Action-oriented representation of peripersonal and extrapersonal space: Insights from manual and locomotor actions

Japanese Psychological Research

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 126-140

  Higuchi, Takahiro ^a,b   Imanaka, Kuniyasu ^a   Patla, Aftab E ^b  

^a TOKYO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Body schema; Perceptual motor task; Peripersonal space; Spatial perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750535834     PISSN: 00215368     EISSN: 14685884     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5884.2006.00314.x     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. Ackroyd, K., Riddoch, M. J., Humphreys, G. W., Nightingale, S., & Townsend, S. (2002). Widening the sphere of influence: Using a tool to extend extrapersonal visual space in a patient with severe neglect. Neurocase, 8, 1-12.
2. Aglioti, S., Smania, N., Manfredi, M., & Berlucchi, G. (1996). Disownership of left hand and objects related to it in a patient with right brain damage. Neuroreport, 8, 293-296.
3. Berlucchi, G., & Aglioti, S. (1997). The body in the brain: Neural bases of corporeal awareness. Trends in Neuroscience, 20, 560-564.
4. Berti, A., & Frassinetti, F. (2000). When far becomes near: Remapping of space by tool use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 415-420.
5. Berti, A., Smania, N., Rabuffetti, M., Ferrarin, M., Spinazzola, L., D'Amico, A., Ongaro, E., & Allport, A. (2002). Coding of far and near space during walking in neglect patients. Neuropsychology, 16, 390-399.
6. Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands "feel" touch that eyes see. Nature, 391, 756.
7. Buxbaum, L. J., Giovannetti, T., & Libon, D. (2000). The role of the dynamic body schema in praxis: Evidence from primary progressive apraxia. Brain and Cognition, 44, 166-191.
8. Cowey, A., Small, M., & Ellis, S. (1999). No abrupt change in visual hemineglect from near to far space. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1-6.
9. Donker, S. F., Mulder. T., Nienhuis, B., & Duysens, J. (2002). Adaptations in arm movements for added mass to wrist or ankle during walking. Experimental Brain Research, 146, 26-31.
10. Driver, J., & Vuilleumier, P. (2001). In S. Dehaene (Ed.), The cognitive neuroscience of consciousness (pp. 39-88). Cambridge: MIT Press.
11. Fame, A., & Làdavas, E. (2000). Dynamic sizechange of hand peripersonal space following tool use. Neuroreport, 11, 1645-1649.
12. Farnè, A., Pavani, F., Meneghello, F., & Làdavas, E. (2000). Left tactile extinction following visual stimulation of a rubber hand. Brain, 123, 2350-2360.
13. Fink, G. R., & Marshall, J. C. (2005). Motor aspects of unilateral neglect and related disorders. In H. J. Freund, M. Jeannerod, M. Hallet & R. Leiguarda (Eds.), Higher-order motor disorders (pp. 273-290). New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Flascher, O. M., Shaw, R. E., Kader, E. E., & Aromin, T. A. (1995). Intentional perceptual scaling means π = 1. In B. G. Bardy, R. J. Bootsma & Y. Guiard (Eds.), Studies in perception and action (pp. 133-136). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Forti, S., & Humphreys, G. W. (2004). Visuomotor cuing through tool use in unilateral visual neglect. Journal of General Psychology, 131, 379-410.
16. Fouad, K., Bastiaanse, C. M., & Dietz. V. (2001). Reflex adaptations during treadmill walking with increased body load. Experimental Brain Research, 137, 133-140.
17. Frenz, H., & Lappe, M. (2005). Absolute travel distance from optic flow. Vision Research, 45, 1679-1692.
18. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Wilmington, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
19. Gooey, K., Bradfleld, O., Talbot, J., Morgan, D. L., & Proske, U. (2000). Effects of body orientation, load and vibration on sensing position and movement at the human elbow joint. Experimental Brain Research, 133, 340-348.
20. Grasso, R., Zago, M., & Lacquaniti, F. (2000). Interactions between posture and locomotion: motor patterns in humans walking with bent posture versus erect posture. Journal of Neuro-physiology, 83, 288-300.
21. Graziano, M. S. A., & Gross, C. G. (1995). The representation of extrapersonal space: A possible role for bimodal, visual-tactile neurons. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neuroscience (pp. 1021-1034). Cambridge: MIT Press.
22. Halligan, P. W., & Marshall, J. C. (1991). Left neglect for near but not far space in man. Nature, 350, 498-500.
23. Head, H., & Holmes, G. (1911). Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesion. Brain, 34, 102-254.
24. van Hedel, H. J., & Dietz, V. (2004). Obstacle avoidance during human walking: effects of biomechanical constraints on performance. Archive of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, 972-979.
25. Higuchi, T., Hatano, N., Soma, K., & Imanaka, K. (submitted). Perceptual adaptation to spatial requirements for wheelchair use in experienced users with tetraplegia.
