Molecular recognition: Preorganization of a bis(pyrrole) schiff base derivative for tight dimerization by hydrogen bonding

Chemistry - A European Journal

Volumn 12, Issue 31, 2006, Pages 7987-7999

  Munro, Orde Q ^a   Joubert, Sandra D ^a   Grimmer, Craig D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Dimerization; Hydrogen bonds; Molecular recognition; Schiff bases; Self assembly

Indexed keywords

CONFORMATIONS; DERIVATIVES; DIMERIZATION; ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE; HYDROGEN BONDS; SELF ASSEMBLY;

ELECTROSTATIC INTERACTIONS; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; SCHIFF BASES;

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

EID: 33750571377     PISSN: 09476539     EISSN: 15213765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200600403     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. J. H. Weber, Inorg. Chem. 1967, 6, 258-262.
2. C. Stern, F. Franceschi, E. Solari, C. Floriani, N. Re, R. Scopelliti, J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 595, 86-95.
3. A. Bacchi, M. Carcelli, L. Gabba, S. Ianelli, P. Pelagatti, G. Pelizzi, D. Rogolino, Inorg. Chim. Acta 2003, 342, 229-235.
4. a) N. A. Bailey, S. E. Hull, Cryst. Struct. Commun. 1976, 5, 447-450;
5. b) C. Kabuto, T. Kikuchi, H. Yokoi, M. Iwaizumi, Chem. Lett. 1984, 573-574;
6. c) J. Sakon, A. Reiter, K. Bowman-Mertes, F. Takusagawa, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C 1989, 45, 1311-1314.
7. L. Yang, Q. Chen, Y. Li, S. Xiong, G. Li, J. S. Ma, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 1478-1487.
8. F. Franceschi, G. Guillemot, E. Solari, C. Floriani, N. Re, H. Birkedal, P. Pattison, Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 1468-1478.
9. S. D. Reid, A. J. Blake, W. Kockenberger, C. Wilson, J. B. Love, Dalton Trans. 2003, 4387-4388.
10. C. D. Berube, S. Gambarotta, G. P. A. Yap, P. G. Cozzi Organometallics 2003, 22, 434-439.
11. U. Mueller-Westerhoff, A. L. Rheingold, M. B. Allen, Private Communication to the CSD, 1996, Ref. code NACRAK;
12. F. H. Allen, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B 2002, 58, 380-388.
13. Z. Wu, Q. Chen, S. Xiong, B. Xin, Z. Zhao, L. Jiang, J. S. Ma, Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 3393-3396;
14. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3271-3274;.
15. O. Q. Munro, G. L. Camp, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C 2003, 59, o672-o675.
16. J. L. Sessler, G. Berthon-Gelloz, P. A. Gale, S. Camiolo, E. V. Anslyn, P. Anzenbacher Jr., H. Furuta, G. J. Kirkovits, V. M. Lynch, H. Maeda, P. Morosini, M. Scherer, J. Shriver, R. S. Zimmerman, Polyhedron 2003, 22, 2963-2983.
17. In compound 7, adventitious water is included in the H-bonding network to give a polymeric structure.
18. O. Q. Munro, S. D. Strydom, C. Grimmer, New J. Chem. 2004, 28, 34-42.
19. G. R. Desiraju, T. Steiner, The Weak Hydrogen Bond in Structural Chemistry and Biology, Oxford University Press, 1999.
20. T. Steiner, Chem. Commun. 1997, 727-734.
21. F. H. Allen, W. D. S. Motherwell, P. R. Raithby, G. P. Shields, R. Taylor, New J. Chem. 1999, 23, 25-34.
22. Shorter H⋯acceptor distances do not necessarily correlate with stronger hydrogen bonds because of crystal packing effects, orientation angles, and other intermolecular interactions.
23. Strictly speaking, the mean hydrogen-bond distance of 4 is equal (within an error bound of 4σ) to the average distance of 2.16(6) Å for the seven compounds listed in Table 2.
24. T. Steiner, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 50-80;
25. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 48-76.
26. S. Matsui, Y. Yoshida, Y. Takagi, T. P. Spaniol, J. Okuda, J. Organomet. Chem. 2004, 689, 1155-1164.
27. N. Davidović, D. Matković-Čalogović, Z. Popović, L. Fišer-Jakić, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C 1999, 55, 119-120.
28. R. M. Bellabarba, P. T. Gomes, S. I. Pascu, Dalton Trans. 2003, 4431-4436.
29. T. D. Hamilton, L. R. MacGillivray, Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 2005, 40, 109-152.
30. a) J. L. Rowsell, O. M. Yaghi, Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 4748-4758;
31. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4670-4679;
32. b) S. Kitagawa, K. Uemura, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2005, 34, 109-119;
33. B. Kesanli, W. Lin, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 246, 305-326.
34. L. Dobrzanska, G. O. Lloyd, H. G. Raubenheimer, L. J. Barbour, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 698-699.
