Random effects logistic regression model for ranking efficiency in data envelopment analysis

Journal of the Operational Research Society

Volumn 57, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 1289-1299

  Sohn, S Y ^a  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Clusters; DEA; Environmental factors; IT project selection; Multinomial Dirichlet regression model; Ranking analysis

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; EXPERT SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROJECT SELECTION; MULTINOMIAL DIRICHLET REGRESSION MODELS; RANKING ANALYSIS;

DATA REDUCTION;

EID: 33750489390     PISSN: 01605682     EISSN: 14769360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602117     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Andersen P and Peterson NC (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Mngt Sci 39: 1261-1264.
2. Banker RD, Charnes A and Cooper WW (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Mngt Sci 30: 1078-1092.
3. Charnes A, Cooper WW and Rhodes E (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Opl Res 2: 429-444.
4. Dyson RG, Allen R, Camanho AS, Podinovski V, Sarrico CS and Shale EA (2001). Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. Eur J Opl Res 132: 3-17.
5. Farrell MJ (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Statist Soc Ser A 120: 253-290.
6. Førsund F and Sarafoglou N (2002). On the origins of data envelopment analysis. J Product Anal 17: 23-40.
7. Friedman L and Sinuany-Stern Z (1998). Combining ranking scales and selecting variables in the DEA context: the case of industrial branches. Comput Oper Res 25: 781-791.
8. Greene WH and Hensher DA (2003). A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrast with mixed logit. Transport Res Part B 37: 681-698.
9. Johnson N and Kotz S (1970). Distributions in Statistics: Continuous Univariate Distributions. Wiley: New York.
10. SAS Institute (1998). SAS/STAT User's Guide 6.03. SAS Institute: Cary, NC.
11. Sohn SY (1993). A comparative study of four estimators for analyzing the random event rate of the Poisson process. J Statist Comput Simulat 49: 1-10.
12. Sohn S Y (1996). Empirical Bayesian analysis for traffic intensity: M/M/1 queues with covariates. Queue Syst 22: 383-401.
13. Sohn SY (1997). Bayesian dynamic forecasting for attribute reliability. Comput Industr Eng 33: 741-744.
14. Sohn SY (1999). Robust parameter design for integrated circuit fabrication procedure with respect to categorical characteristic. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 66: 253-260.
15. Sohn SY (2002). Robust design of server capability in M/M/1 queues with both partly random arrival and service rates. Comput Oper Res 29: 433-440.
16. Sohn SY and Choi H (2005). Random effects logistic regression model for data envelopment analysis with correlated decision making units. J Opl Res Soc, accepted for publication.
17. Sohn SY and Moon TH (2003). Structural equation model for predicting technology commercialization success index. Technol Forecast Social Change 70: 885-899.
18. Sohn SY and Yoon KB (2005). Dynamic preventive maintenance scheduling of the modules of fighter aircrafts based on random effects regression model, submitted for publication.