26. Higuchi, T., & Imanaka, K. (2005). Contribution of visual spatial perception and cognition to adaptive walking strategies. Japanese Journal of Biomechanics in Sports and Exercise, 9, 161-169. (In Japanese with English abstract.)
27. Higuchi, T., Imanaka, K., & Hatayama, T. (2002). Freezing degree of freedom under stress: Kinematic evidence of constrained movement strategies. Human Movement Science, 21, 831-846.
28. Higuchi, T., Takada, H., Matsuura, Y., & Imanaka, K. (2004). Visual estimation of spatial requirements for locomotion in novice wheelchair users. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10, 55-66.
29. Higuchi, T., Imanaka, K., & Hatayama, T. (2005). Adaptive movement strategies of the central nervous system under psychological stress. In A. V. Lee (Ed.), Psychology of coping (pp. 103-123). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
30. Higuchi, T., Cinelli, M. E., Greig, M. A., & Patla, A. E. (2006). Locomotion through apertures when wider space is necessary: Adaptation to altered bodily states. Experimental Brain Research, (in press).
31. Hollands, M. A., Patla, A. E., & Vickers, J. N. (2002). "Look where you're going!": gaze behaviour associated with maintaining and changing the direction of locomotion. Experimental Brain Research, 143, 221-230.
32. Holmes, N. P., Calvert, G. A., & Spence, C. (2004). Extending or projecting peripersonal space with tools?: Multisensory interactions highlight only the distal and proximal ends of tools. Neuroscience Letter, 372, 62-67.
33. Hunter, J. P., Katz, J., & Davis, K. D. (2003). The effect of tactile and visual sensory inputs on phantom limb awareness. Brain, 126, 579-589.
34. Iriki, A., Tanaka, M., & Iwamura, Y. (1996). Coding of modified body schema during a tool use by macaque postcentral neurons. Neuroreport, 7, 2325-2330.
35. Iriki, A., Tanaka, M., Obayashi, S., & Iwamura, Y. (2001). Self-images in the video monitor coded by monkey intraparietal neurons. Neuroscience Research, 40, 163-173.
36. Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 187-245.
37. Jeannerod, M. (2005). Levels of representation and goal-directed actions. In H. J. Freund, M. Jeannenod, M. Hallett & R. Leiguarda (Eds.), Higher-order motor disorders: from neuroanatomy, and neurobiotogy to clinical neurology (pp. 159-180). New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Kader, E. E., & Shaw, R. E. (2000). Toward an ecological field theory of perceptual control of locomotion. Ecological Psychology, 12, 141-180.
39. Kirschen, M. P., Kahana, M. J., Sekuler, R., & Burack, B. (2000). Optic flow helps humans learn to navigate through synthetic environments. Perception, 29, 801-818.
40. Krell, J., & Patla, A. E. (2002). The influence of multiple obstacles in the travel path on avoidance strategy. Gait and Posture, 16, 15-19.
41. Làdavas, E., di Pellegrino, G., Fame, A., & Zeloni, G. (1998). Neuropsychological evidence of an integrated visuotactile representation of peripersonal space in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 581-589.
42. Maravita, A., Spence, C., Clarke, K., Husain, M., & Driver, J. (2000). Vision and touch through the looking glass in a case of crossmodal extinction. Neuroreport, 11, 3521-3526.
43. Maravita, A., Husain, M., Clarke, K., & Driver, J. (2001). Reaching with a tool extends visualtactile interactions into far space: Evidence from cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia, 39, 580-585.
44. Maravita, A., Spence, C., Kennett, S., & Driver, J. (2002a). Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition, 83, B25-B34.
45. Maravita, A., Spence, C., Sergent, C., & Driver, J. (2002b). Seeing your own touched hands in a mirror modulates cross-modal interaction. Psychological Science, 13, 350-355.
46. Milner, A. D., & Mclntosh, R. D. (2005). The neurological basis of visual neglect. Current Opinion of Neurology, 18, 748-753.
47. Mohagheghi, A. A., Moraes, R., & Patla, A. E. (2004). The effects of distant and on-line visual information on the control of approach phase and step over an obstacle during locomotion. Experimental Brain Research, 155, 459-468.
48. Moraes, R., Lewis, M. A., & Patla, A. E. (2004). Strategies and determinants for selection of alternate foot placement during human locomotion: Influence of spatial and temporal constraints. Experimental Brain Research, 159, 1-13.
49. Morton, S. M., & Bastian, A. J. (2004). Prism adaptation during walking generalizes to reaching and requires the cerebellum. Journal of Neurophysiology, 92, 2497-2509.
50. Neppi-Modona, M., Auclair, D., Sirigu, A., & Duhamel, J. R. (2004). Spatial coding of the predicted impact location of a looming object. Current Biology, 14, 1174-1180.
