Danger beyond dyads: Third-party participants in militarized interstate disputes

Conflict Management and Peace Science

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 39-61

  Corbetta, Renato ^a   Dixon, William J ^b  

^a GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Conflict; Intervention; Joining; Major powers; Third parties

Indexed keywords

EID: 27944501016     PISSN: 07388942     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07388940590915318     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Altfeld, M. F., and B. Bueno de Mesquita. 1979. Choosing side in war. International Studies Quarterly 23(1): 87-112.
2. Azar, E. E. 1980. The conflict and peace data bank (COPDAB) project. Journal of Conflict Resolution 24(1): 143-152.
3. Bennett, D. S., and A. C. Stam III. 2000. EUGene: A conceptual manual. International Interactions 26(2): 179-204. Also available online at http://eugenesoftware.org
4. Bercovitch, J., and R. Jackson. 1997. International conflict: A chronological encyclopedia of conflicts and their management, 1945-1995. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
5. Bueno de Mesquita, B. 1981. The war trap. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
6. Bremer, S. A. 1982. The contagiousness of coercion: The spread of serious international disputes, 1900-1976. International Interactions 9(1): 29-55.
7. Bremer, S. A. 1992. Dangerous dyads: Conditions affecting the likelihood of interstate war, 1816-1965. Journal of Conflict Resolution 36(2): 309-341.
8. Bremer, S. A. 2000. Who fights whom, when, where, and why? In What do we know about war?, ed. J. A. Vasquez. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
9. Corbetta, R. 2003. Collecting new evidence on interventions in militarized disputes: Rationale, procedures, and preliminary findings. The University of Arizona: Typescript.
10. Corbetta, R., and W. J. Dixon. 2004. Multilateralism, major powers, and militarized disputes. Political Research Quarterly 57(1): 5-14.
11. Cusack, T. R., and W. D. Eberwin. 1982. Prelude to war: Incidence, escalation, and intervention in international disputes, 1900-1976. International Interactions 9(1): 9-28.
12. Dixon, W.J. 1993. Democracy and the management of international conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution 37(1): 42-68.
13. Dixon, W. J. 1994. Democracy and the peaceful settlement of international conflict. American Political Science Review 88(1): 14-32.
14. Dixon, W. J. 1996. Third party techniques for preventing conflict escalation and promoting peaceful settlement. International Organization 50(6): 653-682.
15. Dixon, W. J. 1998. Democracy, conflict management, and militarized interstate disputes. The University of Arizona: Typescript.
16. Dupuy, E. R., and T. N. Dupuy. 1993. The Harper encyclopedia of military history from 3500 B.C. to the present, 4th ed. New York: HarperCollins.
17. Gerner, D. J., P. A. Schrodt, R. A. Francisco, and J. L. Weddle. 1994. Machine coding of event data using regional and international sources. International Studies Quarterly 38(1): 91-119.
18. Goldstein, J. S. 1992. A conflict and cooperation scale for WEIS events. Journal of Conflict Resolution 36(2): 369-385.
19. Ghosn, F., and G. Palmer. 2003. Codebook for the Militarized Interstate Dispute Data, version 3.0. Available online at http://cow2.la.psu.edu.
20. Ghosn, F., G. Palmer, and S. A. Bremer. 2004. The MID3 data set, 1993-2001: Procedures, coding rules, and description. Conflict Management and Peace Science 21(2): 133-154.
21. Hensel, P. R. 2001. Contentious issues and world politics: The management of territorial claims in the Americas, 1816-1992. International Studies Quarterly 45(1): 81-109.
22. Hensel, P. R., and McLaughlin, M. S. 2001. International institutions and the compliance with agreements over contentious issues. Paper presented at the 2002 North American Meeting of the Peace Science Society (International). Tucson, Arizona, November 1-3.
23. Holsti, K. J. 1983. International politics: A framework for analysis, 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
24. Jones, D. M., S. A. Bremer, and J. D. Singer. 1996. Militarized interstate disputes, 1816-1992: Rationale, coding rules, and empirical patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science 15(2): 163-213.
25. Kaw, M. 1990. Choosing sides: Testing a political proximity model. American Journal of Political Science 34(2): 441-470.
26. Kim, C. 1991. Third party participation in wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution 35(4): 659-677.
27. King, G., R. O. Keohane, and S. Verba. 1994. Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28. King, G., and L. Zeng. 2001. Explaining rare events in international relations. International Organizations 55(3): 693-715.
29. King, G., and W. Lowe. 2003. An automated information extraction tool for international conflict data with performance as good as human coders: A rare events evaluation design. International Organization 57(3): 617-642.
30. Kydd, A. 2003. Which side are you on?: Bias, credibility and mediation. American Journal of Political Science 47(3): 597-611.
31. Leeds, A. B., A. G. Long, and S. McLaughlin Mitchell. 2000. Reevaluating alliance reliability. Journal of Conflict Resolution 44(5): 686-699.
32. Lemke, D. 2003. African lessons for international relations research. World Politics 56(October): 114-138.
33. Mingst, K. A., and Karns, M. P. 1999. The United Nations in the post-Cold War era, 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
34. Petersen, K. K., J. A. Vasquez, and Y. Wang. 2004. Multiparty disputes and the probability of war 1816-1992. Conflict Management and Peace Science 21(2): 85-100.
35. Raymond, A. G. 1994. Democracies, disputes, and third-party intermediaries. Journal of Conflict Resolution 38(1): 24-42.
36. Signorino, C. S. 1999. Strategic interaction and the statistical analysis of international conflict. American Political Science Review 93(2): 279-297.
37. Signorino, C. S. 2002. Strategy and selection in international relations. International Interactions 28(1): 93-115.
38. Singer, J. D., and M. Small. 1972. The wages of war, 1816-1965: A statistical handbook. New York: Wiley.
39. Smith, A. 1996. To intervene or not to intervene: A biased decision. Journal of Conflict Resolution 40(1): 16-40.
40. Vasquez, J. A. 1993. The war puzzle. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41. Vasquez, J. A. 2000. Reexamining the steps to war: New evidence and theoretical insights. In Handbook of war studies II, ed. Manus I. Midlarsky. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
42. Vasquez, J. A. 2004. The probability of war, 1816-1992: Presidential address to the International Studies Association, March 25, 2002, New Orleans. International Studies Quarterly 48(1):1-28.
43. Vincent, J. E. 1983. WEIS vs. COPDAB: Correspondence problems. International Studies Quarterly 27(2): 161-168.
44. Weisburd, M. A. 1997. Use of force: The practice of states since World War II. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
45. Werner, S., and D. Lemke. 1997. Opposites do not attract: The impact of domestic institutions, power, and prior commitments on alignment choices. International Studies Quarterly 41(3): 529-546.
46. Werner, S. 2000. Deterring intervention: The stakes of war and third party involvement. American Journal of Political Science 44(4): 720-732.
47. Yamamoto, Y., and S. A. Bremer. 1980. Wider wars and restless nights: Major power intervention in ongoing wars. In The Correlates of War II: Testing some realpolitik models, ed. David J. Singer, New York: Free Press.