Third party characteristics, territory and the mediation of militarized interstate disputes

Conflict Management and Peace Science

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 267-284

  Frazier, Derrick V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Mediation; Territory; Third parties

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750527768     PISSN: 07388942     EISSN: 15499219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07388940600972628     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Anderton, C. H., and J. R. Carter. 2001. The impact of war on trade: An interrupted times-series study. Journal of Peace Research 38(4): 445-457.
2. Barbieri, K., and J. Levy. 1999. Sleeping with the enemy: The impact of war on trade. Journal of Peace Research 36(4): 463-479.
3. Barbieri, K., and G. Schneider. 1999. Globalization and peace: Assessing new directions in the study of trade and conflict. Journal of Peace Research 36(4): 387-404.
4. Bercovitch, J., J. T. Anagnoson, and D. L. Wille. 1991. Some conceptual issues and empirical trends in the study of successful mediation in international relations. Journal of Peace Research 28(1): 7-17.
5. Bercovitch, J., and J. Rubin, eds. 1992. Mediation in international relations. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
6. Bercovitch, J., and J. Langley. 1993. The nature of the dispute and the effectiveness of international mediation. Journal of Conflict Resolution 37(4): 670-691.
7. Bercovitch, J., and A. Houston. 2000. Why do they do it like this? An analysis of the factors influencing mediation behavior in international conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution 44(2): 170-202.
8. Bremer, S. 1992. Dangerous dyads: Conditions affecting the likelihood of interstate war, 1816-1995. Journal of Conflict Resolution 36: 309-341.
9. Brockner, J., and J. Rubin. 1985. Entrapment in escalating conflicts: A social psychological analysis. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
10. Bueno de Mesquita, B., and J.D. Singer. 1973. Alliances, capabilities and war: A review and synthesis. In C. P. Cotter, ed. Political science annual: An international review. New York, NY: Bobbs-Merrill.
11. Butterworth, R. 1978. Do conflict managers matter? International Studies Quarterly 22(2):195-214.
12. Carnevale, P. 1986. Strategic choice in mediation. Negotiation Journal 2: 41-56.
13. Carnevale, P., and D. G. Pruitt. 1992. Negotiation and mediation. Annual Review of Psychology 43: 531-582.
14. Corbetta, R., and W. J. Dixon. 2005. Third parties in interstate disputes. Journal of Conflict Management and Peace Science 22: 39-61.
15. Diehl, P. F., and G. Goertz. 2000. War and peace in international rivalry. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
16. Dixon, W. J. 1994. Democracy and the peaceful settlement of international conflict. American Political Science Review 88: 14-32.
17. Dixon, W. J. 1998a. Dyads, disputes and the democratic peace. In W. Murray, ed. The political economy of war and peace. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
18. Dixon, W. J. 1998b. Democracy, conflict management, and militarized interstate disputes. The University of Arizona: Typescript.
19. Dixon, W. J., and P. Senese. 2002. Democracies, disputes and negotiated settlements. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46(4): 547-571.
20. Fordham, B. O. 1998. Economic interests, party, and ideology in early cold war era U.S. foreign policy. International Organization 52(2): 359-396.
21. Frazier, D. V. 2004. Patterns of third party and disputant initiated mediation in militarized interstate disputes, 1946-1992. Dissertation, Political Science, University of Arizona, Tucson.
22. Frazier, D., and G. Goertz. 2002. Patterns of negotiation in non-war disputes. International Negotiation 7: 339-361.
23. Frei, D. 1976. Conditions affecting the effectiveness of international mediation. Papers of the Peace Science Society International 26: 67-84.
24. Gartzke, E., Q. Li, and C. Boehmer. 2001. Investing in the peace: Economic interdependence and international conflict. International Organization 55(2): 391-438.
25. Gartzke, E., and Q. Li. 2003. Measure for measure: Concept operationalization and the trade interdependence-conflict debate. Journal of Peace Research 40(5): 553-571.
26. Gasiorowski, M., and S. Polachek. 1982. Conflict and interdependence. Journal of Conflict Resolution 26: 709-729.
27. Gasiorowski, M. 1986. Economic interdependence and international conflict: Some Cross-national evidence. International Studies Quarterly 30: 23-38.
28. Gleditsch, K. 2002. Expanded trade and GDP data. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (5): 712-724.
29. Goertz, G., and P. F. Diehl. 1992. The empirical importance of enduring rivalries. International Interactions 18: 1-11.
30. Greig, M. 2001. Moments of opportunity: Recognizing conditions of ripeness for international mediation between enduring rivals. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45(6): 691-718.
31. Greig, M. 2005. Stepping into the fray: When do mediators mediate? American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 249-266.
32. Hensel, P. 1996. Charting a course to conflict: Territorial issues and militarized interstate disputes, 1816-1992. Conflict Management and Peace Science 15: 43-73.
33. Hensel, P. 2000. Territory: Theory and evidence on geography and conflict. In J. A. Vasquez, ed. What do we know about war? New York, NY: Rowman and Littlefield: 57-84.