51. Norman, J. (2002). Two visual systems and two theories of perception: An attempt to reconcile the constructivist and ecological approaches. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 73-144.
52. Ogden, J. (1985). Autotopagnosia. Occurrence in a patient without nominal aphasia and with an intact ability to point to parts of animals and objects. Brain, 108, 1009-1022.
53. Patla, A. E. (1998). How is human gait controlled by vision? Ecological Psychology, 10, 287-302.
54. Patla, A. E. (2003). Strategies for dynamic stability during adaptive human locomotion. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 22, 48-52.
55. Patla, A. E., & Vickers, J. N. (1997). Where and when do we look as we approach and step over an obstacle in the travel path? Neumreport, 8, 3661-3665.
56. Patla, A. E., & Vickers, J. N. (2003). How far ahead do we look when required to step on specific locations in the travel path during locomotion? Experimental Brain Research, 148, 133-138.
57. Patla, A. E., Rietdyk, S., Martin, C., & Prentice, S. (1996). Locomotor patterns of the leading and the trailing limbs as solid and fragile obstacles are stepped over: Some insights into the role of vision during locomotion. Journal of Motor Behavior, 28, 35-47.
58. Patla, A. E., Prentice, S., Rietdyk, S., Allard, F., & Martin, C. (1999). What guides the selection of alternate foot placement during locomotion in humans. Experimental Brain Research, 128, 441-450.
59. di Pellegrino, G., Làdavas, E., & Fame, A. (1997). Seeing where your hands are. Nature, 388, 730.
60. Ramachandran, V. S., Rogers-Ramachandran, D., & Cobb, S. (1995). Touching the phantom limb. Nature, 377, 489-490.
61. Reed, C. L., & Farah, M. J. (1995). The psychological reality of the body schema: A test with normal participants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 334-343.
62. Rohden, C., Heutink, J., Greenfleld, E., & Robertson, I. H. (1999). When a rubber hand "feels" what the real hand cannot. Neuroreport, 10, 135-138.
63. Rossetti, Y., Meckler, C., & Prablanc, C. (1994). Is there an optimal arm posture? Deterioration of finger localization precision and comfort sensation in extreme arm-joint postures. Experimental Brain Research, 99, 131-136.
64. Sirigu, A., Grafman, J., Bressler, K., & Sunderland, T. (1991). Multiple representations contribute to body knowledge processing. Evidence from a case of autotopagnosia. Brain, 114, 629-642.
65. Tresilian, J. R. (1999). Analysis of recent empirical challenges to an account of interceptive timing. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 515-528.
66. Turano, K. A., Geruschat, D. R., Baker, F. H., Stahl, J. W., & Shapiro, M. D. (2001). Direction of gaze while walking a simple route: Persons with normal vision and persons with retinitis pigmentosa. Optometry and Vision Science, 9, 67-675.
67. Turano, K. A., Yu, D., Hao, L., & Hicks, J. C. (2005). Optic-flow and egocentric-direction strategies in walking: Central vs. peripheral visual field. Vision Research, 45, 3117-3132.
68. Vercher, J. L., Sares, F., Blouin, J., Bourdin, C, & Gauthier, G. M. (2003). Role of sensory information in updating internal models of the effector during arm tracking. In C. Prablanc, D. Pellison & Y. Rossetti (Eds.), Progress in Brain Research (Vol. 142, pp. 203-222). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
69. Vogeley, K., & Fink, G. R. (2003). Neural correlates of the first-person-perspective. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 38-42.
70. Warren, W. H. Jr. (1998). Visually controlled locomotion: 40 years later. Ecological Psychology, 10, 177-219.
71. Warren, W. H. Jr., & Whang, S. (1987). Visual guidance of walking through apertures: Bodyscaled information for affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 371-383.
72. Warren, W. H. Jr., Kay, B. A., Zosh, W. D., Duchon, A. P., & Sahuc, S. (2001). Optic flow is used to control human walking. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 213-216.
73. Weerdesteyn, Y., Nienhuis, B., Hampsink, B., & Duysens, J. (2004). Gait adjustments in response to an obstacle are faster than voluntary reactions. Human Movement Science, 23, 351-363.
74. Weerdesteyn, Y., Nienhuis, B., Mulder, T., & Duysens, J. (2005). Older women strongly prefer stride lengthening to shortening in avoiding obstacles. Experimental Brain Research, 161, 39-46.
75. Zago, M., & Lacquaniti, F. (2005). The internal model of gravity for hand interception: Parametric adaptation to zero-gravity visual targets on Earth. Journal of Neurophysiology, 43, 178-188.
76. Zettel, J. L., Mcllroy, W. E., & Maki, B. E. (2002). Can stabilizing features of rapid triggered stepping reactions be modulated to meet environmental constraints? Experimental Brain Research, 145, 297-308.