. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1643-1652.
3. Buss, D. M. (2000). The evolution of happiness. American Psychologist, 55, 15-23.
4. Campbell, D. T. (1974). Evolutionary epistemology. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of Karl R. Popper (pp. 412-463). LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
5. Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., & Barkow. J.H. (1992). Introduction: Evolutionary psychology and conceptual integration. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind (pp. 3-18). New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Cornell, C. A., & Neuberg, S. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to 'prejudice.' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 770-789.
7. Crook, J. H., & Crook, S. J. (1988). Tibetan polyandry: Problems of adaptation and fitness. In L. Betzig, M. Borgerhoff-Mulder. & P. Turke (Eds.), Human reproductive behavior: A Darwinian perspective (pp. 97-114). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
8. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. Hawthorne, NY: deGruyter.
9. Dawkins, R., & Krebs, J. R. (1979). Arms races between and within species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 205, 489-511.
10. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist. 5, 408-423.
11. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2004). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities. In A. H. Eagly, A. E. Beall, & R. Stemberg (Eds.), Psychology of gender (2nd ed., pp. 269-295). New York: Guilford.
12. Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573-644.
13. Garcia, J., & Koelling, R. A. (1966). Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning. Psychonomic Science, 4, 123-124.
14. Geary, D. C. (1998). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15. Hamilton, W. D., Axelrod, R., & Tanese, R. (1990). Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 87, 3566-3573.
16. Hart, C. W. M., & Pillig, A. R. (1960). The Tiwi of North Australia. New York: Holt.
17. Haselton, M. G., & Funder, D. C. (2006). The evolution of accuracy and bias in social judgment. In M. Schauer, J. A. Simpson, & D. T. Kernick (Eds.), Evolution and social psychology (pp. 15-37). New York: Psychology Press.
18. Hawkes, K. (1999). Grandmothering and the evolution of homo erec-tm. Journal of Human Evolution, 36, 461-485.
19. Hrdy, S. H. (1999). Mother Nature: A history of mothers, infants, and natural selection. New York: Pantheon.
20. Hyde, J. S. (2005). The sex similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581-592.
21. Janicki, M., & Krebs, D. L. (1998). Evolutionary approaches to culture. In C. Crawford & D. L. Krebs (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 163-208). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
22. Jones, O. D. (2001). Time-shifted rationality and the law of law's leverage: Behavioral economics meets behavioral biology. Northwestern University Law Review, 95, 1141-1206.
23. Kenrick, D. T. (1987). Gender, genes, and the social environment: A biosocial interactionist perspective. In P. Shaver & C. Hendrick (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 14-43). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24. Kenrick, D. T. (1995). Evolutionary theory versus the confederacy of dunces. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 56-61.
25. Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 75-133.
26. Kenrick, D. T., Li, N. P., & Burner, J. (2003). Dynamical evolutionary psychology: Individual decision-rules and emergent social norms. Psychological Review, 110, 3-28.
27. Kenrick, D. T.. Maner, J. K., Butner, J., Li, N. P., Becker, D. V., & Schauer, M. (2002). Dynamic evolutionary psychology: Mapping the domains of the new interactionist paradigm. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 347-356.
28. Kenrick. D. T., & Sundie, J. M. (in press). Dynamical evolutionary psychology and mathematical modeling: Quantifying the implications of qualitative biases. In S.W. Gangestad & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), The evolution of mind: Fundamental questions and controversies. New York: Guilford.
29. Kenrick, D. T., Trost, M. R., & Sundie, J. M. (2004). Sex-roles as adaptations: An evolutionary perspective on gender differences and similarities. In A. H. Eagly, A. Beall, & R. Sternberg (Eds.), Psychology of gender (pp. 65-91). New York: Guilford.
30. Krebs, D. L., & Denton, K. (1997). Social illusions and self-deception: The evolution of biases in social perception. In J. A. Simpson & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 21-48). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
31. Lumsden, C. J., & Wilson, E. O. (1981). Genes, mind, & culture: The coevolutionary process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Maner, J. K., Kenrick, D. T., Becker, D. V., Delton, A. W., Hofer, B., Wilbur, C. J., et al. (2003). Sexually selective cognition: Beauty captures the mind of the beholder. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 6, 1107-1120.
33. Norenzayan, A., & Heine, S. J. (2005). Psychological universals: What are they and how can we know? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 763-784.
34. Norenzayan, A., Schaller, M., & Heine, S. J. (2006). Evolution and culture. In M. Schaller, J. A. Simpson, & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolution and social psychology (pp. 343-366). New York: Psychology Press.
35. Nowak, A., & Vallacher, R. R. (1998). Dynamical social psychology. New York: Guilford.
36. Park, J. H., & Schaller, M. (2005). Does attitude similarity serve as a heuristic cue for kinship? Evidence of an implicit cognitive association. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 158-170.
37. Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate. New York: Viking Penguin.
38. Ridley, M. (1993). The red queen: Sex and the evolution of human nature. New York: McMillan.
39. Rose, H., & Rose, S. (2000). Alas poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology. London: Harmony Books.
40. Schaller, M., Park, J. H., & Faulkner, J. (2003). Prehistoric dangers and contemporary prejudices. European Review of Social Psychology, 14, 105-137.
41. Schmitt, D. P., & International Sexuality Description Project. (2003). Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: Tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 85, 85-104.
42. Segerstrale, U. (2000). Defenders of the truth: The battle for science in the sociology debate and beyond. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
43. Sundie, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Griskevicius, V., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Evolutionary social influence. In M. Schaller, J. A. Simpson, & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolution and social psychology (pp. 287-316). New York: Psychology Press.
44. Taylor, S. E., Klein, L. C., Lewis, B. P., Gruenewald, T. L., Gurung, R. A. R., & Updegraff, J. A. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review, 107, 411-429.
45. Tonkinson, R. (1978). The Mardudjara aborigines: Living the dream in the Australia's desert. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
46. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind (pp. 19-136). New York: Oxford University Press.
47. Tybur, J. M., Miller, G. F, & Gangestad, S. W. (in press). Testing the controversy: An empirical examination of adaptationists' attitudes toward politics and science. Human Nature.
48. Van Vugt, M., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2006). The altruism puzzle: Psychological adaptation for prosocial behavior. In M. Schaller, J. A. Simpson, & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolution and social Psychology (pp. 237-261). New York: Psychology Press.
49. Wilcoxon, H., Dragoin, E., & Kral, P. (1971). Illness-induced aversion in rats and quail: Relative salience of visual gustatory cues. Science, 171, 826-828.