34. Hensel, P. 2001. Contentious issues and world politics: The management of territorial claims in the Americas, 1816-1992. International Studies Quarterly 45(1): 81-110.
35. Huth, P. K., and B. Russett. 1988. Deterrence failure and crisis escalation. International Studies Quarterly 32(1): 29-45.
36. Jaccard, J. 2001. Interaction effects in logistic regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
37. Jones, D., S. Bremer, and J. D. Singer. 1996. Militarized interstate disputes, 1816-1992: Rationale, coding rules, and empirical patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science 15(2): 163-213.
38. Keshk, O. B. M. Pollins, and R. Reuveny. 2004. Trade still follows the flag: The primacy of politics in a simultaneous model of interdependence and armed conflict. The Journal of Politics 66(4): 1155-1179.
39. Kleiboer, M. 1996. Understanding success and failure in international mediation. Journal of Conflict Resolution 40(2): 360-389.
40. Kressel, K., and D. Pruitt, eds. 1989. Mediation research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
41. Lall, A. 1966. Modern international negotiations: Principle and practice. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
42. Lebovic, J. 1988. National interests and US foreign aid: The Carter and Reagan years. Journal of Peace Research 25(2): 115-135.
43. Leeds, B. A., A. Long, and S. McLaughlin Mitchell. 2000. Reevaluating alliance reliability: Specific threats, specific promises. Journal of Conflict Resolution 44(5): 686-699.
44. Long, S. 1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
45. Mansfield, E., and B. M. Pollins. 2001. The study of interdependence and conflict: Recent advances, open questions and directions for future research. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45(6): 834-859.
46. Mansfield, E., and J. C. Pevehouse. 2000. Trade blocs, trade flows, and international conflict. International Organization 54(4): 775-808.
47. Marshall, M. G., and K. Jaggers. 2003. Polity IV project: Regime characteristics and transitions, 1800-2001. University of Maryland: Mimeo.
48. McDonald, P. J. 2004. Peace through trade or free trade? Journal of Conflict Resolution 8(4): 547-572.
49. Miall, H. 1992. The peacemakers: Peaceful settlements of disputes since 1945. London: MacMillan.
50. Miller, B. 2001. The global sources of regional transitions from war to peace. Journal of Peace Research 38(2): 199-225.
51. Morgenthau, H. J. 1948. Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
52. Morgenthau, H. J. 1952. Another great debate: The national interest of the United States. American Political Science Review 46(4): 961-988.
53. Morrow, J. 1999. How could trade affect conflict? Journal of Peace Research 36(4): 481-489.
54. Morse, E. 1970. The transformation of foreign policies: Modernization, interdependence, and externalization. World Politics 22(3): 371-392.
55. Ott, M. 1972. Mediation as a method of conflict resolution: Two cases. International Organization 26: 595-618.
56. Pevehouse, J. C. 2004. Interdependence theory and the measurement of international conflict. The Journal of Politics 66(1): 247-266.
57. Princen, T. 1992. Intermediaries in international conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58. Pruitt, D. 2002. Mediator behavior and success in mediation. In J. Bercovitch, ed. Studies in international mediation. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
59. Russett, B., and J. Oneal. 1999. The Kantian peace: The pacific benefits of democracy, interdependence, and international organizations, 1885-1992. World Politics 52: 1-37.
60. Simmons, B. 2004. Trade and territorial conflict: International borders as institutions. Unpublished manuscript.
61. Siverson, R., and H. Starr. 1990. Opportunity, willingness, and the diffusion of war 1816-1965. American Political Science Review 84: 47-67.
62. Thee, M. 1980. The China-Indochina conflict: Notes on the background and conflict resolution. The case of neutrality. Journal of Peace Research 17(3): 223-333.
63. Touval, S. 1992. The superpowers as mediators. In J. Bercovitch, ed. Mediation in international relations: Multiple approaches to conflict management. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
64. Touval, S. 1975. Biased intermediaries: Theoretical and historical considerations. Jerusalem Journal of International Relations 1: 51-69.
65. Uvin, P. 1992. Regime, surplus, and self-interest: The international politics of food aid. International Studies Quarterly 36(3): 293-312.
66. Vasquez, J. 1993. The war puzzle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67. Vasquez, J., and M. Henehan. 2001. Territorial disputes and the probability ofwar, 1816-1992. Journal of Peace Research 38(2): 123-138.
68. Wall, J. 1981. Mediation: An analysis, review and proposed research. Journal of Conflict Resolution 25: 157-180.
69. Wall, J., J. Stark, and R. Standifer. 2001. Mediation:Acurrent reviewand theory development. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45: 370-391.
70. Waltz, K. 1979. Theories of international politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
71. Wilkenfeld, J., K. Young, V. Asal, and D. Quinn. 2003. Mediating international crises. Cross national and experimental perspectives. Journal of Conflict Resolution 47(3): 279-301.
72. Zartman, I. W. 1985. Ripe for resolution: Conflict and intervention in Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.