Achieving relationship harmony in groups and its consequence for group performance

Asian Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 195-202

  Lun, Vivian Miu Chi ^a   Bond, Michael Harris ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Group performance; Relationship harmony

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750547397     PISSN: 13672223     EISSN: 1467839X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2006.00197.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Asendorpf, J. B. & Wilpers, S. (1998). Personality effects on social relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1531-1544.
2. Bond, M. H. & Ng, I. W. C. (2004). The depth of a group's personality resources: Impacts on group process and group performance. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 285-300.
3. Carron, A. V. & Brawley, L. R. (2000). Cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues. Small Group Research, 31, 89-106.
4. Costa, P. T. Jr & McCrae, R. R. (1992). The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
5. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
6. Dion, K. L. (2000). Group cohesion: From 'field of forces' to multidimensional construct. Group Dynamics, Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 7-26.
7. Gabrenya, W. K. Jr & Hwang, K. K. (1996). Chinese social interaction: Harmony and hierarchy on the good earth. In: M. H. Bond, ed. The Handbook of Chinese Psychology, pp. 309-321. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
8. Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, L. A. & Hair, E. C. (1996). Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: The case for agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 820-835.
9. Gudykunst, W. B., Matsumoto, Y., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishida, T., Kim, K. & Heyman, S. (1996). The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self-construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures. Human Communication Research, 22, 510-543.
10. Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In: J. W. Lorsch, ed. Handbook of Organizational Behavior, pp. 315-342. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11. Hogan, J. & Ones, D. S. (1997). Conscientiousness and integrity at work. In: R. Hogan, J. Johnson & S. Briggs, eds. Handbook of Personality Psychology, pp. 849-870. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12. Hurley, J. R. (1998). Agency and communion as related to 'Big Five' Self-representations and subsequent behavior in small groups. Journal of Psychology, 132, 337-351.
13. Kashy, D. A. & Kenny, D. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In: H. Reis & C. M. Judd, eds. Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology, pp. 451-477. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Kenny, D. A. & Cook, W. (1999). Partner effects in relationship research: Conceptual issues, analytic difficulties, and illustrations. Personal Relationships, 6, 433-448.
15. Kenny, D. A., Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., Livi, S. & Kashy, D. A. (2002). The statistical analysis of data from small groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 126-137.
16. Kurtz, J. E. & Sherker, J. L. (2003). Relationship quality, trait similarity, and self-other agreement on personality ratings in college roommates. Journal of Personality, 71, 21-48.
17. Kwan, V. S. Y., Bond, M. H. & Singelis, T. M. (1997). Pancultural explanation for life satisfaction: Adding relationship harmony to self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1038-1051.
18. Levine, J. M. & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585-634.
19. Maassen, G. H. & Bakker, A. B. (2001). Suppressor variables in path models: Definitions and interpretations. Sociological Methods and Research, 30, 241-270.
20. McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T. Jr (1989). The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins' circumplex and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 586-595.
21. McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T. Jr (1997). Conceptions and correlates of Openness to Experience. In: R. Hogan, J. Johnson & S. Briggs, eds. Handbook of Personality Psychology, pp. 825-847. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
22. McCrae, R. R. & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175-215.
23. Markus, H. R. & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
24. Mullen, B. & Cooper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210-227.
25. Ross, S. R., Rausch, M. K. & Canada, K. (2003). Competition and cooperation in the Five Factor Model: Individual differences in achievement orientation. Journal of Psychology, 137, 323-337.
26. Stewart, S. M., Rao, N., Bond, M. H., McBride-Chang, C., Fielding, R. & Kennard, B. D. (1998). Chinese dimensions of parenting: Broadening Western predictors and outcomes. International Journal of Psychology, 33, 345-358.
27. Van Vianen, A. E. M. & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2001). Personality in teams: Its relationship to social cohesion, task cohesion, and team performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, 97-120.
28. Watson, D. & Clark, L. A. (1997). Extraversion and its positive emotional core. In: R. Hogan, J. Johnson & S. Briggs, eds. Handbook of Personality Psychology, pp. 767-793. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
29. Wiebe, D. J. & Smith, T. W. (1997). Personality and health: Progress and problems in psychosomatics. In: R. Hogan, J. Johnson & S. Briggs, eds. Handbook of Personality Psychology, pp. 891-918. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
30. Wiggins, J. S. & Trapnell, P. D. (1996). A dyadic interactional perspective on the five-factor model. In: J. S. Wiggins, ed. The Five Factor Model of Personality: Theoretical Perspectives, pp. 88-162. New York: Guilford Press.
31. Yik, M. & Bond, M. H. (1993). Exploring the dimensions of Chinese person perception with indigenous and imported constructs: Creating a culturally balanced scale. International Journal of Psychology, 28, 75-95.