35. H. Chun, D. N. Dybtsev, H. Kim, K. Kim, Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 3521-3529.
36. a) Y. Li, R. T. Yang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 726-727;
37. b) T. Sagara, J. Ortony, E. Ganz, J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123, 214707.
38. M. L. Connolly, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 1118-1124.
39. L. J. Barbour, J. Supramol. Chem. 2001, 1, 189-191.
40. OSCAIL Version X, P. McArdle, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1995, 28, 65.
41. P. McArdle, D. Cunningham, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2000, 33, 993.
42. J. L. Atwood, L. Barbour, P. K. Thallapally, T. B. Wirsig, Chem. Commun. 2005, 51-53.
43. The same polymorph of 4 was obtained by slow evaporation of a solution of the Schiff base in ethanol or diffusion of hexane into a dichloromethane solution of the compound, which suggests that the C2/c polymorph is thermodynamically preferred. Phase changes and polymorphism may well not be energetically feasible in this system.
44. T. Friščić, L. R. MacGillivray, Chem. Commun. 2005, 5748-5750.
45. R. K. Harris, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy : A Physico-chemical View, 2nd ed., Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow, 1986.
46. -2).
47. O. Q. Munro, K. du Toit, S. E. Drewes, N. R. Crouch, D. A. Mulholland, New J. Chem. 2006, 30, 197-207.
48. O. Q. Munro, L. Mariah, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B 2004, 60, 598-608.
49. a) Z. Hajnal, G. M. Keserü, K. Simon, J. Mol. Struct.: THEOCHEM 1999, 463, 169-174;
50. b) R. Thaimattam, F. Xue, J. A. R. P. Sarma, T. C. W. Mak, G. R. Desiraju, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 4432-4445.
51. M. W. Wong, M. J. Frisch, K. B. Wiberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 4776-4782.
52. 2-symmetric dimer structure of 4 at the B3LYP/6-31+G* level of theory and found that the mean H⋯A distance is shorter (1.998(0) Å) than that of the X-ray structure (2.04(3) Å).
53. J. S. Binkley, J. A. Pople, W. J. Hehre, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 939-947.
54. R. S. Mulliken, J. Chem. Phys. 1955, 23, 1833-1840.
55. J. B. Foresman, A. Frisch, Exploring Chemistry with Electronic Structure Methods, 2nd ed., Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1996.
56. S. Simon, M. Duran, J. J. Dannenberg, J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 105, 11024-11031.
57. C. J. Jones in Inorganic Experiments (Ed. : J. D. Woollins), VCH, Cambridge, 1994, pp. 127-132.
58. CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED, Version 170, Oxford Diffraction Ltd., 20 Nuffield Way, Abingdon, OX14 1RL, UK, 2002.
59. L. J. Farrugia, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1999, 32, 837-837.
60. G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXS-97 and SHELXL-97, Programs for the Solution and Refinement of Crystal Structures, University of Göttingen, Germany, 1997.
61. K. Marat, SpinWorks 2.5.1, Program for Processing NMR Data, University of Manitoba, Canada, 2005.
62. O. Q. Munro, S. C. Shabalala, N. J. Brown, Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 3303-3317.
63. PeakFit Version 4.0, AISN Software Inc., SPSS Science, Chicago, IL 60606-6307, USA.
64. M. J. S. Dewar, E. G. Zoebisch, E. F. Healy, J. J. P. Stewart, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 3902-3909.
65. M. A. Thompson, Planaria Software LLC, Seattle, WA, http://www.arguslab. com, 2005.
66. Gaussian 03 (Revision C.02), M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, V. G. Zakrzewski, J. A. Montgomery, R. E. Stratmann, J. C. Burant, S. Dapprich, J. M. Millam, A. D. Daniels, K. N. Kudin, M. C. Strain, O. Farkas, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, M. Cossi, R. Cammi, B. Mennucci, C. Pomelli, C. Adamo, S. Clifford, J. Ochterski, G. A. Petersson, P. Y. Ayala, Q. Cui, K. Morokuma, D. K. Malick, A. D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachari, J. B. Foresman, J. Cioslowski, J. V. Ortiz, B. B. Stefanov, G. Liu, A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Komaromi, R. Gomperts, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, T. Keith, M. A. Al-Laham, C. Y. Peng, A. Nanayakkara, C. Gonzalez, M. Challacombe, P. M. W. Gill, B. G. Johnson, W. Chen, M. W. Wong, J. L. Andres, M. Head-Gordon, E. S. Replogle, and J. A. Pople, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh PA, 2003.
67. HyperChem, Version 6.03. Hypercube Inc., 1115 NW 4th Street, Gainsville, FL 32601-4256, USA, 2000.
68. KyPlot Version 3.0, Kyence Inc., http://kyence.com/, 2002.