Democracy, disputes, and negotiated settlements

Journal of Conflict Resolution

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 547-571

  Dixon, W J ^a   Senese, P D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036334297     PISSN: 00220027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022002702046004004     Document Type: Review

References (72)

1. Beck, Nathaniel, Jonathan N. Katz, and Richard Tucker. 1998. Taking time seriously: Time-series-cross section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science 42:1260-88.
2. Bennett, D. Scott, and Allan Stam. 2000. EUGene: A conceptual manual. International Interactions 26:179-204.
3. Bercovitch, Jacob, J. Theodore Anagnoson, and Donnette L. Wille. 1991. Some conceptual issues and empirical trends in the study of successful mediation in international relations. Journal of Peace Research 28:7-17.
4. Bremer, Stuart A. 1992. Dangerous dyads: Conditions affecting the likelihood of interstate war, 1816-1965. Journal of Conflict Resolution 36:309-41.
5. _. 1993. Democracy and militarized interstate conflict. International Interactions 18:231-50.
6. Bollen, Kenneth A. 1980. Issues in the comparative measurement of political democracy. American Socio-logical Review 45:370-90.
7. _. 1993. Liberal democracy: Validity and methods factors in cross-national measures. American Journal of Political Science 37:1207-31.
8. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, James D. Morrow, Randolph M. Siverson, and Alastair Smith. 1999. An institutional explanation of the democratic peace. American Political Science Review 93:791-807.
9. Cederman, Lars-Erik. 2001. Back to Kant: Reinterpreting the democratic peace as a macrohistorical learning process. American Political Science Review 95:15-31.
10. Cederman, Lars-Erik, and Mohan Penubarti Rao. 2001. The dynamics of the democratic peace. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45:818-33.
11. Diehl, Paul F. 1985. Contiguity and military escalation in major power rivalries. 1816-1980. Journal of Politics 47:1203-11.
12. Dixon, William J. 1993. Democracy and the management of international conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution 37:42-68.
13. _. 1994. Democracy and the peaceful settlement of international conflict. American Political Science Review 88:14-32.
14. _. 1996. Third-party techniques for preventing conflict escalation and promoting peaceful settlement. International Organization 50:653-81.
15. _. 1998. Dyads, disputes and the democratic peace. In The political economy of war and peace, edited by Murray Wolfson, 103-26. Boston: Kluwer.
16. Doyle, Michael. 1983. Kant, liberal legacies, and foreign affairs, Parts I and II. Philosophy and Public Affairs 12:205-35, 323-57.
17. Draper. Theodore. 1968. The Dominican revolt: A case study in American policy. New York: Commentary.
18. Farber, Henry, and Joanne Gowa. 1995. Polities and peace. International Security 20:123-46.
19. _. 1997. Common interests or common politics? Reinterpreting the democratic peace. Journal of Politics 59:393-417.
20. Gartzke, Erik. 1998. Kant we all just get along? Opportunity, willingness, and the origins of the democratic peace. American Journal of Political Science 42:1-27.
21. _. 2000. Preferences and the democratic peace. International Studies Quarterly 44:191-212.
22. Gastil, Raymond D. 1991. The comparative survey of freedom: Experiences and suggestions. In On measuring democracy, edited by Alex Inkeles, 21-46. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
23. Gleditsch, Kristian S., and Michael D. Ward. 1997. Double take: A Re-examination of democracy and autocracy in modem polities. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41:361-82.
24. Gowa, Joanne. 1999. Ballots and bullets: The elusive democratic peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25. Gurr, Ted Robert, Keith Jaggers, and Will H. Moore. 1990. The transformation of the Western state. Studies in Comparative International Development 25:73-108.
26. Hegre, Havard. 2000. Development and the liberal peace: What does it take to be a trading state? Journal of Peace Research 37:5-30.
27. Jaggers, Keith, and Ted Robert Gurr. 1995. Tracking democracy's third wave with the Polity III data. Journal of Peace Research 32:469-82.
28. Jones, Daniel M., Stuart A. Bremer, and J. David Singer. 1996. Militarized interstate disputes, 1816-1992: Rationale, coding rules, and empirical patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science 15:163-213.
29. King, Gary, Michael Tomz, and Jason Wittenberg. 2000. Making the most of statistical analysis. American Journal of Political Science 44:341-55.
30. Krebs, Ronald R. 1999. Perverse internationalism: NATO and the Greco-Turkish conflict. International Organization 53:343-66.
31. Lai, Brian, and Dan Reiter. 2000. Democracy, political similarity, and international alliances, 1816-1992. Journal of Conflict Resolution 44:203-27.
32. Lake, David A. 1992. Powerful pacifists: Democratic states and war. American Political Science Review 86:24-37.
33. Lemke, Douglas, and William Reed. 2001. The relevance of politically relevant dyads. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45:126-43.
34. Lowenthal, Abraham F. 1995. The Dominican intervention. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
35. Maoz, Zeev. 1998. Realist and cultural critiques of the democratic peace: A theoretical and empirical reassessment. International Interactions 24:3-89.
