The effect of tactile and visual sensory inputs on phantom limb awareness

Brain

Volumn 126, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 579-589

  Hunter, Judith P ^a,d,e,f   Katz, Joel ^b,c,d,e   Davis, Karen D ^a,d,g  

^a UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^c MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^f St John's Rehabilitation Hospital   (Canada)

^g TORONTO WESTERN HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Amputation; Illusion; Multisensory; Perception; Plasticity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPUTATION; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; ILLUSION; MALE; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; PERCEPTION; PHANTOM PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF CONCEPT; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION; TACTILE STIMULATION; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

EID: 0344643410     PISSN: 00068950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awg054     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Aglioti S, Smania N, Atzei A, Berlucchi G. Spatio-temporal properties of the pattern of evoked phantom sensations in a left index amputee patient. Behav Neurosci 1997; 111: 867-72.
2. Andersen RA, Snyder LH, Bradley DC, Xing J. Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. [Review]. Annu Rev Neurosci 1997; 20: 303-30.
3. Berlucchi G, Aglioti S. The body in the brain: neural bases of corporeal awareness. [Review]. Trends Neurosci 1997; 20: 560-4.
4. Blakemore SJ, Goodbody SJ, Wolpert DM. Predicting the consequences of our own actions: the role of sensorimotor context estimation. J Neurosci 1998a; 18: 7511-8.
5. Blakemore SJ, Wolpert DM, Frith CD. Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nat Neurosci 1998b; 1: 635-40.
6. Blakemore SJ, Wolpert D, Frith C. Why can't you tickle yourself? [Review]. Neuroreport 2000; 11: R11-6.
7. Blakemore SJ, Wolpert DM, Frith CD. Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Trends Cogn Sci 2002; 6: 237-42.
8. Botvinick M, Cohen J. Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 1998; 391: 756.
9. Botvinick M, Nystrom LE, Fissell K, Carter CS, Cohen JD. Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature 1999; 402: 179-81.
10. Doetsch GS. Perceptual significance of somatosensory cortical reorganization following peripheral denervation. [Review]. Neuroreport 1998; 9: R29-35.
11. Elbert T, Flor H, Birbaumer N, Knecht S, Hampson S, Larbid W, et al. Extensive reorganization of the somatosensory cortex in adult humans after nervous system injury. Neuroreport 1994; 5: 2593-7.
12. Farne A, Pavani F, Meneghello F, Ladavas E. Left tactile extinction following visual stimulation of a rubber hand. Brain 2000; 123: 2350-60.
13. Fink GR, Marshall JC, Halligan PW, Frith CD, Driver J, Frackowiak RS, et al. The neural consequences of conflict between intention and the senses. Brain 1999; 122: 497-512.
14. Flor H, Elbert T, Knecht S, Wienbruch C, Pantev C, Birbaumer N, et al. Phantom-limb pain as a perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization following arm amputation. Nature 1995; 375: 482-4.
15. Flor H, Elbert T, Mühlnickel W, Pantev C, Wienbruch C, Taub E. Cortical reorganization and phantom phenomena in congenital and traumatic upper-extremity amputees. Exp Brain Res 1998; 119: 205-12.
16. Flor H, Mühlnickel W, Karl A, Denke C, Grusser S, Kurth R, et al. A neural substrate for nonpainful phantom limb phenomena. Neuroreport 2000; 11: 1407-11.
17. Fourneret P, Jeannerod M. Limited conscious monitoring of motor performance in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 1998; 36: 1133-40.
18. Fraser CM, Halligan PW, Robertson IH, Kirker SG. Characterising phantom limb phenomena in upper limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 2001; 25: 235-42.
19. Frith CD, Blakemore SJ, Wolpert DM. Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2000; 355: 1771-88.
20. Halligan PW. Phantom limbs: the body in mind. Cogn Neuropsychiatry 2002; 7: 251-68.
21. Halligan PW, Marshall JC, Wade DT, Davey J, Morrison D. Thumb in cheek? Sensory reorganization and perceptual plasticity after limb amputation. Neuroreport 1993; 4: 233-6.
22. Halligan PW, Marshall JC, Wade DT. Sensory disorganization and perceptual plasticity after limb amputation: a follow-up study. Neuroreport 1994; 5: 1341-5.
23. Jensen TS, Krebs B, Nielsen J, Rasmussen P. Phantom limb, phantom pain and stump pain in amputees during the first 6 months following limb amputation. Pain 1983; 17: 243-56.
24. Jensen TS, Krebs B, Nielsen J, Rasmussen P. Non-painful phantom limb phenomena in amputees: incidence, clinical characteristics and temporal course. Acta Neurol Scand 1984; 70: 407-14.
25. Jensen TS, Krebs B, Nielsen J, Rasmussen P. Immediate and longterm phantom limb pain in amputees: incidence, clinical characteristics and relationship to pre-amputation limb pain. Pain 1985; 21: 267-78.
26. Katz J. Psychophysiological contributions to phantom limbs. [Review]. Can J Psychiatry 1992a; 37: 282-98.
27. Katz J. Psychophysical correlates of phantom limb experience. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992b; 55: 811-21.
28. Katz J, Melzack R. Pain 'memories' in phantom limbs: review and clinical observations. [Review]. Pain 1990; 43: 319-36.
29. Kawato M, Wolpert D. Internal models for motor control. [Review]. Novartis Found Symp 1998; 218: 291-304.
30. Kew JJ, Ridding MC, Rothwell JC Passingham RE, Leigh PN, Sooriakumaran S, et al. Reorganization of cortical blood flow and transcranial magnetic stimulation maps in human subjects after upper limb amputation. J Neurophysiol 1994; 72:2517-24.
31. Knecht S, Henningsen H, Elbert T, Flor H, Höhling C, Pantev C, et al. Cortical reorganization in human amputees and mislocalization of painful stimuli to the phantom limb. Neurosci Lett 1995; 201: 262-4.
32. Knecht S, Henningsen H, Elbert T, Flor H, Höhling C, Pantev C, et al. Reorganizational and perceptional changes after amputation. Brain 1996; 119: 1213-9.
33. Kooijman CM, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JH, Elzinga A, van der Schans CP. Phantom pain and phantom sensations in upper limb amputees: an epidemiological study. Pain 2000; 87: 33-41.
34. Lackner JR. Some proprioceptive influences on the perceptual representation of body shape and orientation. Brain 1988; 111: 281-97.
35. Ladavas E, Farne A, Zeloni G, di Pellegrino G. Seeing or not seeing where your hands are. Exp Brain Res 2000; 131: 458-67.
36. Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1975; 1: 277-99.
37. Melzack R. Phantom limbs. Sci Am 1992; 266: 120-6.
38. Merzenich MM, Nelson RJ, Stryker MP, Cynader MS, Schoppmann A, Zook JM. Somatosensory cortical map changes following digit amputation in adult monkeys. J Comp Neurol 1984; 224: 591-605.
39. Nikolajsen L, Ilkjær S, Kroner K, Christensen JH, Jensen TS. The influence of preamputation pain on postamputation stump and phantom pain. Pain 1997; 72: 393-405.
40. Pascual-Leone A, Peris M, Tormos JM, Pascual AP, Catalá MD. Reorganization of human cortical motor output maps following traumatic forearm amputation. Neuroreport 1996; 7: 2068-70.
41. Pavani F, Spence C, Driver J. Visual capture of touch: out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychol Sci 2000; 11: 353-9.
42. Pons TP, Garraghty PE, Ommaya AK, Kaas JH, Taub E, Mishkin M. Massive cortical reorganization after sensory deafferentation in adult macaques. Science 1991; 252. 1857-60.
43. Ramachandran VS, Hirstein W. The perception of phantom limbs. The D. O. Hebb lecture. [Review]. Brain 1998; 121: 1603-30.
44. Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D. Phantom limbs and neural plasticity. Arch Neurol 2000; 57: 317-20.
45. Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran DC, Stewart M. Perceptual correlates of massive cortical reorganization. Science 1992; 258: 1159-60.
46. Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D, Cobb S. Touching the phantom limb. Nature 1995; 377: 489-90.
47. Rizzolatti G, Luppino G, Matelli M. The organization of the cortical motor system: new concepts. [Review]. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998; 106: 283-96.
48. Roricht S, Meyer BU, Niehaus L, Brandt SA. Long-term reorganization of motor cortex outputs after arm amputation. Neurology 1999; 53: 106-11.
49. Sathian K. Intermanual referral of sensation to anaesthetic hands. Neurology 2000; 54: 1866-98.
50. Sherman RA. Phantom pain. New York: Plenum Press; 1997.
51. Sherman RA, Sherman CJ, Parker L. Chronic phantom and stump pain among American veterans: results of a survey. Pain 1984; 18: 83-95.
52. Sherman RA, Arena JG, Sherman CJ, Ernst JL. The mystery of phantom pain: growing evidence for psychophysiological mechanisms, [Review]. Biofeedback Self Regul 1989; 14: 267-80.
53. Slachevsky A, Pillon B, Fourneret P, Pradat-Diehl P, Jeannerod M, Dubois B. Preserved adjustment but impaired awareness in a sensory-motor conflict following prefrontal lesions. J Cogn Neurosci 2001; 13: 332-40.
54. Weiss SA, Lindell B. Phantom limb pain and etiology of amputation in unilateral lower extremity amputees. J Pain Symptom Manage 1996; 11: 3-17.
55. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z. Computational principles of movement neuroscience. [Review]. Nat Neurosci 2000; 3 Suppl: 1212-7.
56. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 1995; 269: 1880-2.