36. Maoz, Zeev, and Bruce M. Russell. 1992. Alliances, wealth, contiguity and political stability: Is the lack of conflict between democracies a statistical artifact? International Interactions 17:245-67.
37. Mason, T. David, and Patrick J. Fett. 1996. How civil wars end: A rational choice approach. Journal of Conflict Resolution 40:546-68.
38. McLaughlin, Sara, Scott Gates, Håvard Hegre, Ranveig Gissinger, and Nils Fetter Gleditsch. 1998. Timing the changes in political structures: A new Polity database. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42:231-42.
39. Miall, Hugh. 1992. The peacemakers: Peaceful settlement of disputes since 1945. New York: St. Martin's.
40. Mousseau, Michael. 1998. Democracy and compromise in militarized interstate conflicts, 1816-1992. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42:210-30.
41. _. 2000. Market prosperity, democratic consolidation, and democratic peace. Journal of Conflict Resolution 44:472-507.
42. Oneal, John R., Frances H. Oneal, Zeev Maoz, and Bruce Russen. 1996. The liberal peace: Interdependence, democracy, and international conflict: 1950-1986. Journal of Peace Research 33: 11-28.
43. Oneal, John R., and Bruce Russett. 1997. The classical liberals were right: Democracy, interdependence, and conflict, 1950-1985. International Studies Quarterly 41:267-94.
44. _. 1999a. Is the liberal peace just an artifact of cold war interests? International Interactions 25:213-41.
45. _. 1999b. The Kantian peace: The pacific benefits of democracy, interdependence, and international organization. World Politics 52:1-37.
46. Partell, Peter J. 1997. Escalation at the outset: An analysis of targets' responses in militarized interstate disputes. International Interactions 23:1-27.
47. Ray, James Lee. 1995. Democracy and international conflict. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
48. _. 1997. The democratic path to peace. Journal of Democracy 8:49-64.
49. Raymond, Gregory A. 1994. Democracies, disputes, and third party intermediaries. Journal of Conflict Resolution 38: 24-42.
50. Reed. William. 2000. A unified statistical model of conflict onset and escalation. American Journal of Political Science 44:84-93.
51. Reiter, Dan, and Allan C. Stam. 1998. Democracy, war initiation, and victory. American Political Science Review 92:377-89.
52. Rummel, R. J. 1975-81. Understanding conflict and war. 5 vols. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
53. Russett, Bruce. 1993. Grasping the democratic peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
54. Russett, Bruce, and John R. Oneal. 2001. Triangulating peace: Democracy, interdependence and international organizations. New York: W. W. Norton.
55. Senese, Paul D. 1996. Geographical proximity and issue salience: Their effects on the escalation of militarized interstate conflict. Conflict Management and Peace Science 15: 133-61.
56. _. 1997a. Between dispute and war: The effect of joint democracy on interstate conflict escalation. Journal of Politics 59:1-27.
57. _. 1997b. Costs and demands: International sources of dispute initiation and reciprocation. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41:406-25.
58. _. 1999. Democracy and maturity: Deciphering conditional effects on levels of dispute intensity. International Studies Quarterly 43:483-502.
59. _. 2001. Dyad-years and data management. Conflict Processes Newsletter. American Political Science Association. Retrieved June from http: //www.apsanet.org/̃confiict/.
60. Signorino, Curt S. 1999. Strategic interaction and the statistical analysis of international conflict. American Political Science Review 93:279-98.
61. Signorino, Curt S., and Jeffrey M. Ritter. 1999. Tau-B or not Tau-B: Measuring the similarity of foreign policy positions. International Studies Quarterly 43:115-44.
62. Simon, Michael W., and Erik Gartzke. 1996. Political system similarity and the choice of alliances: Do democracies flock together, or do opposites attract? Journal of Conflict Resolution 40:617-35.
63. Singer, J. David. 1988. Reconstructing the correlates of war data set on material capabilities of states, 1816-1985. International Interactions 14:115-32.
64. Siverson, Randolph M., and Juliann Emmons. 1991. Birds of a feather: Democratic political systems and alliance choices in the twentieth century. Journal of Conflict Resolution 35:285-306.
65. Slater, Jerome. 1970. Intervention and negotiation: The United States and the Dominican Revolution. New York: Harper and Row.
66. Smith, Alastair. 1999. Testing theories of strategic choice: The example of crisis escalation. American Journal of Political Science 43:1254-88.
67. Stam, Allan C. 1996. Win, lose, or draw: Domestic politics and the crucible of war. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
68. Thompson, William R., and Richard Tucker. 1997. A tale of two democratic peace critiques. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41:428-54.
69. Tomz, Michael, Jason Wittenberg, and Gary King. 2000. Clarify: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Version 1.2.2. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. Retrieved from http://gking.harvard.edu.
70. Vanhanen, Tatu. 2000. A new dataset for measuring democracy, 1820-1998. Journal of Peace Research 37:251-65.
71. Vasquez, John A. 1993. The war puzzle. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
72. Weart, Spencer R. 1998. Never at war: Why democracies will not fight one another. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.